Examples of Banach Space Techniques
[22/9%]Let consist of two points and , put , and let be the resulting real -space. Identify each real function on with the point in the plane, and sketch the unit balls of , for . Note that they are convex if and only if . For which is this unit ball a square? A circle? If , how does the situation differ from the preceding one?
Prove that the unit ball (open or closed) is convex in every normed linear space.
If , prove that the unit ball of is strictly convex; this means that if
then . (Geometrically, the surface of the ball contains no straight lines). Show that this fails in every , in every , and in every . (Ignore trivialities, such as spaces consisting of only one point).
Let be the space of all continuous functions on [0,1], with the supremum norm. Let consist of all for which
Prove that is a closed convex subset of which contains no element of minimal norm.
Let be the set of all , relative to Lebesgue measure, such that
Show that is a closed convex subset of which contains infinitely many elements of minimal norm. (Compare this and Exercise 4 with Theorem 4.10).
Let be a bounded linear functional on a subspace of a Hilbert space . Prove that has a unique norm-preserving extension to a bounded linear functional on , and that this extension vanishes on .
Construct a bounded linear functional on some subspace of some which has two (hence infinitely many) distinct norm-preserving linear extensions to .
Let be a normed linear space, and let be its dual space, as defined in Sec. 5.21, with the norm
Prove that is a Banach space.
Prove that the mapping is, for each , a bounded linear functional on , of norm . (This gives a natural imbedding of in its " second dual " , the dual space of ).
Prove that is bounded if is a sequence in such that is bounded for every .
Let , and be the Banach spaces consisting of all complex sequences , , defined as follows:
is the subspace of consisting of all for which as . Prove the following four statements.
If and for every , then is a bounded linear functional on , and . Moreover, every is obtained in this way. In brief, . (More precisely, these two spaces are not equal; the preceding statement exhibits an isometric vector space isomorphism between them).
In the same sense, .
Every induces a bounded linear functional on , as in (a). However, this does not give all of , since contains nontrivial functionals that vanish on all of .
and are separable but is not.
If converges for every sequence such that as , prove that .
For , let Lip denote the space of all complex functions on for which
Prove that Lip is a Banach space, if ; also, if
(The members of Lip are said to satisfy a Lipschitz condition of order ).
Let be a triangle (two-dimensional figure) in the plane, let be the set consisting of the vertices of , and let be the set of all real functions on , of the form
Show that to each there corresponds a unique measure on such that
(Compare Sec. 5.22). Replace by a square, let again be the set of its vertices, and let be as above. Show that to each point of there still corresponds a measure on , with the above property, but that uniqueness is now lost.
Can you extrapolate to a more general theorem? (Think of other figures, higher dimensional spaces).
Let be a sequence of continuous complex functions on a (nonempty) complete metric space , such that exists (as a complex number) for every .
Prove that there is an open set and a number such that for all and for
If , prove that there is an open set and an integer such that if and .
Hint for : For , put
Since , some has a nonempty interior.
Let be the space of all real continuous functions on with the supremum norm. Let be the subset of consisting of those for which there exists a such that for all . Fix and prove that each open set in contains an open set which does not intersect . (Each can be uniformly approximated by a zigzag function with very large slopes, and if is small, ). Show that this implies the existence of a dense in which consists entirely of nowhere differentiable functions.
Let be an infinite matrix with complex entries, where associates with each sequence a sequence , defined by
provided that these series converge. Prove that transforms every convergent sequence to a sequence which converges to the same limit if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:
for each .
.
. The process of passing from to is called a summability method. Two examples are:
and
Prove that each of these also transforms some divergent sequences (even some unbounded ones) to convergent sequences .
Suppose and are Banach spaces, and suppose is a linear mapping of into , with the following property: For every sequence in for which and exist, it is true that . Prove that is continuous.
This is the so-called "closed graph theorem". Hint: Let be the set of all ordered pairs and , with addition and scalar multiplication defined componentwise. Prove that is a Banach space, if . The graph of is the subset of formed by the pairs . Note that our hypothesis says that is closed; hence is a Banach space. Note that is continuous, one-to-one, and linear and maps onto .
Observe that there exist nonlinear mappings (of onto , for instance) whose graph is closed although they are not continuous: if .
If is a positive measure, each defines a multiplication operator on into , such that . Prove that . For which measures is it true that for all ? For which does map onto ?
Suppose is a sequence of bounded linear transformations from a normed linear space to a Banach space , suppose for all , and suppose there is a dense set such that converges for each . Prove that converges for each .
If is the th partial sum of the Fourier series of a function , prove that uniformly, as , for each . That is, prove that
On the other hand, if , prove that there exists an such that the sequence is unbounded. Hint: Apply the reasoning of Exercise 18 and that of Sec. 5.11, with a better estimate of than was used there.
Does there exist a sequence of continuous positive functions on such that is unbounded if and only if is rational?
Replace "rational" by "irrational" in (a) and answer the resulting question.
Replace " is unbounded" by " as " and answer the resulting analogues of and .
Suppose is measurable, and . Must there be a translate of that does not intersect ? Must there be a homeomorphism of onto so that does not intersect ?
Suppose and for some . (See Exercise 11). Prove that the Fourier series of converges to , by completing the following outline: It is enough to consider the case , . The difference between the partial sums and the integrals
tends to 0 as . The function is in . Apply the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma. More careful reasoning shows that the convergence is actually uniform on .