Density / approximation argument

[48/42%]
Show
LaTeX

Suppose f∈L1(R)f \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb {R}).

?
(a)

For t∈Rt \in \mathbb {R}, define ft:R→Rf_{t}: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} by ft(x)=f(x−t)f_{t}(x) = f(x-t). Prove that

lim⁡t→0∥f−ft∥1=0 \lim _{t \rightarrow 0}\left\| f-f_{t}\right\| _{1} = 0
(b)

For t>0t > 0, define ft:R→Rf_{t}: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} by ft(x)=f(tx)f_{t}(x) = f(t x). Prove that

lim⁡t→1∥f−ft∥1=0 \lim _{t \rightarrow 1}\left\| f-f_{t}\right\| _{1} = 0

Suppose UU is a subspace of a normed vector space VV. Suppose also that WW is a Banach space and S:U→WS: U \rightarrow W is a bounded linear map.

?
(a)

Prove that there exists a unique continuous function T:U‾→WT: \overline{U} \rightarrow W such that T∣U=S\left.T\right|_{U} = S

(b)

Prove that the function TT in part (a) is a bounded linear map from U‾\overline{U} to WW and ∥T∥=∥S∥\left\| T\right\| = \left\| S\right\|.

(c)

Give an example to show that part (a) can fail if the assumption that WW is a Banach space is replaced by the assumption that WW is a normed vector space.

Suppose μ\mu is a measure, 0<p≤∞0 < p \leq \infty, and f∈Lp(μ)f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu ). Prove that for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a simple function g∈Lp(μ)g \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu ) such that ∥f−g∥p<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{p} < \varepsilon.

?
Remark.
?

This exercise extends 3.44.

Suppose 0<p<∞0 < p < \infty and f∈Lp(R)f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb {R}). Prove that for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a step function g∈Lp(R)g \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb {R}) such that ∥f−g∥p<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{p} < \varepsilon.

?
Remark.
?

This exercise extends 3.47.

Suppose 0<p<∞0 < p < \infty and f∈Lp(R)f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb {R}). Prove that for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a continuous function g:R→Fg: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbf{F} such that ∥f−g∥p<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{p} < \varepsilon and the set {x∈R:g(x)≠0}\left\{ x \in \mathbb {R}: g(x) \neq 0\right\} is bounded.

?
Remark.
?

This exercise extends 3.48.

Suppose 1≤p<∞1 \leq p < \infty and f∈Lp(R)f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb {R}).

?
(a)

For t∈Rt \in \mathbb {R}, define ft:R→Rf_{t}: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} by ft(x)=f(x−t)f_{t}(x) = f(x-t). Prove that the function t↦∥f−ft∥pt \mapsto \left\| f-f_{t}\right\|_{p} is bounded and uniformly continuous on R\mathbb {R}.

(b)

For t>0t > 0, define ft:R→Rf_{t}: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} by ft(x)=f(tx)f_{t}(x) = f(t x). Prove that

lim⁡t→1∥f−ft∥p=0 \lim _{t \rightarrow 1}\left\| f-f_{t}\right\| _{p} = 0

Let φ1,φ2,…,φn,…\varphi_{1}, \varphi_{2}, \ldots , \varphi_{n}, \ldots be nonnegative continuous functions on [0,1][0,1] such that the limit

lim⁡n→∞∫01xkφn(x) dx \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \int _{0}^{1} x^{k}\varphi _{n}(x)\, dx

exists for every k=0,1,…k = 0,1,\ldots. Show that the limit

lim⁡n→∞∫01f(x)φn(x) dx \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \int _{0}^{1} f(x)\varphi _{n}(x)\, dx

exists for every continuous function ff on [0,1][0,1].

?

Let ff and gg be continuous functions on R\mathbb {R} such that f(x+1)=f(x)f(x+1) = f(x), g(x+1)=g(x)g(x+1) = g(x), for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb {R}. Prove that

lim⁡n→∞∫01f(x)g(nx) dx=∫01f(x) dx∫01g(x) dx. \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \int _{0}^{1} f(x)g(nx)\, dx = \int _{0}^{1} f(x)\, dx \int _{0}^{1} g(x)\, dx.
?

Let ff be a continuous real valued function on [0,1][0,1], and let the function hh in the complex plane be defined by

h(z)=∫01f(t)cos⁡zt dt. h(z) = \int _{0}^{1} f(t)\cos zt \, dt.
?
(1)

Prove that hh is analytic in the entire plane.

(2)

Prove that hh is the zero function only if ff is the zero function.

Let FF be a continuous complex valued function on the interval [0,1][0,1]. Let

f(z)=∫01F(t)t−z dt, f(z) = \int _{0}^{1} \frac{F(t)}{t-z} \, dt,

for zz a complex number not in [0,1][0,1].

?
(1)

Prove that ff is an analytic function.

(2)

Express the coefficients of the Laurent series of ff about ∞\infty in terms of FF. Use the result to show that FF is uniquely determined by ff.

Let x∈L1([a,b])x \in L_{1}(\left[a, b\right]). Prove that lim⁡h→0+∫ab−h∣x(t+h)−x(t)∣dt=0\lim_{h \rightarrow 0+} \int_{a}^{b-h}\left|x(t+h)-x(t)\right| d t = 0.

?

Let f∈L∞(R)f \in L_{\infty }(\mathbb {R}), and there exists a>0a > 0 such that f=0f = 0 almost everywhere for ∣x∣≥a\left|x\right| \geq a. Prove that there exists a sequence {gn}⊂D(R)\left\{ g_{n}\right\} \subset \mathcal{D}(\mathbb {R}) such that ∥gn∥∞≤∥f∥∞,n≥1\left\| g_{n}\right\|_{\infty } \leq \left\| f\right\|_{\infty }, n \geq 1, and gn→f( mod m),n→∞g_{n} \rightarrow f(\bmod m), n \rightarrow \infty.

?

Let XX be an NLS, M⊂XM \subset X be a convex dense subset in XX and f∈X∗f \in X^{*}. Prove that the set M∩Ker⁡fM \cap \operatorname {Ker} f is dense in Ker⁡f\operatorname {Ker} f.

?

(Yamabe) Let XX be an NLS, M⊂XM \subset X be a convex dense subset in X,x∈X,ε>0,f1,…,fn∈X∗X, x \in X, \varepsilon > 0, f_{1}, \ldots , f_{n} \in X^{*}. Prove that ∃y∈M,∥x−y∥<ε:fi(y)=fi(x),1≤i≤n\exists y \in M,\left\| x-y\right\| < \varepsilon : f_{i}(y) = f_{i}(x), 1 \leq i \leq n.

?

Let XX be an NLS, YY be a Banach space, the linear set M⊂XM \subset X is dense in XX, and A∈L(M,Y)A \in \mathcal{L}(M, Y). Prove that the operator AA admits a unique extension Aˉ∈L(X,Y)\bar{A} \in \mathcal{L}(X, Y), and ∥Aˉ∥=∥A∥\left\| \bar{A}\right\| = \left\| A\right\|.

?

In Lp(R),1≤p<+∞L_{p}(\mathbb {R}), 1 \leq p < +\infty, define the shift operator

(Asx)(t)=x(t+s),t∈R,x∈Lp(R),s∈R \left(A_{s} x\right)(t) = x(t+s), t \in \mathbb {R}, x \in L_{p}(\mathbb {R}), s \in \mathbb {R}

Let sn→s,n→∞s_{n} \rightarrow s, n \rightarrow \infty, and sn≠s,n≥1s_{n} \neq s, n \geq 1. Prove that Asn→sAsA_{s_{n}} \xrightarrow {s} A_{s}, but Asn⇏AsA_{s_{n}} \nRightarrow A_{s}.

?

Let HH be a Hilbert space, {An:n≥1}⊂L(H),sup⁡n≥1∥An∥<+∞\left\{ A_{n}: n \geq 1\right\} \subset \mathcal{L}(H), \sup_{n \geq 1}\left\| A_{n}\right\| < +\infty, and ∃L⊂H,Lˉ=H,∀x,y∈L:∃lim⁡n→∞(Anx,y)\exists L \subset H, \bar{L} = H, \forall x, y \in L: \exists \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty }\left(A_{n} x, y\right).

Prove that there exists A∈L(H)A \in \mathcal{L}(H) such that An→wAA_{n} \xrightarrow {w} A.

?

Show that:

?
(a)

D\mathcal{D} is dense in E\mathcal{E};

(b)

D\mathcal{D} is dense in S\mathcal{S}.

Prove that D\mathcal{D} is dense in each of the spaces

?
(a)

Lp(R),1⩽p<∞L_{p}(\mathbb {R}), 1 \leqslant p < \infty;

(b)

Cn[a,b],n=0,1,…C^{n}[a, b], n = 0,1, \ldots

Prove that regular generalized functions are dense in D′\mathcal{D}^{\prime }.

?

Prove that regular generalized functions generated by compactly supported infinitely differentiable functions are dense in D′\mathcal{D}^{\prime } (that is, D\mathcal{D} is dense in D′\mathcal{D}^{\prime }).

?

Prove that for any generalized function F∈D′F \in \mathcal{D}^{\prime } there exists a sequence of regular functions, generated by functions from D\mathcal{D}, which converges to FF in D′\mathcal{D}^{\prime }. 1

Footnotes

  1. This statement is not equivalent to the statement of the previous problem! ↩

?

Let D={f∈L2(R):f is absolutely continuous on every bounded interval in R and f′∈L2(R)}\mathcal{D} = \left\{ f \in L^2(\mathbb {R}) : f \text{ is absolutely continuous on every bounded interval in } \mathbb {R} \text{ and } f' \in L^2(\mathbb {R})\right\}. (Recall that for ff in D\mathcal{D}, letting Af=if′Af = if' makes AA self-adjoint.)

Show that for every ff in D\mathcal{D} there is a sequence {fn}\left\{ f_n\right\} in Cc(1)(R)C_c^{(1)}(\mathbb {R}) such that fn→ff_n \to f and fn′→f′f_n' \to f' in L2(R)L^2(\mathbb {R}).

?

Recall Proposition 6.13: if ψ∈L1(R)\psi \in L^1(\mathbb {R}) is such that (2π)−1/2∫Rψ(x) dx=1(2\pi )^{-1/2}\int_{\mathbb {R}} \psi (x) \, dx = 1 and if for ε>0\varepsilon > 0, ψε(x)=ε−1ψ(x/ε)\psi_\varepsilon (x) = \varepsilon^{-1}\psi (x/\varepsilon ), then for every ff in C0(R)C_0(\mathbb {R}), ψε∗f(x)→f(x)\psi_\varepsilon * f(x) \to f(x) uniformly on R\mathbb {R}.

Let ψ\psi and ψε\psi_\varepsilon be as above. If f∈Lp(R)f \in L^p(\mathbb {R}), 1≤p<∞1 \leq p < \infty, show that ∥f∗ψε−f∥p→0\left\| f * \psi_\varepsilon - f\right\|_p \to 0 as ε→0\varepsilon \to 0. If f∈L∞(R)f \in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}), show that f∗ψε→ff * \psi_\varepsilon \to f (weak*).

?

Let {xn}\left\{ x_{n}\right\} be a sequence in a Hilbert space HH, and let EE be a dense subset of HH. Show that if there exist some A,B>0A, B > 0 such that A∥x∥2≤∑∣⟨x,xn⟩∣2≤B∥x∥2A\left\| x\right\|^{2} \leq \sum \left| \left\langle x, x_{n} \right\rangle \right|^{2} \leq B\left\| x\right\|^{2} for x∈Ex \in E, then {xn}\left\{ x_{n}\right\} is a frame for HH. Thus it suffices to establish the frame condition on some dense (and hopefully "nice") subset of HH (compare hypothesis (b) of Theorem 7.4).

?
?
(a)

Show that equations (9.3) and (9.4) hold for every f∈Cc2(R)f \in C_{c}^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

Use part (a), together with the fact that L1(R)∩L2(R)L^{1}(\mathbb {R}) \cap L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) is dense in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), to show that equations (9.3) and (9.4) hold for every f∈L2(R)f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), in the sense of pointwise almost everywhere equality of functions.

Show that {ψ∈L2(R):ψ is admissible}\left\{ \psi \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}): \psi \text{ is admissible}\right\} is dense in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?

The existence of infinitely differentiable, compactly supported functions is demonstrated in Exercise 11.9. Combine Exercises 13.13 and 13.15 with Theorem 13.13 to show that C∞(T)C^{\infty }(\mathbf{T}) is dense in Lp(T)L^{p}(\mathbf{T}) for 1≤p<∞1 \leq p < \infty, and is dense in C(T)C(\mathbf{T}) with respect to the uniform norm. Conclude that Cm(T)C^{m}(\mathbf{T}) is dense in these spaces for each integer m≥0m \geq 0.

?

Prove that D(Ω)\mathcal D(\Omega ) is dense in E(Ω)\mathcal E(\Omega ) for any domain Ω⊂Rn\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^{n}.

?

Find the orthogonal complements in L2((1,0))L^{2}\left({(1,0)}\right) of the following sets:

?
(a)

the polynomials in xx;

(b)

the polynomials in x2x^2;

(c)

the polynomials with zero free term;

(d)

the polynomials with sum of coefficients equal to zero.

Let f∈C([0,1])f \in C(\left[0,1\right]). Prove that

?
(a)

if ∫01f(x)xndx=0\int_{0}^{1} f(x) x^{n} d x=0 for n=0,1,2,…n=0,1,2, \ldots, then f≡0f \equiv 0;

(b)

if ∫01f(x)(xn+1(1−x)2)′′dx=0\int_{0}^{1} f(x)\left(x^{n+1}(1-x)^{2}\right)^{\prime \prime } d x=0 for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}, then ff is a linear function.

Let f∈C([0,1])f \in C(\left[0,1\right]) and ∫01f(x)g′′(x)dx=0\int_{0}^{1} f(x) g^{\prime \prime }(x) d x=0 for every function g∈C2([0,1])g \in C^{2}(\left[0,1\right]) vanishing in neighborhoods of the points 0 and 1. Prove that ff is a linear function.

?

Let ( X,M,μX, \mathfrak {M}, \mu ) be a measure space, let ff be a nonnegative function that is integrable over XX, and let ε>0\varepsilon >0. Prove that there exists a set A∈MA \in \mathfrak {M} such that μ(A)<∞\mu (A)<\infty and a simple function ss that vanishes outside of AA and satisfies 0≤s≤f0 \leq s \leq f and ∫X∣f−s∣dμ<ε\int_{X}|f-s| d \mu <\varepsilon.

?

Let X,YX, Y be Banach spaces, let T∈L(X,Y)T \in \mathcal{L}(X, Y), let {Tn}\left\{ T_{n}\right\} be a bounded sequence in L(X,Y)\mathcal{L}(X, Y), and suppose that lim⁡n∥Tnx−Tx∥=0\lim_{n}\left\| T_{n} x-T x\right\| =0 for all xx in a dense subset of XX. Prove or disprove: lim⁡n∥Tn−T∥=0\lim_{n}\left\| T_{n}-T\right\| =0.

?

Let f(x)f(x) denote a properly integrable function on [a,b]\left[a, b\right]. There exist to every positive number ε\varepsilon two step-functions, ψ(x)\psi (x) and Ψ(x)\Psi (x), such that for the entire interval [a,b]\left[a, b\right]

ψ(x)≤f(x)≤Ψ(x) \psi (x) \leq f(x) \leq \Psi (x)

and

∫abΨ(x) dx−∫abψ(x) dx<ε. \int _{a}^{b} \Psi (x) \, dx - \int _{a}^{b} \psi (x) \, dx < \varepsilon .

It is even possible to choose ψ(x)\psi (x) and Ψ(x)\Psi (x) so that their points of discontinuity are equidistant.

?

The limit relation in Problem 155 is also valid if f(x)f(x) denotes a properly integrable function on [0,c]\left[0, c\right].

?

Show that the subspace of simple functions is dense in L∞(E)L^{\infty }(E).

?

Let S\mathcal{S} be a dense subset of XX. Show that if Φ∈X∗\Phi \in X^{*}, then ∥Φ∥∗=sup⁡{Φ(f)∣f∈S,∥f∥≤1}\left\| \Phi \right\|_{*} = \sup \left\{ \Phi (f) \mid f \in \mathcal{S},\left\| f\right\| \leq 1\right\}.

?

With the notations of Exercise 11, suppose f∈R(α)f \in \mathscr {R}(\alpha ) and ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Prove that there exists a continuous function gg on [a,b][a, b] such that ∥f−g∥2<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{2} < \varepsilon.

Hint: Let P={x0,…,xn}P = \left\{ x_{0}, \ldots , x_{n}\right\} be a suitable partition of [a,b][a, b], define

g(t)=xi−tΔxif(xi−1)+t−xi−1Δxif(xi) g(t) = \frac{x_{i}-t}{\Delta x_{i}} f\left(x_{i-1}\right)+\frac{t-x_{i-1}}{\Delta x_{i}} f\left(x_{i}\right)

if xi−1≤t≤xix_{i-1} \leq t \leq x_{i}.

?

Assume f∈R(α)f \in \mathscr {R}(\alpha ) on [a,b][a, b], and prove that there are polynomials PnP_{n} such that

lim⁡n→∞∫ab∣f−Pn∣2dα=0 \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \int _{a}^{b}\left|f-P_{n}\right|^{2} d \alpha = 0

(Compare with Exercise 12, Chap. 6).

?

A step function is, by definition, a finite linear combination of characteristic functions of bounded intervals in R1\mathbb {R}^{1}. Assume f∈L1(R1)f \in L^{1}\left(\mathbb {R}^{1}\right), and prove that there is a sequence {gn}\left\{ g_{n}\right\} of step functions so that

lim⁡n→∞∫−∞∞∣f(x)−gn(x)∣dx=0 \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|f(x)-g_{n}(x)\right| d x = 0
?

Suppose {Λn}\left\{ \Lambda_{n}\right\} is a sequence of bounded linear transformations from a normed linear space XX to a Banach space YY, suppose ∥Λn∥≤M<∞\left\| \Lambda_{n}\right\| \leq M < \infty for all nn, and suppose there is a dense set E⊂XE \subset X such that {Λnx}\left\{ \Lambda_{n} x\right\} converges for each x∈Ex \in E. Prove that {Λnx}\left\{ \Lambda_{n} x\right\} converges for each x∈Xx \in X.

?

Let f:R→R‾f: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \overline{\mathbb {R}} be such that ∫Rf dλˉ\int_{\mathbb {R}} f \, d\bar{\lambda } exists, is finite. Further suppose that ∫(a,b)f dλˉ=0\int_{(a,b)} f \, d\bar{\lambda }=0 for every −∞<a<b<+∞-\infty <a<b<+\infty. Then f=0f=0 λˉ\bar{\lambda }-a.e. on R\mathbb {R}. [Work from indicators to simple functions, then to nonnegative functions, then to general integrable functions.]

?

Here we will show that the collection CcC_{c} of continuous functions with compact support is dense in L1L^{1}, where the notion of distance is as given in the previous exercise. That is, given f∈L1f \in L^{1} and ε>0\varepsilon >0, there is g∈Ccg \in C_{c} such that ∥f−g∥1<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{1}<\varepsilon. Work in the following stages.

?
(a)

f=  1Af=\; \mathbb {1}_{A}, where AA is a bounded Lebesgue subset of Rk\mathbb {R}^{k}. [Find compact KK and bounded open GG with K⊆A⊆GK \subseteq A \subseteq G and λˉk(G−K)<ε\bar{\lambda }_{k}(G-K)<\varepsilon; use the approximation theorem in Section 4.2. Use Urysohn's Lemma in Section 5.7 to find gg on Rk\mathbb {R}^{k} that is continuous with 0⩽g⩽10 \leqslant g \leqslant 1, g=1g=1 on KK, and g=0g=0 on GcG^{c}. Argue that g−  1A=0g-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}=0 for all x∈K∪Gc\boldsymbol {x} \in K \cup G^{c} and ∣g−  1A∣⩽1\left|g-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}\right| \leqslant 1 on G−KG-K. Show that this gives ∥g−  1A∥1<ε\left\| g-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}\right\|_{1}<\varepsilon.]

(b)

ff is a nonnegative finite-valued Lebesgue measurable simple function that is zero outside a bounded set, say f=∑i=1nci  1Aif=\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{i} \; \mathbb {1}_{A_{i}}, where 0⩽c1,…,cn<+∞0 \leqslant c_{1}, \ldots , c_{n}<+\infty and A1,…,AnA_{1}, \ldots , A_{n} are disjoint bounded Lk\mathcal{L}^{k}-sets. [This follows from (a); approximate each   1Ai\; \mathbb {1}_{A_{i}} by some gi∈Ccg_{i} \in C_{c}. Show that ∑i=1ncigi∈Cc\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{i} g_{i} \in C_{c} approximates ∑i=1nci  1Ai\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{i} \; \mathbb {1}_{A_{i}}.]

(c)

ff is a nonnegative measurable function that is zero outside a bounded set. [Find a nonnegative finite-valued nondecreasing sequence {sn}n=1∞\left\{ s_{n}\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty } of Lebesgue measurable simple functions as in (b) that are zero outside of some bounded set with sn→fs_{n} \rightarrow f. Show that lim⁡n∥sn−f∥1=0\lim_{n} \left\| s_{n}-f\right\|_{1}=0 by using DCT. Therefore, ff may be approximated by the types of functions given in (b).]

(d)

ff is a measurable function that is zero outside a bounded set. [Write ff as f+−f−f^{+}-f^{-}; use (c). This part shows that ff may be approximated by functions as given in (c).]

(e)

ff a completely general element of L1L^{1}. [Use DCT to show the limit relation lim⁡n∥f  1B(0,n)−f∥1=0\lim_{n} \left\| f \; \mathbb {1}_{B(\boldsymbol {0}, n)}-f\right\|_{1}=0. Thus ff may be approximated by functions of the type given in (d). Here B(0,n)B(\boldsymbol {0}, n) is the open ball centered at the origin with radius nn.]

(f)

Work backward from (e) to (a) to prove the claim given at the beginning of this problem.

Remark.
?

Approximation theorem for Lebesgue measure (Section 4.2), the part needed here: given A∈LkA \in \mathcal{L}^{k} and ε>0\varepsilon >0, there exist a closed set CC and open set G1G_{1} with C⊆A⊆G1C \subseteq A \subseteq G_{1} and λk(G1−C)<ε/2\lambda_{k}\left(G_{1}-C\right)<\varepsilon /2; combined with the analogous statement for AcA^{c}, this yields compact KK and bounded open GG with K⊆A⊆GK \subseteq A \subseteq G and λk(G−K)<ε\lambda_{k}(G-K)<\varepsilon whenever AA is itself bounded. Urysohn's Lemma (Section 5.7): let ∅⊊F⊆G⊆Rk\varnothing \subsetneq F \subseteq G \subseteq \mathbb {R}^{k}, where FF is closed and GG is open. Then there exists a continuous function ϕ:Rk→R\phi : \mathbb {R}^{k} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} such that (i) 0⩽ϕ(x)⩽10 \leqslant \phi (\boldsymbol {x}) \leqslant 1 for each x∈Rk\boldsymbol {x} \in \mathbb {R}^{k}, (ii) ϕ(x)=1\phi (\boldsymbol {x})=1 for each x∈F\boldsymbol {x} \in F, (iii) ϕ(x)=0\phi (\boldsymbol {x})=0 for each x∈Gc\boldsymbol {x} \in G^{c}, and (iv) 0<ϕ(x)<10<\phi (\boldsymbol {x})<1 for each x∈G−F\boldsymbol {x} \in G-F. The support of a function ff is the set supp⁡(f)={ω∈Rk:f(ω)≠0}‾\operatorname {supp}(f)=\overline{\left\{ \boldsymbol {\omega } \in \mathbb {R}^{k}: f(\boldsymbol {\omega }) \neq 0\right\} }; if this closed set is bounded, and hence compact, we say that ff has compact support.

The following is an outline of an alternative proof that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is a dense subset of Lp(Rk,Bk,λk)L^{p}\left(\mathbb {R}^{k}, \mathscr {B}^{k}, \lambda_{k}\right) (where 1⩽p<+∞1 \leqslant p<+\infty) that doesn't use Lusin's Theorem [as was used in Claim 3]. Here Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} denotes the collection of real-valued functions on Rk\mathbb {R}^{k} that are continuous and have compact support, and S0\mathfrak {S}_{0} denotes the collection of F/B∗\mathcal{F}/\mathfrak {B}^{*}-measurable finite-valued simple functions ss on Ω\Omega such that μ({ω∈Ω:s(ω)≠0})<∞\mu \left(\left\{ \omega \in \Omega : s(\omega ) \neq 0\right\} \right)<\infty.

Claim 3: Given any bounded f∈Lp(Rk,Bk,λk)f \in L^{p}\left(\mathbb {R}^{k}, \mathscr {B}^{k}, \lambda_{k}\right) and ε>0\varepsilon >0, we can find g∈Ccg \in \mathfrak {C}_{c} such that ∥f−g∥p<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{p}<\varepsilon and sup⁡ω∈Rk∣g(ω)∣⩽sup⁡ω∈Rk∣f(ω)∣\sup_{\omega \in \mathbb {R}^{k}}\left|g(\omega )\right| \leqslant \sup_{\omega \in \mathbb {R}^{k}}\left|f(\omega )\right|. In particular, Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is a dense subset of Lp(Rk,Bk,λk)L^{p}\left(\mathbb {R}^{k}, \mathscr {B}^{k}, \lambda_{k}\right).

?
(a)

Show that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in {  1A:A∈Bk is bounded}\left\{ \; \mathbb {1}_{A}: A \in \mathscr {B}^{k} \text{ is bounded}\right\}. [Let A∈BkA \in \mathscr {B}^{k} be bounded. Find compact KK and open GG with K⊆A⊆GK \subseteq A \subseteq G and λk(G−K)<εp\lambda_{k}(G-K)<\varepsilon^{p}. Use Urysohn's Lemma to find a g:Rk→Rg: \mathbb {R}^{k} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} that is continuous with 0⩽g⩽10 \leqslant g \leqslant 1, g=1g=1 on KK, and g=0g=0 on GcG^{c}. We have g∈Ccg \in \mathfrak {C}_{c} and g(x)−  1A(x)=0g(\boldsymbol {x})-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}(\boldsymbol {x})=0 for every x∈K∪Gc\boldsymbol {x} \in K \cup G^{c}. Then

∥g−  1A∥p=(∫∣g−  1A∣p)1/p=(∫G−K∣g−  1A∣p)1/p⩽(∫G−K1)1/p<ε. \left\| g-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}\right\| _{p}=\left(\int \left|g-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}\right|^{p}\right)^{1 / p}=\left(\int _{G-K}\left|g-\; \mathbb {1}_{A}\right|^{p}\right)^{1 / p} \leqslant \left(\int _{G-K} 1\right)^{1 / p}<\varepsilon .

]

(b)

Show that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in the collection of nonnegative finite-valued F/B∗\mathcal{F}/\mathfrak {B}^{*}-measurable simple functions ∑i=1nci  1Ai\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{i} \; \mathbb {1}_{A_{i}} on Ω\Omega such that each AiA_{i} is bounded if ci>0c_{i}>0. [Without loss of generality, assume that each ci>0c_{i}>0, so that A1,…,AnA_{1}, \ldots , A_{n} are bounded. For each i∈{1,…,n}i \in \left\{ 1, \ldots , n\right\}, find gi∈Ccg_{i} \in \mathfrak {C}_{c} such that ∥gi−  1Ai∥p<ε1+∑i=1n∣ci∣\left\| g_{i}-\; \mathbb {1}_{A_{i}}\right\|_{p}<\frac{\varepsilon }{1+\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left|c_{i}\right|}; this requires the result of (a). Let g=∑i=1ncigig=\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{i} g_{i}. Then g∈Ccg \in \mathfrak {C}_{c} and it is easy to show that ∥g−∑i=1nci  1Ai∥p<ε\left\| g-\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_{i} \; \mathbb {1}_{A_{i}}\right\|_{p}<\varepsilon.]

(c)

Show that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in the class of nonnegative functions in LpL^{p} that are zero outside a bounded set. [Show that the functions in (b) are dense in the collection here in (c) as follows: let f⩾0f \geqslant 0 be in LpL^{p} with f=0f=0 outside some bounded A∈BkA \in \mathscr {B}^{k}. Find a nondecreasing sequence {sn}n=1∞\left\{ s_{n}\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty } of functions in (b) with sn→fs_{n} \rightarrow f. Use DCT to show that lim⁡n∥sn−f∥p=0\lim_{n}\left\| s_{n}-f\right\|_{p}=0 by using the fact that ∣f−sn∣p⩽fp∈L1\left|f-s_{n}\right|^{p} \leqslant f^{p} \in L^{1}. Since Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in the collection of functions in (b), and since the collection of functions in (b) has been shown by this outline here in (c) to be dense in the collection of functions given here in (c), the claim of (c) follows.]

(d)

Show that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in the class of functions in LpL^{p} that are zero outside a bounded set. [Let f∈Lpf \in L^{p} be zero outside a bounded set, and pick ε>0\varepsilon >0. Write f=f+−f−f=f^{+}-f^{-}. Both f+f^{+}and f−f^{-}are nonnegative functions in LpL^{p} that are zero outside a bounded set. By (c), there are functions g1,g2∈Ccg_{1}, g_{2} \in \mathfrak {C}_{c} with ∥f+−g1∥p\left\| f^{+}-g_{1}\right\|_{p} and ∥f−−g2∥p\left\| f^{-}-g_{2}\right\|_{p} both less than ε2\frac{\varepsilon }{2}. Let g=g1−g2g=g_{1}-g_{2}. Then g∈Ccg \in \mathfrak {C}_{c} and ∥f−g∥p<ε\left\| f-g\right\|_{p}<\varepsilon.]

(e)

Show that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in LpL^{p}. [Let f∈Lpf \in L^{p}. Since ∣f  1B(0,n)−f∣p⩽∣f∣p∈L1\left|f \; \mathbb {1}_{B(\mathbf{0}, n)}-f\right|^{p} \leqslant \left|f\right|^{p} \in L^{1}, DCT gives lim⁡n∥f  1B(0,n)−f∥p=0\lim_{n}\left\| f \; \mathbb {1}_{B(\mathbf{0}, n)}-f\right\|_{p}=0. Thus ff can be approximated by a function in LpL^{p} that vanishes outside a bounded set. Since (d) says that Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c} is dense in the class of functions in LpL^{p} that vanish outside a bounded set, it follows that ff can be approximated by a function in Cc\mathfrak {C}_{c}.]

Claim 2: S0\mathfrak {S}_{0} is a dense subset of LpL^{p}, where S0\mathfrak {S}_{0} denotes the collection of F/B∗\mathcal{F}/\mathfrak {B}^{*}-measurable finite-valued simple functions ss on Ω\Omega such that μ({ω∈Ω:s(ω)≠0})<∞\mu \left(\left\{ \omega \in \Omega : s(\omega ) \neq 0\right\} \right)<\infty.

We have shown for a general (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \mu ) that S0\mathfrak {S}_{0} is a dense subset of LpL^{p} for 1⩽p<+∞1 \leqslant p<+\infty (Claim 2 above).

?
(a)

It is also the case that S0\mathfrak {S}_{0} is a dense subset of L∞L^{\infty }. Therefore, S0\mathfrak {S}_{0} is a dense subset of LpL^{p} for 1⩽p⩽+∞1 \leqslant p \leqslant +\infty. [This should pose no problem.]

(b)

What about the case where 0<p<10<p<1? [Do Claims 1 and 2 in any way depend on whether or not p⩾1p \geqslant 1?]

Show that BB in Example 3.3.1 (c) is a basis for HH.

?

Let g:R→Rg: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be infinitely differentiable and be zero outside a bounded interval.

?
(a)

Let f:R→Rf: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be Borel measurable and ∫A∣f∣dm<∞\int_{A}\left|f\right| d m < \infty for all bounded intervals AA in R\mathbb {R}. Show that f∗gf * g is well defined and infinitely differentiable.

(b)

Show that for any f∈L1(R)f \in L^{1}(\mathbb {R}), there exist a sequence {gn}n≥1\left\{ g_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} of such functions such that f∗gn→ff * g_{n} \rightarrow f in L1(R)L^{1}(\mathbb {R}).

References

[Axl19] Axler S. Measure, Integration & Real Analysis. 3rd ed., Springer, 2019.
[deSi04] de Souza P.N., Silva J. Berkeley Problems in Mathematics. 3rd ed., Springer, 2004.
[BCK+24] Brayman V.B., Chaikovskyi A.V., Konstantinov O.Y., Kukush A.G., Mishura Y.S., Nesterenko O.N. Functional Analysis and Operator Theory. Springer, 2024.
[БСШ17] Бородин П.А., Савчук А.М., Шейпак И.А. Задачи по функциональному анализу. МЦНМО, 2017.
[Con07] Conway J.B. A Course in Functional Analysis. 2nd ed., Springer, 2007.
[Hei11] Heil C. A Basis Theory Primer. Birkhäuser, 2011.
[KiGv88] Kirillov A.A., Gvishiani A.D. Теоремы и задачи функционального анализа. 2-е изд., Наука, 1988.
[МГЛ+04] Макаров Б.М., Голузина М.Г., Лодкин А.А., Подкорытов А.Н. Избранные задачи по вещественному анализу. 2-е изд., Невский Диалект; БХВ-Петербург, 2004.
[Pet25] Petrovic J.S. Measure and Integral: Theory and Practice. CRC Press, 2025.
[PóSz98] Pólya G., Szegő G. Problems and Theorems in Analysis. Springer, 1998.
[RoFi23] Royden H.L., Fitzpatrick P.M. Real Analysis. 5th ed., Pearson, 2023.
[Rud76] Rudin W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1976.
[Rud87] Rudin W. Real and Complex Analysis. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1987.
[Ves03] Vestrup E.M. The Theory of Measures and Integration. Wiley-Interscience, 2003.
[AtLa06] Athreya K.B., Lahiri S.N. Measure Theory and Probability Theory. Springer, 2006.