Generalized least squares
[28/57%]Find the GLS estimate and the variance of its components in the case where the error covariance matrix is diagonal.
Obtain a matrix of the form (11.12).
Let , where the error vector has expectation , and ,
the numbers and are unknown, . Show that the GLS estimate of the vector has the form
where . Find values of for which the regression line lies entirely below all the observed values, and values for which it lies entirely above them.
Let , where , and and are independent. For two vectors find the GLS estimate and its variance for the two vectors .
Let the regression model have the form
where are independent centered random variables with variances . From the observations given in Table 11.5, find the realizations of the OLS estimate and the GLS estimate of the unknown parameters . For each estimate, compute the covariance matrix of its error.
Table 11.5
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Show that applying GLS to the simple linear regression model with error variances equal to is equivalent to applying ordinary least squares to the observation model of the form
where are independent random variables with variances for .
Consider the regression model
where the errors satisfy the first-order autoregression equation
where is a sequence of independent normally distributed random variables with zero mean and variance . Find the realization of the GLS estimate of the vector of unknown parameters from the observations given in Table 11.6.
Table 11.6
| 5,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 6,8 | 9,0 | 3,8 | 6,5 | 9,0 | 1,0 | 3,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,0 | 4,8 | 3,1 | 8,2 | 8,6 | 5,5 | 6,5 | 11,1 | 2,1 | 4,5 |
Compare the obtained vector with the realization of the OLS estimate constructed under the assumption that the errors are uncorrelated.
Consider the model relating the number of vacancies and the unemployment rate
where . Using the data from Table 11.7, find the OLS estimates of the parameters and . Use the Durbin-Watson test to test the hypothesis that the observation errors are uncorrelated, at the significance level . If the hypothesis is rejected, assume that the sequence of random errors satisfies the first-order autoregression equation
where are centered Gaussian random variables with variance . Find an estimate of the unknown coefficient in the autoregression equation.
Investigate the consumption function of Japan over the period 1951-1962 for correlation of the observation errors. If the observation errors are correlated, find the realization of the GLS estimate of the vector of unknown parameters. Find an estimate of the covariance matrix of the error vector . The data for the computations are given in Table 11.8 (data taken from: U. N. Yearbook of National Accounts Statistics, 1963). Here is aggregate individual consumption (trillion yen), and is aggregate personal income (trillion yen).
Table 11.8
| 1 | 2,86 | 3,52 | 7 | 5,89 | 7,00 |
| 2 | 3,51 | 4,26 | 8 | 6,20 | 7,32 |
| 3 | 4,22 | 4,77 | 9 | 6,70 | 8,24 |
| 4 | 4,67 | 5,25 | 10 | 7,51 | 9,46 |
| 5 | 4,97 | 5,73 | 11 | 8,58 | 11,10 |
| 6 | 5,43 | 6,35 | 12 | 9,96 | 12,69 |
Investigate the dependence between manufacturing value added () and gross domestic product () on a sample of 28 countries for 1994 that includes both small and large countries (UNIDO Yearbook 1997). Table 12.5 gives the values of and in millions of US dollars, the population in millions of people, and the data in the last two columns in US dollars per person. Construct the OLS estimate of the parameters and for the model
Check for heteroscedasticity using one of the tests, assuming that the observation errors are uncorrelated and Gaussian. If heteroscedasticity is detected, eliminate it by dividing each observation by the population value. For this, the data from the last two columns of Table 12.5 can be used.
Table 12.5
The weighing of three loads with masses and is carried out as follows: the first load is weighed times (all measurement errors have distribution , the second load is weighed times on the same scale, then the first and second loads together are weighed times on a different scale, whose measurement errors all have distribution . Reduce the problem to a linear model and find the least-squares estimators for and , as well as the optimal estimator for .
Let the vector have distribution , where is a known vector of dimension , is a known positive-definite matrix, and and are unknown parameters. Reduce the problem to a linear Gaussian model and find the least-squares estimators of the parameters and .
Let be independent random variables, where are unknown parameters. Reduce the problem to a linear model and construct an -test of size for testing the hypothesis .
Let , where , and and are statistically independent. If and , obtain the weighted least squares estimate of and find the variance of your estimate.
Let be independent random variables with a common mean and variances . Find the linear unbiased estimate of with minimum variance, and find this minimum variance.
Let be independent random variables, and let have a distribution for . Find the weighted least squares estimate of and prove that its variance is .
Let be random variables with common mean and with dispersion matrix , where and (). Find the generalized least squares estimate of and show that it is the same as the ordinary least squares estimate. Hint: takes the same form as .
Let , where is of and is a known positive-definite matrix. If is the generalized least squares estimate of , prove that
.
is the quadratic nonnegative unbiased estimate of with minimum variance.
If , then is idempotent but not, in general, symmetric.
Suppose that , and , where is a matrix of and is a known positive-definite matrix. Let be the generalized least squares estimate of ; that is, minimizes subject to . Show that
where is the generalized least squares estimate of for the model .
Let be independent random variables such that for ,
and
If the conditional distribution of given is the Type III (scaled gamma) distribution,
where a function of , and , prove that the maximum likeithood estimate of is also the weighted least squares estimate.
If the conditional distribution of given is Poisson, and , show that the maximum likelihood estimate is just the weighted least squares estimate.
Given the regression line
where the are independent with and , show that weighted least squares estimation is equivalent to ordinary least squares estimation for the model
If the first column of is and
use (9.8) to show that
Hint: Consider .
When , the appropriate estimate of is the generalized least squares estimate . If , show that and are identical. Hint: , where is nonsingular.
An experimenter wishes to estimate the density of a liquid by weighing known volumes of the liquid. Let be the weight for volume and let and . Find the least squares estimate of for the following cases:
.
.
.
Let , where with
and , and . Show that the generalized least squares estimates of and are
where . Also prove the following:
If , then the fitted regression cannot lie wholly above or below the values of (i.e., the cannot all have the same sign).
If , then the fitted regression line can lie wholly above or below the observations.
If is not of full rank, show that any solution of minimizes .
Let , where and the are independently distributed as . If is the ordinary least squares estimate of , prove that is inflated when .
Suppose that
where is an unknown parameter, 's are known and in , and are known positive constants, and 's are independent random variables satisfying , for some , and with an unknown .
-
Obtain the LSE of .
-
Obtain the BLUE of .
-
Show that both the LSE and BLUE are asymptotically normal and obtain the asymptotic relative efficiency of the BLUE with respect to the LSE.
Corresponding exercise in Shao (2003): 3.85.