Irrationality
[25/96%]Let . Prove the equivalence of the statements
-
;
-
there exist infinitely many irreducible fractions () such that ;
-
there exists a sequence of fractions such that and as .
We use the notation for the fractional part of a real number . Let be an irrational number. Prove that the sequence is dense in .
Prove that the sequences and have no limits;
prove that if the sequence has a limit, then it equals zero and , where .
We use the notation for the fractional part of a real number . Let . Prove the equivalence of the statements
-
;
-
the set is finite.
We use the notation for the fractional part of a real number . Show by examples that the sequence can be everywhere dense, and can be infinite but nowhere dense in .
Find the sets of partial limits of the sequences
;
;
;
;
.
We use the notation for the fractional part of a real number . Find the sets of partial limits of the sequences
, where ;
, where ;
, where ;
.
We use the notation for the fractional part of a real number . Does there exist a real number such that for all indices ?
We use the notation for the fractional part of a real number . Let and . Prove that
Let . Prove that there exist fractions with arbitrarily large denominator () such that
Let . Prove that
;
if a strictly increasing sequence of indices is such that , where is a fixed number, then grows at least like a geometric progression: . Thus the lower bound in inequality a) is crude for most indices.
Let be an algebraic number of degree at most (i.e., is a root of an algebraic polynomial of degree with integer coefficients). Prove Liouville's theorem: if is irrational, then for all and (the positive coefficient depends only on ).
An irrational number is called a Liouville number if it has arbitrarily good approximations by fractions: for any there exists a fraction such that (for examples of such numbers see problem 3.19). Liouville's theorem immediately implies that is a transcendental number.
An irrational number is called a Liouville number if for any there exists a fraction such that . Let be an irrational non-Liouville number: for every fraction , where and are fixed positive numbers (this is possible only for -- see 3.1).
Generalize the result of problem 3.11 b) by proving that this bound is crude for most fractions : if , where and for all , then the sequence grows no slower than a geometric progression (more precisely, ).
Estimate from below the denominators , if the sequence of fractions is such that for all indices
for some and .
Note that, by Liouville's theorem, can be taken to be any irrational algebraic number. Moreover, for almost all real numbers satisfy the inequality for all fractions (see VIII.1.7).
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Prove that the sum of the series is irrational if .
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the sum of the series is irrational;
if for all , then the sum of the series is irrational. Is this so in the case ?
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the sum of the series is irrational;
if for all , then the sum of the series is irrational.
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers.
Prove that the sum of the series is irrational, if are the Fermat numbers.
Let the sequence be such that
Prove the rationality of the sum , if for all sufficiently large .
Is the converse statement true? Is the number rational?
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the number is not a quadratic irrational;
if for all , then the number is not a quadratic irrational.
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's. Prove the transcendence of the numbers .
is an arbitrary sequence of 's and 's, and is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let . Prove that
the number is transcendental;
if for all , then the number is transcendental.
Irrationality of the number . Using the expansions
prove that
the number is irrational;
, if are integers not all equal to zero.
Let be the sum of divisors of a natural number . Prove the irrationality of the sums of the series
;
.
Irrationality of the number .
Let . Prove that , where is an algebraic polynomial of degree at most with integer coefficients.
Deduce from this that (and hence also ) is an irrational number.
Irrationality of the values of the exponential function at rational points.
Let . Prove that , where are algebraic polynomials of degree at most with integer coefficients.
Deduce from this that , if .
Irrationality of the values of the tangent at rational points.
Let . Prove that , where are algebraic polynomials of degree at most with integer coefficients.
Deduce from this that , if .