Density / approximation argument
[48/42%]Suppose .
For , define by . Prove that
For , define by . Prove that
Suppose is a subspace of a normed vector space . Suppose also that is a Banach space and is a bounded linear map.
Prove that there exists a unique continuous function such that
Prove that the function in part (a) is a bounded linear map from to and .
Give an example to show that part (a) can fail if the assumption that is a Banach space is replaced by the assumption that is a normed vector space.
Suppose is a measure, , and . Prove that for every , there exists a simple function such that .
This exercise extends 3.44.
Suppose and . Prove that for every , there exists a step function such that .
This exercise extends 3.47.
Suppose and . Prove that for every , there exists a continuous function such that and the set is bounded.
This exercise extends 3.48.
Suppose and .
For , define by . Prove that the function is bounded and uniformly continuous on .
For , define by . Prove that
Let be nonnegative continuous functions on such that the limit
exists for every . Show that the limit
exists for every continuous function on .
Let and be continuous functions on such that , , for all . Prove that
Let be a continuous real valued function on , and let the function in the complex plane be defined by
Prove that is analytic in the entire plane.
Prove that is the zero function only if is the zero function.
Let be a continuous complex valued function on the interval . Let
for a complex number not in .
Prove that is an analytic function.
Express the coefficients of the Laurent series of about in terms of . Use the result to show that is uniquely determined by .
Let . Prove that .
Let , and there exists such that almost everywhere for . Prove that there exists a sequence such that , and .
Let be an NLS, be a convex dense subset in and . Prove that the set is dense in .
(Yamabe) Let be an NLS, be a convex dense subset in . Prove that .
Let be an NLS, be a Banach space, the linear set is dense in , and . Prove that the operator admits a unique extension , and .
In , define the shift operator
Let , and . Prove that , but .
Let be a Hilbert space, , and .
Prove that there exists such that .
Show that:
is dense in ;
is dense in .
Prove that is dense in each of the spaces
;
Prove that regular generalized functions are dense in .
Prove that regular generalized functions generated by compactly supported infinitely differentiable functions are dense in (that is, is dense in ).
Let . (Recall that for in , letting makes self-adjoint.)
Show that for every in there is a sequence in such that and in .
Recall Proposition 6.13: if is such that and if for , , then for every in , uniformly on .
Let and be as above. If , , show that as . If , show that (weak*).
Let be a sequence in a Hilbert space , and let be a dense subset of . Show that if there exist some such that for , then is a frame for . Thus it suffices to establish the frame condition on some dense (and hopefully "nice") subset of (compare hypothesis (b) of Theorem 7.4).
Show that equations (9.3) and (9.4) hold for every .
Use part (a), together with the fact that is dense in , to show that equations (9.3) and (9.4) hold for every , in the sense of pointwise almost everywhere equality of functions.
Show that is dense in .
The existence of infinitely differentiable, compactly supported functions is demonstrated in Exercise 11.9. Combine Exercises 13.13 and 13.15 with Theorem 13.13 to show that is dense in for , and is dense in with respect to the uniform norm. Conclude that is dense in these spaces for each integer .
Prove that is dense in for any domain .
Find the orthogonal complements in of the following sets:
the polynomials in ;
the polynomials in ;
the polynomials with zero free term;
the polynomials with sum of coefficients equal to zero.
Let . Prove that
if for , then ;
if for all , then is a linear function.
Let and for every function vanishing in neighborhoods of the points 0 and 1. Prove that is a linear function.
Let ( ) be a measure space, let be a nonnegative function that is integrable over , and let . Prove that there exists a set such that and a simple function that vanishes outside of and satisfies and .
Let be Banach spaces, let , let be a bounded sequence in , and suppose that for all in a dense subset of . Prove or disprove: .
Let denote a properly integrable function on . There exist to every positive number two step-functions, and , such that for the entire interval
and
It is even possible to choose and so that their points of discontinuity are equidistant.
The limit relation in Problem 155 is also valid if denotes a properly integrable function on .
Show that the subspace of simple functions is dense in .
Let be a dense subset of . Show that if , then .
With the notations of Exercise 11, suppose and . Prove that there exists a continuous function on such that .
Hint: Let be a suitable partition of , define
if .
Assume on , and prove that there are polynomials such that
(Compare with Exercise 12, Chap. 6).
A step function is, by definition, a finite linear combination of characteristic functions of bounded intervals in . Assume , and prove that there is a sequence of step functions so that
Suppose is a sequence of bounded linear transformations from a normed linear space to a Banach space , suppose for all , and suppose there is a dense set such that converges for each . Prove that converges for each .
Let be such that exists, is finite. Further suppose that for every . Then -a.e. on . [Work from indicators to simple functions, then to nonnegative functions, then to general integrable functions.]
Here we will show that the collection of continuous functions with compact support is dense in , where the notion of distance is as given in the previous exercise. That is, given and , there is such that . Work in the following stages.
, where is a bounded Lebesgue subset of . [Find compact and bounded open with and ; use the approximation theorem in Section 4.2. Use Urysohn's Lemma in Section 5.7 to find on that is continuous with , on , and on . Argue that for all and on . Show that this gives .]
is a nonnegative finite-valued Lebesgue measurable simple function that is zero outside a bounded set, say , where and are disjoint bounded -sets. [This follows from (a); approximate each by some . Show that approximates .]
is a nonnegative measurable function that is zero outside a bounded set. [Find a nonnegative finite-valued nondecreasing sequence of Lebesgue measurable simple functions as in (b) that are zero outside of some bounded set with . Show that by using DCT. Therefore, may be approximated by the types of functions given in (b).]
is a measurable function that is zero outside a bounded set. [Write as ; use (c). This part shows that may be approximated by functions as given in (c).]
a completely general element of . [Use DCT to show the limit relation . Thus may be approximated by functions of the type given in (d). Here is the open ball centered at the origin with radius .]
Work backward from (e) to (a) to prove the claim given at the beginning of this problem.
Approximation theorem for Lebesgue measure (Section 4.2), the part needed here: given and , there exist a closed set and open set with and ; combined with the analogous statement for , this yields compact and bounded open with and whenever is itself bounded. Urysohn's Lemma (Section 5.7): let , where is closed and is open. Then there exists a continuous function such that (i) for each , (ii) for each , (iii) for each , and (iv) for each . The support of a function is the set ; if this closed set is bounded, and hence compact, we say that has compact support.
The following is an outline of an alternative proof that is a dense subset of (where ) that doesn't use Lusin's Theorem [as was used in Claim 3]. Here denotes the collection of real-valued functions on that are continuous and have compact support, and denotes the collection of -measurable finite-valued simple functions on such that .
Claim 3: Given any bounded and , we can find such that and . In particular, is a dense subset of .
Show that is dense in . [Let be bounded. Find compact and open with and . Use Urysohn's Lemma to find a that is continuous with , on , and on . We have and for every . Then
]
Show that is dense in the collection of nonnegative finite-valued -measurable simple functions on such that each is bounded if . [Without loss of generality, assume that each , so that are bounded. For each , find such that ; this requires the result of (a). Let . Then and it is easy to show that .]
Show that is dense in the class of nonnegative functions in that are zero outside a bounded set. [Show that the functions in (b) are dense in the collection here in (c) as follows: let be in with outside some bounded . Find a nondecreasing sequence of functions in (b) with . Use DCT to show that by using the fact that . Since is dense in the collection of functions in (b), and since the collection of functions in (b) has been shown by this outline here in (c) to be dense in the collection of functions given here in (c), the claim of (c) follows.]
Show that is dense in the class of functions in that are zero outside a bounded set. [Let be zero outside a bounded set, and pick . Write . Both and are nonnegative functions in that are zero outside a bounded set. By (c), there are functions with and both less than . Let . Then and .]
Show that is dense in . [Let . Since , DCT gives . Thus can be approximated by a function in that vanishes outside a bounded set. Since (d) says that is dense in the class of functions in that vanish outside a bounded set, it follows that can be approximated by a function in .]
Claim 2: is a dense subset of , where denotes the collection of -measurable finite-valued simple functions on such that .
We have shown for a general that is a dense subset of for (Claim 2 above).
It is also the case that is a dense subset of . Therefore, is a dense subset of for . [This should pose no problem.]
What about the case where ? [Do Claims 1 and 2 in any way depend on whether or not ?]
Show that in Example 3.3.1 (c) is a basis for .
Let be infinitely differentiable and be zero outside a bounded interval.
Let be Borel measurable and for all bounded intervals in . Show that is well defined and infinitely differentiable.
Show that for any , there exist a sequence of such functions such that in .