Miscellaneous Problems
[41/100%]All three vertices of an equilateral triangle cannot be lattice points.
A polygon is equiangular, has sides, and all its vertices are lattice points. Then is either 4 or 8.
A polygon is equiangular, has sides, and all its vertices are lattice points. Then is either 4 or 8.
A regular polygon has sides and all its vertices are lattice points. Then .
A regular polygon has sides and all its vertices are lattice points. Then .
How thick must the trunks of the trees in a regularly spaced circular forest grow if they are to block completely the view from the center?
Let be a given positive integer. Let every lattice point that satisfies the inequality be the center of a circle of radius . If is sufficiently small, there exist rays running from the point 0, 0 to infinity without meeting the circles described above (the forest is transparent); such rays no longer exist if is sufficiently large (for the circles touch). Let be the value of which divides the two cases (limit of transparency). Then we have
In the plane draw the widest possible infinite straight ``path'', contained between two parallels and avoiding all the lattice points, that makes an angle equal to with the -axis. Denoting the width of this path by , determine .
Two lattice points and are termed congruent mod , if
Among any distinct lattice points there are always that are congruent mod .
In the plane consider a domain of area (Jordan content) . It may contain no lattice points, but can always be moved parallel to itself so that lattice points lie in it.
The lattice points in the closed first quadrant are enumerable. I.e. there exist functions defined for ordered pairs of non-negative integers that combine the following two properties:
The values assumed by form the set of numbers .
The function takes different values at distinct points; i.e. if are integers, , , , , , then .
There even exist rational entire functions that enumerate the lattice points, i.e. that have the properties (1) (2). An example is the function
and the function arising from it by interchanging and [the lattice points are counted successively on the line segments
Let be a rational entire function of degree
where denotes a rational entire homogeneous function of degree . If enumerates the lattice points, then clearly for , . If for , , and enumerates the lattice points, then the degree of is
[The number of lattice points contained inside the contour line is related to the enclosed area.]]
Consider the square domain , as a chess board with $n^2$ squares'', i.e. by means of straight lines parallel to the axis divide it into $n^2$ squares of unit area. The problem of the queens'' requires us to choose from the lattice points that constitute the centers of the squares lattice points that satisfy the inequalities
where ; . Replace the inequalities by the more restrictive ``incongruence relations''
and show that these have a solution if and only if is relatively prime to 6.
A regular polygon has sides and all its vertices are lattice points. Then is equal to 3, 4 or 6.
A regular polygon has sides and all its vertices are lattice points. Then is equal to 3, 4 or 6.
(continued). Give examples showing that the three cases and 6 can actually occur.
(continued). Give examples showing that the three cases and 6 can actually occur.
All the vertices of a regular polyhedron are lattice points. Then the polyhedron is either a cube or a tetrahedron or an octahedron.
All the vertices of a regular polyhedron are lattice points. Then the polyhedron is either a cube or a tetrahedron or an octahedron.
(continued). Give examples showing that the three cases mentioned above can actually occur.
(continued). Give examples showing that the three cases mentioned above can actually occur.
Let denote an odd prime number and let and be two complete systems of residues mod . Then the numbers do not form a complete system of residues mod .
Let the highest power of the odd prime number that divides the number be , . Then we have
according as is or is not divisible by , .
Let be the smallest prime number that divides . Then there exist two complete systems of residues mod
such that each of the lines
represents a complete system of residues mod . However then
is not a complete system of residues mod .
If is a prime number, then
are divisible by . (For the definitions of and see the introductions to Problem 197 and Problem 186 of Part I, respectively.)
If is a prime number, then
are divisible by . (For the definitions of and see the introductions to Problem 197 and Problem 186 of Part I, respectively.)
If is an odd prime, the coefficients of the Tchebychev polynomial (defined at the beginning of Part Six) are all divisible by , with the exception of the leading coefficient which is equal to .
If is an odd prime, the coefficients of the Tchebychev polynomial (defined at the beginning of Part Six) are all divisible by , with the exception of the leading coefficient which is equal to .
Every integral power of a number can be represented as the sum of consecutive odd integers.
A number in the sequence () is relatively prime to all the other numbers if and only if it is a prime number that exceeds . (That such a prime number always exists for was proved by Tchebychev. Cf. Oeuvres, Vol. 1, p. 63, St. Petersbourg 1899.)
The partial sums of the harmonic series
for are not equal to an integer. This follows directly from the Tchebychev theorem [249], but is to be proved without using that theorem.
The sum of two or more consecutive terms of the harmonic series, i.e. a sum of the form
cannot be an integer. If it is written in the form of a fraction in its lowest terms, then its denominator is even and its numerator is odd.
If the positive integer is divisible by all numbers that are , then is either 24 or a divisor of 24.
More generally show by an elementary argument the following: If , then there exist only a finite number of positive integers such that is divisible by .
Let be a prime number and relatively prime to . The arithmetic mean of the digits in a period of the expression of as a decimal fraction is 4.5 if and only if the length of the period is an even number.
The number , is a prime number if and only if
The following theorem given by Euler as a conjecture is true: The Diophantine equation
has no solution in positive integers .
If the prime number , then there always exist positive odd prime numbers , not necessarily distinct, that are all smaller than , and satisfy the equations
respectively. etc., are Legendre symbols defined in Problem 45 of Part V.]
The decimal fraction
(formed by writing consecutively all the prime numbers) is irrational. [249, 110.]
The number
is irrational.
The number is not only irrational, but it is also not an algebraic number of the second degree, i.e. it cannot satisfy an equation of the form
where are integers and are not all .
If the Euler (Mascheroni) constant were a rational number, then would have to be an integer for all integers from some point onward.
The number
is irrational.
The number
is irrational.
The numbers and are positive; may be rational or irrational and the same holds for , and so there are four possible cases. Show by means of examples that can be rational or irrational in each of these four cases (eight examples are required).
The numbers and are positive; may be rational or irrational and the same holds for , and so there are four possible cases. Show by means of examples that can be rational or irrational in each of these four cases (eight examples are required).
The question whether the number has the property that the arithmetic mean of its first decimal places converges to 4.5 must be left unresolved. If however the number has this property then the number has the same property.
Denote by the denominator of the th Bernoulli number [182]. Then we have
If denotes the Riemann zeta-function defined in the introduction to 39,
If denotes the Riemann zeta-function defined in the introduction to 39,
Let the arithmetic function be multiplicative [introduction to Chapter 1, § 6] and converge to 0 as tends to infinity through the prime numbers and the powers of prime numbers. Then also satisfies the stronger requirement that
as tends to infinity through all positive integers.
For every given positive number ,
Let the quadratic polynomial with integral coefficients be represented by the lattice point of a three-dimensional cubic lattice. Let the number of those lattice points that lie in the cube
and correspond to a reducible polynomial be . Prove that
(It is in a certain sense the ``normal case'' for a quadratic polynomial to be irreducible.)
The probability that a polynomial with integral coefficients of given degree is reducible is equal to 0. More precisely: Let be an integer, , and let denote the number of those lattice points of -dimensional space that lie in the cube
and correspond to a reducible polynomial . Then we have
(This result generalizes and improves 265.) [Problem 46 of Part II.]