Sample path properties of Brownian motion
[52/42%]Let be SBM. Let ,
Show that w.p. 1 as . (Hint: Show are iid and .)
Using this show that w.p. 1 as and give another proof of the time inversion result 15.2.3.
Let be a Brownian motion. Show that if , then
Hint: Let , estimate
using (3.9), and then use the Borel-Cantelli lemma.
Let be a one-dimensional Brownian motion and . Prove that
If is a Brownian motion and is a constant, then the process is a Brownian motion with drift. Prove that if , then
Use the reflection principle to prove that if is a Brownian motion and , then
In other words, Brownian motion enters the interval immediately. By symmetry it enters the interval immediately. Conclude that Brownian motion hits 0 infinitely often in every time interval .
Let and be as in Exercise 4.1.
Let and let with . Show that there exists a constant , depending on , and , but not or , such that
Show that the path of a Brownian motion does not take on the same value as a local maximum twice. That is, if and are times when has a local maximum, then , a.s.
Let be the number of upcrossings of by a Brownian motion up to time . This means we let , and for , and we set . Show that , a.s., as .
Let be a Brownian motion. The zero set of Brownian motion is the random set
Show that is a closed set for each .
Show that with probability one, every point of is a limit point of . Conclude that is an uncountable set.
Let be a one-dimensional Brownian motion and .
Prove that there exists such that if , then
Prove there exists such that
Prove that if , then
and the same with in place of . Conclude that
Use induction to prove that if , there exists such that
Prove that if is a -dimensional Brownian motion, , and , there exists such that
The -variation of a function on the interval is defined by
the supremum is over all partitions of . In this exercise we will prove that if and is a Brownian motion, then , a.s.
Let be an i.i.d. sequence of random variables with finite mean. Use the strong law of large numbers to prove that if , then
as .
If , take , and let . Let and for , set . Set . Prove that the are i.i.d. with finite mean.
Use (1) to show that
as .
Using the partition , show that on the event .
Conclude , a.s.
Here you are asked to find a more precise description of the modulus of continuity of Brownian paths. Prove that
Hint: Imitate the proof of Theorem 7.1.
The following is part of what is known as Chung's law of the iterated logarithm. We will see in Section 40.3 that there exists such that
for sufficiently large. Prove that
Let be a one-dimensional Brownian motion. We will see in Section 40.3 that there exists such that
if is sufficiently large. Prove that
This is the other half of Chung's law of the iterated logarithm. In fact,
Identify and prove (7.6).
A function is Hölder continuous of order at a point if there exists such that for all . Suppose and is a Brownian motion. Show that the event
has probability 0 .
Hint: Imitate the proof of nowhere differentiability, but use more than three time intervals.
Let be a one-dimensional Brownian motion and let (with no absolute value signs). Prove that if , then
This is a complement to Exercise 4.10. Prove that if and is a Brownian motion, then the -variation of , defined in Exercise 4.10 , is finite, a.s.
Hint: Use the fact that the paths of Brownian motion are Hölder continuous of order if .
Let be a Brownian motion and let be the zero set: .
Show there exists a constant not depending on or such that
Use the Markov property of Brownian motion to show that there exists a constant not depending on or such that
Given a Borel measurable subset of , define
In other words, cover by the union of intervals and define the analog of Lebesgue measure. The differences are that we look at but do not require that be one, and we require that none of the intervals be longer than . The quantity is called the Hausdorff measure of with respect to the function . The Hausdorff dimension of a set is defined to be
(For subsets of , we replace the intervals by balls of radius .) As a warm-up to this exercise, prove that the Hausdorff dimension of the standard Cantor set in is .
The purpose of this exercise is to show that if is a Brownian motion and : is the zero set, then the Hausdorff dimension of is no more than .
For each , let be the collection of intervals contained in that intersect . is random.) If is the cardinality of , use Exercise 7.7 to show
Write
Use the Chebyshev inequality and (1) to conclude that the Hausdorff dimension of is less than or equal to , a.s. (We will show that it is at least in Exercise 14.10.)
Suppose is a Brownian motion and . Show that the amount of time Brownian motion spends at the point is zero, i.e., that
for all .
Use the Blumenthal law to show that if is a one-dimensional Brownian motion and is the first time Brownian motion hits , then .
Show by a direct argument that is with probability of unbounded variation on : Let . Show that has mean and variance at most . Conclude that .
Extend Theorem 37.4 to the set .
Show by means of the transformation (37.12) that for positive and the probability is 1 that the process is within the boundary for all sufficiently large . Show that is the probability that it last touches above rather than below.
Let be a Wiener process.
Let be a sequence of positive numbers such that . Prove that then a.s. as .
Prove that almost all sample paths of the Wiener process are Hölder functions with exponent , i.e. on every time interval
(A proof of this statement can be found, e.g., in [12], Theorem 3 on p. 127.) Can the constant in the above result be taken independent of the interval ?
Let be a Wiener process.
Prove that with probability one
(thus the Hölder condition of order fails at the point 0 ).
Using the reasoning carried out in the proof of Theorem 1, prove that the Wiener process has sample paths that a.s. do not satisfy at any point the Hölder condition with exponent .
Theorem 1 (Paley-Wiener-Zygmund). With probability one the sample paths of Brownian motion are not differentiable at any point of the half-line .
Derive the result of Exercise 5 from Theorem 19 of Chapter II and the property that for
Recall that for a set may coincide with , where is a pseudometric space, an -net is a set such that for every there exists an element for which . In other words, is covered by the closed balls
If has a finite -net, then we call a minimal -net any of its -nets such that is minimal, where denotes the number of elements of a finite set . Put , emphasizing the dependence on the pseudometric as well.
Following [153], we introduce two conditions on the space ( ). Suppose there exist and such that for each with diameter and any
Suppose there exists such that for any minimal -net
where is defined according to (II.53).
Theorem 19 of Chapter II (see [153; p. 134]). Let be a random function with values in a Polish space ( ) for each , defined on some and a pseudometric space satisfying conditions (II.55) and (II.56). Suppose that for some , and
Then has a modification with continuous sample paths such that for any
and for each
Let be a standard Wiener process and let be the event that has no zero in the interval .
If , show that .
If and , show that
Deduce that, if and , then .
Let be a standard Wiener process. Show that
Set and and use the Borel-Cantelli lemma to show that a.s. as .
Let be a standard Wiener process, , and let . Show that is a null set (i.e. has Lebesgue measure zero) with probability one.
Let , where is a standard Wiener process. Show that is attained at exactly one point in , with probability one.
Show that the total variation of a standard Wiener process over any non-trivial interval does not exist. [The total variation of a function over the bounded interval is defined as
where the supremum is taken over all increasing sequences . You may find it useful that the quadratic variation of the Wiener process exists and is non-zero almost surely.]
Prove that the Wiener process is not differentiable in probability.
Let be a Wiener process. Prove that with probability 1 its trajectory has unbounded variation on an arbitrary interval , i.e., that
where is a partition of the interval .
Let be a Wiener process. For each consider partitions of the interval with points
and
Set
Find the mean-square (i.e., ) limit of the quantities as .
Let the sequence of positive numbers be such that . Prove that then a.s. as increases. Here is a Wiener process.
Let be a Wiener process. Prove that for any , with probability 1 we have
Thus, the quantity is well defined.
Let be a Wiener process, and let . Find
Let be a Brownian motion with continuous sample paths. Define as the smallest at which the sample path achieves its maximum value, . (Note: is not a stopping time.) Follow these steps to show that the sets for is a family suitable for the construction in Example .
Example 2: given any uncountable partition of into -measurable sets with for every (``a family suitable for the construction''), one can build a badly-behaved modification of , equal to almost surely at each fixed and satisfying the same finite-dimensional distributions, but with nonmeasurable, by reassigning to an arbitrarily large nonmeasurable value on each .
Show that . Deduce that is -measurable. Hint: Work with the process at rational times.
For each in , show that . Deduce via the result from Exercise (the first time a standard Brownian motion hits a fixed positive level has density with respect to Lebesgue measure on , so it takes any particular value with probability zero) that .
Use Problem [6] to show that .
Prove that a Wiener process is not differentiable in probability.
Prove that almost all trajectories of a Wiener process are nowhere differentiable.
Let be a be a continuous function such that for all . Show that for all , and conclude that .
Use the LIL (Corollary 12.2) to give an alternative proof for the fact that a one - dimensional Brownian motion oscillates in every time interval infinitely often around its starting point.
Show that is almost surely not - Hölder continuous:
For all and we have
Define and show that for each one has . For this, use the lower bound in a) and consider the complement of the set .
Conclude from the previous part, that is a.s. not - Hölder continuous.
The proof of Theorem 10.3 actually shows, that almost all Brownian paths are nowhere Lipschitz continuous. Modify the argument of this proof to show that almost all Brownian paths are nowhere Hölder continuous for all . Why does the argument break down for ?
Use Theorem 10.6 to show that the strong - variation of is for finite.
Let be a one - dimensional Brownian motion. Show that
Let be a and denote by the last zero before time .
Use Theorem 11.25 to give a further proof of Lévy's arc - sine law (cf. Theorem 6.20): for all .
Find the conditional density .
Integrate the formula appearing in Theorem 11.25 to get
and give a probabilistic interpretation of this identity.
Show that Corollary 11.26 also follows from Lemma 11.23.