Frechet and countably normed spaces
[22/9%]Suppose in a countably-normed space each subsequent seminorm majorizes the preceding one, but is not equivalent to it. Prove that is not normable.
Prove that the spaces and are separable Fréchet spaces.
Let be a countably-normed space, and let be a proper closed subspace of it. A vector is called an -perpendicular to if and . Prove that an -perpendicular to exists for any .
Let be a countably-normed Fréchet space. Prove that any system of nested closed balls of the space has nonempty intersection (compare with problem 2.68).
Let be a countably-normed Fréchet space. Prove that if is a finite-dimensional subspace of , and is an arbitrary vector from , then there is a vector in for which (compare with problem 2.70).
(Analogue of the Banach theorem on the inverse operator). Let and be countably-normed Fréchet spaces, and a linear continuous bijective operator. Prove that has a linear continuous inverse operator.
(Analogue of the Banach-Steinhaus theorem). Let be an arbitrary family of continuous linear operators from a countably-normed Fréchet space into a countably-normed Fréchet space , such that for every and the set is bounded. Prove that for every seminorm there exist seminorms and a constant such that for all and .
Prove that the spaces and are metrizable (and, moreover, are Fréchet spaces), while the space is not metrizable.
Let be completely regular and let be all continuous functions from into , topologized by the seminorms for compact in . Then is metrizable if and only if , where each is compact, , and if is any compact subset of , then for some . Verify this statement.
Let be locally compact and let be as in Exercise 2 above. Then is metrizable if and only if is -compact (that is, is the union of a sequence of compact sets). Also, the space of analytic functions on an open set , topologized by uniform convergence on compact subsets, is metrizable. Verify these statements.
If is a LCS, show that is metrizable if and only if is first countable. Is this equivalent to saying that is a set?
With the notation of Exercise 6, show that is metrizable if and only if is compact.
Prove the Open Mapping Theorem for Fréchet spaces.
Show that the space of all sequences of scalars (with the metric ) is linearly homeomorphic to and describe .
In the space of all continuous real functions on the line introduce the countable system of seminorms and set
For what is the ball of radius a convex set in ?
Let be a complete LCS and a domain in . We define the space as the collection of infinitely differentiable functions on with values in . If is the family of seminorms that determines the topology in , then the topology in is given by the family of seminorms
where is a compact subset of and is a multi-index, with . Prove that is a complete LCS, metrizable if is metrizable.
Let and be domains in and . Then is a domain in . In the notation of Problem 427 prove that
Prove that the spaces (Section 1.44) do not have the Heine-Borel property.
Prove that the topology of does not depend on the particular choice of , as long as this sequence satisfies the conditions specified in Section 1.44. Do the same for (Section 1.46).
In the setting of Section 1.46, prove that is a continuous mapping of into and also of into , for every multi-index .
Suppose is a Borel probability measure on a compact Hausdorff space is a Fréchet space, and is continuous. A partition of is, by definition, a finite collection of disjoint Borel subsets of whose union is . Prove that to every neighborhood of 0 in there corresponds a partition such that the difference
lies in for every choice of . (This exhibits the integral as a strong limit of "Riemann sums".) Suggestion: Take convex and balanced. If and if for every , then , provided that the sets are chosen so that whenever and lie in the same .
Suppose is a region in is a Fréchet space, and is holomorphic.
State and prove a theorem concerning the power series representation of , that is, concerning the formula , where .
Generalize Morera's theorem to -valued holomorphic functions.
For a sequence of complex holomorphic functions in , uniform convergence on compact subsets of implies that the limit is holomorphic. Does this generalize to -valued holomorphic functions?