Representations and couplings
[8/0%]Suppose and , for are distribution functions on the real line for which for each in a dense subset of the real line. Show that the corresponding quantile functions converge pointwise to at all except (at worst) a countable subset of points in (0,1).
Let and be two probability measures defined on the same sigma-field of a set . The total variation distance is defined as .
Suppose are are random elements of , defined on the same probability space , with distributions and . Show that . Hint: Choose a measurable set with . Note that .
Suppose the diagonal is product measurable. Recall from Section 3.3 that . Define a probability measure , where is the image of under the map . Let and be the coordinate maps. Show that has distribution and has distribution , and .
Show that the Prohorov distance is a metric.
Let be a Borel probability measure concentrated on the closure of a countable subset of a metric space . For fixed , follow these steps to show that there exist a partition of into finitely many -continuity sets such that and diameter for .
For each in , show that there are at most countably many closed balls centered at with .
For each in , find a ball centered at with radius between and and .
Show that contains the closure of . Hint: Each point of the closure lies within of at least one .
Show that when is large enough.
Show that the sets and have the desired properties.
(Ye Olde Marriage Lemma) Suppose is a finite set of princesses. Suppose each princess, , has a list, , of frogs desirable for marriage. For each collection , the combined list of frogs equals . If each princess is to find a frog on her list to marry, then clearly the "Desirable Frog Condition" (DFC), K , for each , must be satisfied. Show that DFC is also sufficient for happy princesses: under the DFC there exists a one-to-one map from into such that for every in .
Prove Lemma by carrying out on the following steps. Write for . Argue by induction on the size of .
Lemma 9: Let be a finite measure on a finite set and be a finite measure on a sigma-field on a set . Suppose is a collection of measurable sets with the domination property that for all . Then there exists a probability kernel from to with concentrated on for each and . With no loss of generality, suppose . Check the case . Work from the inductive hypothesis that the result is true for S .
Suppose there exists a proper subset of for which . Define for . Show that for all . Construct by invoking the inductive hypothesis separately for and . (Compare with part (iv) of Problem [5].) Now suppose for all proper subsets of . Write for the probability distribution , which concentrates on .
Show that . Hint: Show for all .
Write for the unit mass at 1. Let be the largest value in for which for every .
If , use the inductive hypothesis to find a probability kernel from into for which . Define .
If , show that there exists an for which when . Deduce that must be a proper subset of for which . Invoke part (i) to find a probability kernel for which . Define .
Establish the bound , for , as needed (with for the proof of Lemma .
Let and be empirical distribution functions, constructed from independent samples (of sizes and ) from the same distribution function on the real line. Show that