Coupling argument
[19/68%]Let be monotone nondecreasing. Show that for any random variable
provided all the expectations exist.
Let be the renewal function of an ordinary renewal process whose interarrival times have finite mean.
Show that the mean number of renewals in the interval is no larger than .
Show that there exists such that for .
Suppose the interarrival times are non-arithmetic with finite variance and mean . Show that
[Hint: Use coupling and Blackwell's renewal theorem (10.2.5).]
Let . Bertha and Harold play a game of rackets. Bertha wins the point with probability when she serves, and Harold wins with probability when he serves. The first player to win points wins the game, and Bertha serves first. Consider the following rules for changing server.
Service alternates between players.
Service is retained until a point is lost, and then passes to the other player.
Service is retained until a point is won, and then passes to the other player.
Bertha serves the first points, and then Harold serves any further points required to decide the outcome.
Show that is the same for all four rules.
Show that is stochastically larger than if and only if for any nondecreasing function for which the expectations exist.
Let and be Poisson distributed with respective parameters and . Show that is stochastically larger than if .
Show for discrete random variables that , where denotes total variation distance.
Show that equality is possible in the inequality of Exercise (4.12.4) in the following sense. For any pair of discrete random variables, there exists a pair , having the same marginal distributions as such that .
Let and be indicator variables with . What is the maximum possible value of , as a function of ? Explain how need to be distributed in order that be:
maximized,
minimized.
Let be a positive mass function on the finite set , and let be the transition matrix of an irreducible, aperiodic Markov chain with stationary distribution . Let be a vector of random variables such that for , and use as an update rule in the coupling-from-the-past algorithm for sampling from .
If the , are independent, show that the coalescence time is a.s. finite.
Give two examples of situations in which the coalescence time is a.s. infinite.
Show that for each pair of states of an irreducible aperiodic chain, there exists such that for all .
Let and be independent irreducible aperiodic chains with the same state space and transition matrix . Show that the bivariate chain , is irreducible and aperiodic.
Show that the bivariate chain may be reducible if and are periodic.
Let and be independent recurrent birth-death processes with the same parameters (and no explosions). It is not assumed that . Show that:
for any as ,
if , then for any increasing function .
For nonnegative random variables , show that is no greater than , with the quantile function for .
In the notation of Example , show that , for every convex, increasing function on .
Example 32: For a random variable with distribution function , define its quantile function for . Regarded as a random variable on , equipped with its Borel sigma-field and Lebesgue measure , the function has the same distribution as . Similarly, if has distribution function and quantile function , the random variable has the same distribution as . Both and are defined on the same , even though and need not be defined on the same space, giving a coupling of and .
Let and be two probability measures defined on the same sigma-field of a set . The total variation distance is defined as .
Suppose are are random elements of , defined on the same probability space , with distributions and . Show that . Hint: Choose a measurable set with . Note that .
Suppose the diagonal is product measurable. Recall from Section 3.3 that . Define a probability measure , where is the image of under the map . Let and be the coordinate maps. Show that has distribution and has distribution , and .
Prove Lemma by carrying out on the following steps. Write for . Argue by induction on the size of .
Lemma 9: Let be a finite measure on a finite set and be a finite measure on a sigma-field on a set . Suppose is a collection of measurable sets with the domination property that for all . Then there exists a probability kernel from to with concentrated on for each and . With no loss of generality, suppose . Check the case . Work from the inductive hypothesis that the result is true for S .
Suppose there exists a proper subset of for which . Define for . Show that for all . Construct by invoking the inductive hypothesis separately for and . (Compare with part (iv) of Problem [5].) Now suppose for all proper subsets of . Write for the probability distribution , which concentrates on .
Show that . Hint: Show for all .
Write for the unit mass at 1. Let be the largest value in for which for every .
If , use the inductive hypothesis to find a probability kernel from into for which . Define .
If , show that there exists an for which when . Deduce that must be a proper subset of for which . Invoke part (i) to find a probability kernel for which . Define .
(Continuation) Let and be two distribution functions, with for all . Prove that there exists a probability space and two random variables and , defined on this probability space, such that and .
Let and be random variables with distribution functions and respectively. Prove that
Let and be random variables with distribution functions and respectively. Prove that if
for some positive , then
Let and be random variables with probability distributions and respectively. Prove that