Irrationality and transcendence proofs
[28/93%]is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Prove that the sum of the series is irrational if .
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the sum of the series is irrational;
if for all , then the sum of the series is irrational. Is this so in the case ?
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the sum of the series is irrational;
if for all , then the sum of the series is irrational.
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers.
Prove that the sum of the series is irrational, if are the Fermat numbers.
Let the sequence be such that
Prove the rationality of the sum , if for all sufficiently large .
Is the converse statement true? Is the number rational?
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the number is not a quadratic irrational;
if for all , then the number is not a quadratic irrational.
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's. Prove the transcendence of the numbers .
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the number is transcendental;
if for all , then the number is transcendental.
Irrationality of the number . Using the expansions
prove that
the number is irrational;
, if are integers not all equal to zero.
Let be the sum of divisors of a natural number . Prove the irrationality of the sums of the series
;
.
Irrationality of the number .
Let . Prove that , where is an algebraic polynomial of degree at most with integer coefficients.
Deduce from this that (and hence also ) is an irrational number.
Irrationality of the values of the exponential function at rational points.
Let . Prove that , where are algebraic polynomials of degree at most with integer coefficients.
Deduce from this that , if .
Irrationality of the values of the tangent at rational points.
Let . Prove that , where are algebraic polynomials of degree at most with integer coefficients.
Deduce from this that , if .
All three vertices of an equilateral triangle cannot be lattice points.
The decimal fraction
(formed by writing consecutively all the prime numbers) is irrational. [249, 110.]
The number
is irrational.
The number is not only irrational, but it is also not an algebraic number of the second degree, i.e. it cannot satisfy an equation of the form
where are integers and are not all .
If the Euler (Mascheroni) constant were a rational number, then would have to be an integer for all integers from some point onward.
If both and are rational, then must have one of the following five values:
Consider the interior angle included between two contiguous faces of a regular solid and call it
according as the solid is a tetra-, hexa-, octa-, dodeca-, or icosahedron (a hexahedron is a cube). Show that the ratios
are irrational.
Show first, using appropriate spherical triangles, that , , , , .
The numbers are called linearly dependent if there exist rational integers not all zero such that . If no relation of this kind exists then are called linearly independent. Thus, if , the numbers and are linearly dependent or independent according as is rational or irrational. The number is algebraic if there exists an (a positive rational integer) such that are linearly dependent.
The numbers (angles) and are linearly dependent; in fact
(see 197.2; it can be also proved by elementary geometry). Yet and are linearly independent.
(continued). Show that and are linearly independent. Also and are linearly independent, and any linear homogeneous relation with rational coefficients between and can differ only trivially (that is, only by a numerical factor) from the one given in 197.3.
If both and are rational then must have one of the following five values (regarding as ``rational''):
With the exception of the four cases , and 8, is irrational for all positive rational integers .
(continued). From this result derive 197.1 [38.1].
The number
is irrational.
The numbers and are positive; may be rational or irrational and the same holds for , and so there are four possible cases. Show by means of examples that can be rational or irrational in each of these four cases (eight examples are required).
If is rational and is irrational, prove that and are irrational.
Prove that there is no rational number whose square is 12.