Chapter III

Brownian Motion. Properties of Sample Paths

[27/0%]
LaTeX
Problem III.1

Take the sets Tn={k2−n+1,k=0,…,2n−1}T_{n} = \left\{ k 2^{-n+1}, k = 0, \ldots , 2^{n-1}\right\}, n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}. Suppose that on some probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}) an array of independent standard Gaussian random variables {Xn,k,k∈Tn,n∈N}\left\{ X_{n, k}, k \in T_{n}, n \in \mathbb {N}\right\} is given.

Define inductively the processes Bn={Bn(t),t∈[0,1]}B_{n} = \left\{ B_{n}(t), t \in [0,1]\right\}, n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}. Put B1(t)=tX1,1B_{1}(t) = t X_{1,1}, t∈[0,1]t \in [0,1]. Thus on the set T1T_{1} we have B1(0)=0B_{1}(0) = 0 and B1(1)=X1,1B_{1}(1) = X_{1,1}, and for t∈(0,1)t \in (0,1) we perform linear interpolation of the values of B1B_{1} at the endpoints of the interval [0,1][0,1]. Assuming the process BnB_{n} has been defined, we introduce the process Bn+1B_{n+1} as follows. Let

Bn+1(t)=Bn(t)fort∈Tn. B_{n+1}(t) = B_{n}(t) \quad \text{for} \quad t \in T_{n}.

If t=k2−n∈Tn+1∖Tnt = k 2^{-n} \in T_{n+1} \setminus T_{n}, then put

Bn+1(t)=12(Bn(t−2−n)+Bn(t+2−n))+2−(n+1)/2Xn+1,k.(45) B_{n+1}(t) = \frac{1}{2}\left(B_{n}(t-2^{-n})+B_{n}(t+2^{-n})\right)+2^{-(n+1)/2} X_{n+1, k}. \tag {45}

Thus the process Bn+1B_{n+1} is defined on the set Tn+1T_{n+1}. At the remaining points of the interval [0,1][0,1] we define Bn+1B_{n+1} by linear interpolation through the nodes (t,Bn+1(t))(t, B_{n+1}(t)), where t∈Tn+1t \in T_{n+1}. Thus the processes BnB_{n} are continuous on [0,1][0,1] for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N} and ω∈Ω\omega \in \Omega.

The series

B1(t,ω)+∑n=1∞(Bn+1(t,ω)−Bn(t,ω)) B_{1}(t, \omega )+\sum _{n = 1}^{\infty }\left(B_{n+1}(t, \omega )-B_{n}(t, \omega )\right)

for a.e. ω\omega converges uniformly on the interval [0,1][0,1]. By the Weierstrass theorem this series defines a.s. on [0,1][0,1] a continuous function B(t)B(t).

Find E[Bn(t)]\mathbb {E}\left[B_{n}(t)\right] and cov⁡(Bn(s),Bn(t))\operatorname {cov}\left(B_{n}(s), B_{n}(t)\right) for s,t∈[0,1]s, t \in [0,1] and n⩾0n \geqslant 0. Prove that B(t)B(t) is a Gaussian process with E[B(t)]=0\mathbb {E}\left[B(t)\right] = 0 and cov⁡(B(s),B(t))=min⁡{s,t}\operatorname {cov}(B(s), B(t)) = \min \left\{ s, t\right\} for s,t∈[0,1]s, t \in [0,1].

?
Problem III.2

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process.

Let {tn}n⩾1\left\{ t_{n}\right\}_{n \geqslant 1} be a sequence of positive numbers such that ∑n=1∞tn−1/2<∞\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty } t_{n}^{-1 / 2} < \infty. Prove that then ∣W(tn)∣→∞\left|W\left(t_{n}\right)\right| \rightarrow \infty a.s. as n→∞n \rightarrow \infty.

?
Problem III.3

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process.

Consider a sequence Πn,n∈N\Pi_{n}, n \in \mathbb {N}, of refining partitions (tm(n))\left(t_{m}^{(n)}\right) of the interval [0,t][0, t] by points of the special form tm(n)=tm2−n,m=0,…,2nt_{m}^{(n)} = t m 2^{-n}, m = 0, \ldots , 2^{n}. Then

∑m=02n−1(W(tm+1(n))−W(tm(n)))2→t a.s. as n→∞ \sum _{m = 0}^{2^{n}-1}\left(W\left(t_{m+1}^{(n)}\right)-W\left(t_{m}^{(n)}\right)\right)^{2} \rightarrow t \text{ a.s. as } n \rightarrow \infty
?
Problem III.4

Show that assertion (47) on a.s. convergence need not hold if one takes arbitrary refining partitions Πn,n∈N\Pi_{n}, n \in \mathbb {N}, of the interval [0,1][0,1] by points tm(n),m=0,…,Nn(n∈N)t_{m}^{(n)}, m = 0, \ldots , N_{n}(n \in \mathbb {N}), for which

max⁡0⩽m⩽Nn(tm+1(n)−tm(n))→0 as n→∞ \max _{0 \leqslant m \leqslant N_{n}}\left(t_{m+1}^{(n)}-t_{m}^{(n)}\right) \rightarrow 0 \text{ as } n \rightarrow \infty

(but convergence in probability will nevertheless take place).

Assertion (47) (Exercise 3): let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process; consider a sequence Πn,n∈N\Pi_{n}, n \in \mathbb {N}, of refining partitions (tm(n))\left(t_{m}^{(n)}\right) of the interval [0,t][0, t] by points of the special form tm(n)=tm2−n,m=0,…,2nt_{m}^{(n)} = t m 2^{-n}, m = 0, \ldots , 2^{n}. Then

∑m=02n−1(W(tm+1(n))−W(tm(n)))2→t a.s. as n→∞(47) \sum _{m = 0}^{2^{n}-1}\left(W\left(t_{m+1}^{(n)}\right)-W\left(t_{m}^{(n)}\right)\right)^{2} \rightarrow t \text{ a.s. as } n \rightarrow \infty \tag {47}
?
Problem III.5

Prove that almost all sample paths of the Wiener process are Hölder functions with exponent γ<1/2\gamma < 1 / 2, i.e. on every time interval [a,b]⊂[0,∞)[a, b] \subset [0, \infty )

∣W(t)−W(s)∣⩽Cγ∣t−s∣γ,s,t∈[a,b],Cγ=const>0 \left|W(t)-W(s)\right| \leqslant C_{\gamma }\left|t-s\right|^{\gamma }, \quad s, t \in [a, b], \quad C_{\gamma } = \mathrm{const} > 0

(A proof of this statement can be found, e.g., in [12], Theorem 3 on p. 127.) Can the constant CγC_{\gamma } in the above result be taken independent of the interval [a,b][a, b] ?

?
Problem III.6

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process.

Prove that with probability one

lim sup⁡t→0+W(t)/t1/2=∞ \limsup _{t \rightarrow 0+} W(t) / t^{1 / 2} = \infty

(thus the Hölder condition of order 1/21 / 2 fails at the point 0 ).

?
Problem III.7

Using the reasoning carried out in the proof of Theorem 1, prove that the Wiener process W={W(t),0⩽t⩽1}W = \left\{ W(t), 0 \leqslant t \leqslant 1\right\} has sample paths that a.s. do not satisfy at any point the Hölder condition with exponent γ>1/2\gamma > 1 / 2.

Theorem 1 (Paley-Wiener-Zygmund). With probability one the sample paths of Brownian motion W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} are not differentiable at any point tt of the half-line [0,∞)[0, \infty ).

?
Problem III.8

Derive the result of Exercise 5 from Theorem 19 of Chapter II and the property that for q∈N,0⩽s<t<∞q \in \mathbb {N}, 0 \leqslant s < t < \infty

E[(W(t)−W(s))2q]=(2q−1)!!(t−s)q \mathbb {E}\left[(W(t)-W(s))^{2 q}\right] = (2 q-1) ! !(t-s)^{q}

Recall that for a set U⊂T(UU \subset T(U may coincide with T)T), where (T,δ)(T, \delta ) is a pseudometric space, an ε\varepsilon-net is a set Sε⊂TS_{\varepsilon } \subset T such that for every t∈Ut \in U there exists an element s∈Sεs \in S_{\varepsilon } for which δ(s,t)⩽ε\delta (s, t) \leqslant \varepsilon. In other words, UU is covered by the closed balls

Bε(s)={t∈T:δ(s,t)⩽ε},s∈Sε(II.53) B_{\varepsilon }(s) = \left\{ t \in T: \delta (s, t) \leqslant \varepsilon \right\} , \quad s \in S_{\varepsilon } \tag {II.53}

If UU has a finite ε\varepsilon-net, then we call a minimal ε\varepsilon-net any of its ε\varepsilon-nets Sεmin⁡(U)S_{\varepsilon }^{\min }(U) such that (Sεmin⁡(U))\left(S_{\varepsilon }^{\min }(U)\right) is minimal, where (V)(V) denotes the number of elements of a finite set VV. Put Nδ(ε,U)=#(Sεmin⁡(U))N_{\delta }(\varepsilon , U) = \# \left(S_{\varepsilon }^{\min }(U)\right), emphasizing the dependence on the pseudometric δ\delta as well.

Following [153], we introduce two conditions on the space ( T,δT, \delta ). Suppose there exist d∈Nd \in \mathbb {N} and a>0a > 0 such that for each U⊂TU \subset T with diameter DU:=sup⁡{δ(s,t):s,t∈U}<∞D_{U}: = \sup \left\{ \delta (s, t): s, t \in U\right\} < \infty and any ε>0\varepsilon > 0

Nδ(ε,U)⩽max⁡{a(DU/ε)d,1}(II.55) N_{\delta }(\varepsilon , U) \leqslant \max \left\{ a\left(D_{U} / \varepsilon \right)^{d}, 1\right\} \tag {II.55}

Suppose there exists b>0b > 0 such that for any minimal ε\varepsilon-net Sεmin⁡(T)S_{\varepsilon }^{\min }(T)

#(Sεmin⁡(T)∩B5ε(t))⩽b for all t∈Sεmin⁡(T)(II.56) \# \left(S_{\varepsilon }^{\min }(T) \cap B_{5 \varepsilon }(t)\right) \leqslant b \text{ for all } t \in S_{\varepsilon }^{\min }(T) \tag {II.56}

where B5ε(t)B_{5 \varepsilon }(t) is defined according to (II.53).

Theorem 19 of Chapter II (see [153; p. 134]). Let X={X(t),t∈T}X = \left\{ X(t), t \in T\right\} be a random function with values in a Polish space ( S,ρ\mathrm{S}, \rho ) for each t∈Tt \in T, defined on some (Ω,F,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}) and a pseudometric space (T,δ)(T, \delta ) satisfying conditions (II.55) and (II.56). Suppose that for some γ∈(0,1)\gamma \in (0,1), α>d/γ\alpha > d / \gamma and β>0\beta > 0

E[(ρ(X(t),X(s)))α]⩽β(δ(t,s))αγ for all s,t∈T(II.57) \mathbb {E}\left[(\rho (X(t), X(s)))^{\alpha }\right] \leqslant \beta (\delta (t, s))^{\alpha \gamma } \quad \text{ for all } \quad s, t \in T \tag {II.57}

Then XX has a modification Y={Y(t),t∈T}Y = \left\{ Y(t), t \in T\right\} with continuous sample paths such that for any λ∈(0,γ−d/α)\lambda \in (0, \gamma -d / \alpha )

lim⁡ν↓0sup⁡δ(t,s)⩽νρ(Y(t),Y(s))/δλ(t,s)=0 a.s. (II.58) \lim _{\nu \downarrow 0} \sup _{\delta (t, s) \leqslant \nu } \rho (Y(t), Y(s)) / \delta ^{\lambda }(t, s) = 0 \quad \text{ a.s. } \tag {II.58}

and for each t0∈Tt_{0} \in T

E[sup⁡t∈Tρ(Y(t),Y(t0))α]⩽a(2βDT)αγ/(2γ−d/α−1)α(II.59) \mathbb {E}\left[\sup _{t \in T} \rho \left(Y(t), Y\left(t_{0}\right)\right)^{\alpha }\right] \leqslant a\left(2 \beta D_{T}\right)^{\alpha \gamma } /\left(2^{\gamma -d / \alpha }-1\right)^{\alpha } \tag {II.59}
?
Problem III.9

Construct an example of a real-valued process X={X(t),t⩾0}X = \left\{ X(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} of càdlàg type (but not continuous) and a closed set F⊂RF \subset \mathbb {R} such that τ∞<τF\tau_{\infty } < \tau_{F} a.s., where τ∞\tau_{\infty } and τF\tau_{F} are defined in the proof of Theorem 3.

Theorem 3. Let X={X(t),t⩾0}X = \left\{ X(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a random function taking values (for each t⩾0t \geqslant 0) in a metric space (S,ρ)(\mathrm{S}, \rho ). Suppose the sample paths of XX are almost surely continuous. Then for every closed set F⊂SF \subset \mathrm{S} the time

τF(ω)=inf⁡{t⩾0:X(t,ω)∈F}(7) \tau _{F}(\omega ) = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 0: X(t, \omega ) \in F\right\} \tag {7}

is a Markov time with respect to the natural filtration FX\mathbb {F}^{X} of the process XX (it is assumed that τF(ω)=∞\tau_{F}(\omega ) = \infty if X(t,ω)∉FX(t, \omega ) \notin F for all t⩾0t \geqslant 0).

In the proof of Theorem 3 one sets τn:=τGn=inf⁡{t⩾0:X(t,ω)∈Gn}\tau_{n} := \tau_{G_{n}} = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 0: X(t, \omega ) \in G_{n}\right\}, where the open sets Gn={x∈S:ρ(x,F)<1/n}G_{n} = \left\{ x \in \mathrm{S}: \rho (x, F) < 1 / n\right\} form, as nn grows, shrinking neighborhoods of FF. Clearly, F⊂Gn+1⊂GnF \subset G_{n+1} \subset G_{n}, whence τn(ω)⩽τn+1(ω)⩽τF(ω)\tau_{n}(\omega ) \leqslant \tau_{n+1}(\omega ) \leqslant \tau_{F}(\omega ) for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}, ω∈Ω\omega \in \Omega. Therefore for each ω\omega there exists

lim⁡n→∞τn(ω)=τ∞(ω)⩽τF(ω)∈[0,∞]. \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \tau _{n}(\omega ) = \tau _{\infty }(\omega ) \leqslant \tau _{F}(\omega ) \in [0, \infty ].
?
Problem III.10

Let X={Xn,n∈N}X = \left\{ X_{n}, n \in \mathbb {N}\right\} be a sequence of real-valued random variables and let a set B∈B(R)B \in \mathscr {B}(\mathbb {R}) be given. Let τ=τ(ω)\tau = \tau (\omega ) be the first hitting time of the set BB, defined by formula (I.49).

Formula (I.49):

τ(ω)=inf⁡{n∈N:Xn(ω)∈B}(I.49) \tau (\omega ) = \inf \left\{ n \in \mathbb {N}: X_{n}(\omega ) \in B\right\} \tag {I.49}

(τ(ω):=∞\tau (\omega ) := \infty if Xn(ω)∉BX_{n}(\omega ) \notin B for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}).

We have already seen (see §3) that τ\tau is a Markov time with respect to the natural filtration of the process XX. Now introduce

σ(ω)=inf⁡{n∈N:Xn(ω)∉B} — the time of the first exit from B,γ(ω)=sup⁡{n∈N:Xn(ω)∈B} — the time of the last stay in B \begin{aligned} & \sigma (\omega ) = \inf \left\{ n \in \mathbb {N}: X_{n}(\omega ) \notin B\right\} \text{ — the time of the first exit from } B, \\ & \gamma (\omega ) = \sup \left\{ n \in \mathbb {N}: X_{n}(\omega ) \in B\right\} \text{ — the time of the last stay in } B \end{aligned}

(in the definition of the times τ\tau and σ\sigma it is assumed that if the set in curly braces is empty for some point ω\omega, then the value of the quantity under consideration at this point is taken to be +∞+\infty ). Prove that σ\sigma is a Markov time with respect to the natural filtration of the process XX. Construct an example of a sequence XX and a set BB for which the time γ\gamma is a Markov time with respect to the natural filtration, and also an example of XX and BB for which γ\gamma is not such a time.

?
Problem III.11

Let τ\tau be a Markov time with respect to a filtration of σ\sigma-algebras (Ft)t∈T(\mathscr {F}_{t})_{t \in T}. Put

Fτ={A∈F:A∩{τ⩽t}∈Ft for every t∈T}.(12) \mathscr {F}_{\tau } = \left\{ A \in \mathscr {F}: A \cap \left\{ \tau \leqslant t\right\} \in \mathscr {F}_{t} \text{ for every } t \in T\right\} . \tag {12}

The system of sets Fτ\mathscr {F}_{\tau } is (as is easy to check) a σ\sigma-algebra, called the σ\sigma-algebra of events observable up to the random time τ\tau (inclusive).

Let X={X(t),t∈T},T⊂RX = \left\{ X(t), t \in T\right\} , T \subset \mathbb {R}, be a real-valued stochastic process and let FT\mathbb {F}_{T} be its natural filtration. Let τ=τ(ω)\tau = \tau (\omega ) be a Markov time with respect to this filtration; if τ(ω)=∞\tau (\omega ) = \infty, we set X(τ(ω),ω)=0X(\tau (\omega ), \omega ) = 0. Can one assert that X(τ(ω),ω)X(\tau (\omega ), \omega ) is an Fτ∣B(R)\mathscr {F}_{\tau } \mid \mathscr {B}(\mathbb {R})-measurable random variable? What can be said in the case T=NT = \mathbb {N} ?

?
Problem III.12

Set τa=inf⁡{t>0:W(t)=a}\tau_{a} = \inf \left\{ t > 0: W(t) = a\right\}, where W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} is a Wiener process, a∈Ra \in \mathbb {R}. Prove that τa=Da2τ1\tau_{a} \stackrel{\mathscr {D}}{ = } a^{2} \tau_{1}, i.e. the distributions of the random variables τa\tau_{a} and a2τ1a^{2} \tau_{1} coincide: Law⁡(τa)=Law⁡(a2τ1)\operatorname {Law}\left(\tau_{a}\right) = \operatorname {Law}\left(a^{2} \tau_{1}\right).

?
Problem III.13

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process.

Let UU be the largest zero of the process WW on the interval [0,t][0, t]. Prove that the distribution of the random variable UU obeys the arcsine law:

P(U⩽x)=2πarcsin⁡xt,x∈[0,t] \mathbb {P}\left(U \leqslant x\right) = \frac{2}{\pi } \arcsin \sqrt{\frac{x}{t}}, \quad x \in [0, t]
?
Problem III.14

Prove Wald's second identity: let Var⁡[ξ1]<∞\operatorname {Var}\left[\xi_{1}\right] < \infty in addition to the conditions of Theorem 11; then

E[(Sτ−τE[ξ1])2]=E[τ]Var⁡[ξ1] \mathbb {E}\left[\left(S_{\tau }-\tau \mathbb {E}\left[\xi _{1}\right]\right)^{2}\right] = \mathbb {E}\left[\tau \right] \operatorname {Var}\left[\xi _{1}\right]

Theorem 11 (Wald's first identity). Let ξ1,ξ2,…\xi_{1}, \xi_{2}, \ldots be independent identically distributed random variables, Sn=∑k=1nξkS_{n} = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} \xi_{k}, and let τ\tau be a Markov time with respect to the filtration of σ\sigma-algebras Fn=σ{ξ1,…,ξn},n∈N\mathscr {F}_{n} = \sigma \left\{ \xi_{1}, \ldots , \xi_{n}\right\} , n \in \mathbb {N}, where E[∣ξ1∣]<∞\mathbb {E}\left[\left|\xi_{1}\right|\right] < \infty and E[τ]<∞\mathbb {E}\left[\tau \right] < \infty. Then

E[Sτ]=E[τ]E[ξ1] \mathbb {E}\left[S_{\tau }\right] = \mathbb {E}\left[\tau \right] \mathbb {E}\left[\xi _{1}\right]

where Sτ(ω)(ω)=∑k=1τ(ω)ξk(ω)S_{\tau (\omega )}(\omega ) = \sum_{k = 1}^{\tau (\omega )} \xi_{k}(\omega ) for ω∈{τ<∞}\omega \in \left\{ \tau < \infty \right\}, and we set Sτ(ω)(ω)=0S_{\tau (\omega )}(\omega ) = 0 for ω∈{τ=∞}\omega \in \left\{ \tau = \infty \right\}.

?
Problem III.15

Let X=X(ω)X = X(\omega ) be a centered random variable on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}) with E[X2]<∞\mathbb {E}\left[X^{2}\right] < \infty. Take, on (Ω′,F′,P′)\left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathscr {F}^{\prime }, \mathbb {P}^{\prime }\right), a Brownian motion W={W(t,ω′),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W\left(t, \omega^{\prime }\right), t \geqslant 0\right\}. Extend XX and WW to (Ω,F,P)⊗(Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}) \otimes \left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathscr {F}^{\prime }, \mathbb {P}^{\prime }\right) according to (I.46).

Formula (I.46). Let (Ω′,F′,P′)\left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathscr {F}^{\prime }, \mathbb {P}^{\prime }\right) be some other probability space. Define a new probability space (Ω~,F~,P~)(\widetilde{\Omega }, \widetilde{\mathscr {F}}, \widetilde{\mathbb {P}}) by setting Ω~=Ω×Ω′\widetilde{\Omega } = \Omega \times \Omega^{\prime }, F~=F⊗F′\widetilde{\mathscr {F}} = \mathscr {F} \otimes \mathscr {F}^{\prime }, P~=P⊗P′\widetilde{\mathbb {P}} = \mathbb {P} \otimes \mathbb {P}^{\prime }. If X={Xt(ω),t∈T}X = \left\{ X_{t}(\omega ), t \in T\right\} is a stochastic process on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}), then it can naturally be regarded as defined also on (Ω~,F~,P~)(\widetilde{\Omega }, \widetilde{\mathscr {F}}, \widetilde{\mathbb {P}}). Indeed, for ω~=(ω,ω′)\widetilde{\omega } = \left(\omega , \omega^{\prime }\right) set

X~t(ω~)=Xt(ω),t∈T(I.46) \widetilde{X}_{t}(\widetilde{\omega }) = X_{t}(\omega ), \quad t \in T \tag {I.46}

Introduce τ(ω,ω′)=inf⁡{t⩾1:W(t,ω′)=X(ω)}\tau \left(\omega , \omega^{\prime }\right) = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 1: W\left(t, \omega^{\prime }\right) = X(\omega )\right\}. Then W(τ)=XW(\tau ) = X. Prove that in this case E~τ=∞\widetilde{\mathrm{E}} \tau = \infty, where E~\widetilde{\mathrm{E}} denotes averaging with respect to the measure P⊗P′\mathbb {P} \otimes \mathbb {P}^{\prime }.

?
Problem III.16

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process, a<0<ba < 0 < b, and

τa,b=inf⁡{t⩾0:W(t)∈{a,b}} \tau _{a, b} = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 0: W(t) \in \left\{ a, b\right\} \right\}

Define the random variables ξn,m=W(m/n)−W((m−1)/n),m,n∈N\xi_{n, m} = W(m / n)-W((m-1) / n), m, n \in \mathbb {N}, and set

τa,b(n)=inf⁡{m:ξn,1+⋯+ξn,m∉(a,b)} \tau _{a, b}^{(n)} = \inf \left\{ m: \xi _{n, 1}+\cdots +\xi _{n, m} \notin (a, b)\right\}

Prove that the following property holds: τa,b(n)/n→τa,b\tau_{a, b}^{(n)} / n \rightarrow \tau_{a, b} a.s. as n→∞n \rightarrow \infty.

?
Problem III.17

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process, a<0<ba < 0 < b, and

τa,b=inf⁡{t⩾0:W(t)∈{a,b}} \tau _{a, b} = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 0: W(t) \in \left\{ a, b\right\} \right\}

Define the random variables ξn,m=W(m/n)−W((m−1)/n),m,n∈N\xi_{n, m} = W(m / n)-W((m-1) / n), m, n \in \mathbb {N}, and set

τa,b(n)=inf⁡{m:ξn,1+⋯+ξn,m∉(a,b)} \tau _{a, b}^{(n)} = \inf \left\{ m: \xi _{n, 1}+\cdots +\xi _{n, m} \notin (a, b)\right\}

Prove that the family of random variables {W(τa,b(n)/n),n∈N}\left\{ W\left(\tau_{a, b}^{(n)} / n\right), n \in \mathbb {N}\right\} is uniformly integrable.

?
Problem III.18

Let a centered nondegenerate random variable XX with distribution function F(x)=P(X⩽x)F(x) = \mathbb {P}\left(X \leqslant x\right) and a Wiener process W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be given on a probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}). For y<0<zy < 0 < z set τy,z=inf⁡{t⩾0:W(t)∈{y,z}}\tau_{y, z} = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 0: W(t) \in \left\{ y, z\right\} \right\}, and also τ0,b=0\tau_{0, b} = 0 for b>0b > 0. Let

c=∫(−∞,0](−y)dF(y)=∫(0,∞)zdF(z)≠0 c = \int _{(-\infty , 0]}(-y) d F(y) = \int _{(0, \infty )} z d F(z) \neq 0

On some probability space (Ω′,F′,P′)\left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathscr {F}^{\prime }, \mathbb {P}^{\prime }\right) construct a random vector (Y,Z)(Y, Z) with values in R2\mathbb {R}^{2} such that

P′((Y,Z)∈B)=c−1∬B∩{(−∞,0]×(0,∞)}(z−y)dF(y)dF(z),B∈B(R2). \mathbb {P}^{\prime }\left((Y, Z) \in B\right) = c^{-1} \iint _{B \cap \left\{ (-\infty , 0] \times (0, \infty )\right\} }(z-y) d F(y) d F(z), \quad B \in \mathscr {B}\left(\mathbb {R}^{2}\right) .

Take the probability space (Ω~,F~,P~)=(Ω,F,P)⊗(Ω′,F′,P′)(\widetilde{\Omega }, \widetilde{\mathscr {F}}, \widetilde{\mathbb {P}}) = (\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}) \otimes \left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathscr {F}^{\prime }, \mathbb {P}^{\prime }\right) and for ω~=(ω,ω′)∈Ω~,t⩾0\widetilde{\omega } = \left(\omega , \omega^{\prime }\right) \in \widetilde{\Omega }, t \geqslant 0 set

X~(ω~)=X(ω),W~(t,ω~)=W(t,ω). \widetilde{X}(\widetilde{\omega }) = X(\omega ), \quad \widetilde{W}(t, \widetilde{\omega }) = W(t, \omega ) .

Show that on (Ω~,F~,P~)(\widetilde{\Omega }, \widetilde{\mathscr {F}}, \widetilde{\mathbb {P}})

τ(ω~):=τY(ω′),Z(ω′)(ω) \tau (\widetilde{\omega }): = \tau _{Y\left(\omega ^{\prime }\right), Z\left(\omega ^{\prime }\right)}(\omega )

is a random variable, and W~={W~(t),t⩾0}\widetilde{W} = \left\{ \widetilde{W}(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} is a Brownian motion.

?
Problem III.19

Let P\mathbb {P} and Q\mathbb {Q} be probability measures on a metric space (S,B(S))(\mathrm{S}, \mathscr {B}(\mathrm{S})). Suppose that for every continuous bounded function f:S→R+f: \mathrm{S} \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{+}

∫Sf(x)P(dx)=∫Sf(x)Q(dx) \int _{\mathrm{S}} f(x) \mathbb {P}\left(d x\right) = \int _{\mathrm{S}} f(x) \mathbb {Q}\left(d x\right)

Then P=Q\mathbb {P} = \mathbb {Q} on B(S)\mathscr {B}(\mathrm{S}).

?
Problem III.20

Let W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Wiener process, a<0<ba < 0 < b, and τa,b=inf⁡{t⩾0:W(t)∈{a,b}}\tau_{a, b} = \inf \left\{ t \geqslant 0: W(t) \in \left\{ a, b\right\} \right\}.

Using Wald's second identity (Exercise 14), prove that

E[τa,b]=−ab \mathbb {E}\left[\tau _{a, b}\right] = -a b
?
Problem III.21

Definition 7. A process W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} is called a real Brownian motion with respect to a filtration (F)t⩾0(\mathscr {F})_{t \geqslant 0} if

  1. W(t)W(t) is an Ft\mathscr {F}_{t}-measurable variable for each t⩾0t \geqslant 0;

  2. (W(t)−W(s))  ⊥ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣⊥  Fs\left(W(t)-W(s)\right) \; \perp \! \! \! \perp \; \mathscr {F}_{s} for 0⩽s<t0 \leqslant s < t (i.e. W(t)−W(s)W(t)-W(s) is independent of Fs\mathscr {F}_{s});

  3. W0=0W_{0} = 0 a.s. and W(t)−W(s)∼N(0,t−s)W(t)-W(s) \sim \mathrm{N}(0, t-s) for 0⩽s<t0 \leqslant s < t;

  4. the sample paths of the process WW are continuous a.s.

Let N\mathscr {N} be the class of events of zero probability of the (complete) probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mathbb {P}). Without loss of generality we shall assume that in Definition 7 each σ\sigma-algebra Ft(t⩾0)\mathscr {F}_{t}(t \geqslant 0) contains all events from N\mathscr {N}.

Let {(Yn,Zn)}n⩾1\left\{ \left(Y_{n}, Z_{n}\right)\right\}_{n \geqslant 1} be a sequence of independent random vectors with values in R2\mathbb {R}^{2}, and moreover {(Yn,Zn)}n⩾1  ⊥ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣⊥  W\left\{ \left(Y_{n}, Z_{n}\right)\right\}_{n \geqslant 1} \; \perp \! \! \! \perp \; W, where W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} is a Brownian motion (with respect to the filtration (FtW)t⩾0\left(\mathscr {F}_{t}^{W}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} ). For t⩾0t \geqslant 0 set Ht=σ{FtW,{(Yn,Zn)}n⩾1}\mathscr {H}_{t} = \sigma \left\{ \mathscr {F}_{t}^{W}, \left\{ \left(Y_{n}, Z_{n}\right)\right\}_{n \geqslant 1}\right\}, i.e. consider the σ\sigma-algebra generated by the variables W(s)W(s) for s∈[0,t]s \in [0, t] and (Yn,Zn)n⩾1\left(Y_{n}, Z_{n}\right)_{n \geqslant 1}. We shall assume it to be augmented by the class N\mathscr {N} of null events.

Show that WW is a Brownian motion with respect to the filtration (Ht)t⩾0\left(\mathscr {H}_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} introduced above.

?
Problem III.22

Prove that the function appearing on the right-hand side of (79) is a covariance function if and only if H∈(0,1]H \in (0,1].

Formula (79):

R(H)(s,t)=12(s2H+t2H−∣t−s∣2H),s,t⩾0(79) R^{(H)}(s, t) = \frac{1}{2}\left(s^{2 H}+t^{2 H}-\left|t-s\right|^{2 H}\right), \quad s, t \geqslant 0 \tag {79}
?
Problem III.23

Definition 9. A process X={X(t),t⩾0}X = \left\{ X(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} is called a process with stationary increments if for each n⩾1n \geqslant 1, any 0⩽t1<⋯<tn0 \leqslant t_{1} < \cdots < t_{n} and arbitrary h>0h > 0

(X(t2)−X(t1),…,X(tn)−X(tn−1))=D=D(X(t2+h)−X(t1+h),…,X(tn+h)−X(tn−1+h)), \begin{aligned} \left(X\left(t_{2}\right)-X\left(t_{1}\right), \ldots , X\left(t_{n}\right)-X\left(t_{n-1}\right)\right) & \stackrel{\mathscr {D}}{ = } \\ & \stackrel{\mathscr {D}}{ = }\left(X\left(t_{2}+h\right)-X\left(t_{1}+h\right), \ldots , X\left(t_{n}+h\right)-X\left(t_{n-1}+h\right)\right), \end{aligned}

where =D\stackrel{\mathscr {D}}{ = } denotes equality in distribution.

Let X={X(t),t⩾0}X = \left\{ X(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Gaussian process such that for all 0⩽s⩽t<∞0 \leqslant s \leqslant t < \infty

E[X(t)−X(s)]=(t−s)c,Var⁡[X(t)−X(s)]=f(t−s) \mathbb {E}\left[X(t)-X(s)\right] = (t-s) c, \quad \operatorname {Var}\left[X(t)-X(s)\right] = f(t-s)

where c∈Rc \in \mathbb {R}, and f:R+→R+f: \mathbb {R}_{+} \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{+} is a function. Then XX is a process with stationary increments.

?
Problem III.24

Definition 8. Fractal (or fractional) Brownian motion with exponent H∈(0,1]H \in (0,1] is a centered Gaussian process B(H)={B(H)(t),t⩾0}B^{(H)} = \left\{ B^{(H)}(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} with covariance function

R(H)(s,t)=12(s2H+t2H−∣t−s∣2H),s,t⩾0 R^{(H)}(s, t) = \frac{1}{2}\left(s^{2 H}+t^{2 H}-\left|t-s\right|^{2 H}\right), \quad s, t \geqslant 0

Show that for fractional Brownian motion with exponent H∈(0,1]H \in (0,1]

E[(B(H)(s)−B(H)(t))2]=∣s−t∣2H,s,t⩾0. \mathbb {E}\left[(B^{(H)}(s)-B^{(H)}(t))^{2}\right] = \left|s-t\right|^{2 H}, \quad s, t \geqslant 0.
?
Problem III.25

Let (T,ρ)(T, \rho ) be a metric space with some fixed point θ\theta.

Definition 10. A (real) Lévy Brownian function on the set TT is a real Gaussian process BL={BL(t),t∈T}B^{L} = \left\{ B^{L}(t), t \in T\right\} with zero mean and covariance function

RL(s,t)=12(ρ(s,θ)+ρ(t,θ)−ρ(s,t))(82) R^{L}(s, t) = \frac{1}{2}(\rho (s, \theta )+\rho (t, \theta )-\rho (s, t)) \tag {82}

A Gaussian random function X={X(t),t∈T}X = \left\{ X(t), t \in T\right\} is a Lévy Brownian function on TT if and only if X(θ)=0X(\theta ) = 0 a.s. and

E[(X(s)−X(t))2]=ρ(s,t) \mathbb {E}\left[(X(s)-X(t))^{2}\right] = \rho (s, t)

(here the function introduced in (82) is assumed to be nonnegative definite).

?
Problem III.26

Definition 12. A Wiener-Chentsov random field is a real Gaussian function X={X(t),t∈R+d}X = \left\{ X(t), t \in \mathbb {R}_{+}^{d}\right\} such that

E[X(t)]=0 and cov⁡(X(s),X(t))=∏k=1dmin⁡{sk,tk} \mathbb {E}\left[X(t)\right] = 0 \text{ and } \operatorname {cov}(X(s), X(t)) = \prod _{k = 1}^{d} \min \left\{ s_{k}, t_{k}\right\}

where t=(t1,…,td),s=(s1,…,sd)∈R+dt = \left(t_{1}, \ldots , t_{d}\right), s = \left(s_{1}, \ldots , s_{d}\right) \in \mathbb {R}_{+}^{d}.

By the increments of a random field X={Xt,t∈Rd}X = \left\{ X_{t}, t \in \mathbb {R}^{d}\right\} on the class of rectangles (parallelepipeds) B=(a,b]=(a1,b1]×⋯×(ad,bd]⊂RdB = (a, b] = \left(a_{1}, b_{1}\right] \times \cdots \times \left(a_{d}, b_{d}\right] \subset \mathbb {R}^{d} we mean the random functions of the form

X(B)=∑(−1)∥ε∥X(ε1a1+(1−ε1)b1,…,εdad+(1−εd)bd), X(B) = \sum (-1)^{\left\| \varepsilon \right\| } X\left(\varepsilon _{1} a_{1}+\left(1-\varepsilon _{1}\right) b_{1}, \ldots , \varepsilon _{d} a_{d}+\left(1-\varepsilon _{d}\right) b_{d}\right),

where the sum is taken over all vectors ε=(ε1,…,εd)\varepsilon = \left(\varepsilon_{1}, \ldots , \varepsilon_{d}\right) having components 0 or 1, and ∥ε∥=∑k=1dεk\left\| \varepsilon \right\| = \sum_{k = 1}^{d} \varepsilon_{k}.

Let XX be a Wiener-Chentsov field. Prove that {X(B),B∈Π}\left\{ X(B), B \in \Pi \right\}, where Π\Pi is the collection of "rectangles" B=(a,b]⊂R+dB = (a, b] \subset \mathbb {R}_{+}^{d}, is a Gaussian random function. Find its mean and its covariance function. Prove that for any n⩾2n \geqslant 2 and disjoint rectangles B1,…,Bn∈ΠB_{1}, \ldots , B_{n} \in \Pi the variables X(B1),…,X(Bn)X\left(B_{1}\right), \ldots , X\left(B_{n}\right) are independent. Give a definition of the Wiener-Chentsov field in terms of the variables X(B),B∈ΠX(B), B \in \Pi.

?
Problem III.27

Definition 13. The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with parameters α,β>0\alpha , \beta > 0 is the process given by the formula

Vt=e−βtW(αe2βt),t∈R V_{t} = e^{-\beta t} W\left(\alpha e^{2 \beta t}\right), \quad t \in \mathbb {R}

where W={W(t),t⩾0}W = \left\{ W(t), t \geqslant 0\right\} is a standard Brownian motion.

Prove that V={Vt,t∈R}V = \left\{ V_{t}, t \in \mathbb {R}\right\} is a Gaussian process and find its covariance function.

?