Stopping times: definition, measurability and closure properties
[22/27%]Give an example of a random variable and two filtrations and such that is a stopping time w.r.t. the filtration but not w.r.t. .
Let and be stopping times w.r.t. a filtration . Verify that , and are stopping times w.r.t. . Give an example to show that and need not be stopping times w.r.t. .
Let be a random variable taking values in . Show that there is a filtration w.r.t. which is a stopping time.
Let be a filtration.
Show that is a stopping time w.r.t. iff
Show by an example that if a random variable satisfies for all , it need not be a stopping time w.r.t. . (Hint: Consider a of the form
)
Show that defined in (2.6) is a -algebra.
Prove all parts of Proposition 3.8.
Proposition 3.8: Suppose satisfies the usual conditions. Then
-
is a stopping time if and only if for all .
-
If , a.s., then is a stopping time.
-
If and are stopping times, then so are and .
-
If , are stopping times with , then so is .
-
If , are stopping times with , then so is .
-
If and is a stopping time, then so is .
If is defined by (3.2), show is a stopping time for each and .
This exercise gives an alternate definition of which is more appealing, but not as useful. Suppose that satisfies the usual conditions. Show that is equal to the -field generated by the collection of random variables such that is a bounded process with paths that are right continuous with left limits and is adapted to the filtration .
Suppose is a filtration satisfying the usual conditions. Show that if is a stopping time, then is measurable.
Suppose is a filtration satisfying the usual conditions and is a stopping time. Show that if is a measurable random variable with , then is a stopping time.
Suppose is a filtration satisfying the usual conditions. Show that if and are stopping times and is a bounded measurable random variable, then
Hint: Let and . Show the left-hand side is equal to .
Let be a Brownian motion and be the minimal augmented filtration generated by . Let
Show that is not a stopping time with respect to .
Let be a bounded adapted right-continuous process, let , let , a.s., and define by (16.3) for . Show each is a stopping time.
Let be a filtration and an optional time with respect to it. Introduce the -algebra
Can one assert that in relation (51) the -algebra ?
Relation (51) arises in the proof of Lemma 7. Lemma 7: let be a martingale with a.s. right-continuous sample paths, and let and be optional times (with respect to the filtration ) such that a.s., where is a positive constant; then . In the proof one sets , , where denotes the integer part of a number, and
where for a -algebra , and is the class of -null sets.
Let be a stopping rule and be the indicator rv of the event . Show that .
Show that , i.e., show that for each , for each (except perhaps for a set of probability 0).
This is a very simple exercise designed to clarify confusion about the roles of past, present, and future in stopping rules. Let be a sequence of IID binary rv's, each with the pmf , . Let be a positive integer-valued rv that takes on the sample value of the first trial for which . That is, for each ,
Use the definition of stopping trial, Definition 5.5.1 (a stopping trial, or stopping time, for a sequence of rv's is a positive, integer-valued rv such that the indicator function of the event is a function of for each ), to show that is a stopping trial for .
Show that for any given , the rv's and are statistically dependent.
Show that for every , and are statistically dependent.
Show that for every , and are statistically independent.
Show that and are statistically independent. Give the simplest characterization you can of the event .
Show that and are statistically dependent.
Let be a stopping time for the natural filtration generated by a sequence of random variables . Show that .
Let be a process with continuous sample paths, adapted to a filtration . Define , for some closed set . Show that , where denotes the set of rational numbers in . Deduce that is a stopping time for the filtration.
Let be a nondecreasing sequence of -algebras, a sequence of random variables such that is measurable with respect to . Let be an arbitrary Borel set on the line. Prove that the first hitting time of the set : is a Markov time.
Let and be Markov times. Prove that , are also Markov times with respect to the same sequence of -algebras as .
Let and be Markov times. Is the random variable a Markov time?
Let be a and be two stopping times such that .
Show that is a stopping time.
Show that .
Show that .
Deduce from c) that .