Perron-Frobenius Theory of Nonnegative Matrices
[33/97%]Verify Perron's theorem by computing the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for
Find the right-hand Perron vector as well as the left-hand Perron vector .
Convince yourself that (8.2.2)-(8.2.5) are indeed true.
Statements (8.2.2)-(8.2.5) are properties of the Perron root and Perron vector established in the text for a positive matrix with : (8.2.2) ; (8.2.3) (called the Perron root); (8.2.4) ; (8.2.5) there exists an eigenvector such that .
Provide the details that explain why the Perron vector is uniquely defined.
Find the Perron root and the Perron vector for
where with .
Suppose that has .
Explain why exists.
Explain why is the projector onto along .
Explain why .
Prove that if every row (or column) sum of is equal to , then .
Prove that if , then
Recall the fact (established earlier in the book) that if entrywise, then .
To show the extent to which the hypothesis of positivity cannot be relaxed in Perron's theorem, construct examples of square matrices such that , but (i.e., has at least one zero entry), with that demonstrate the validity of the following statements. Different examples may be used for the different statements.
can be .
can be greater than .
can be greater than .
need not contain a positive eigenvector.
need not be the only eigenvalue on the spectral circle.
Establish the min-max version of the Collatz--Wielandt formula that says the Perron root for is given by , where
Notice that is used in the max-min version of the Collatz--Wielandt formula, but is used in the min-max version in the previous exercise. Give an example of a matrix that shows when is defined as
Let .
Show that is irreducible.
Find the Perron root and Perron vector for .
Find the number of eigenvalues on the spectral circle of .
Suppose that the index of imprimitivity of a nonnegative irreducible matrix is . Explain why must be singular with .
Suppose that is a nonnegative matrix that possesses a positive spectral radius and a corresponding positive eigenvector. Does this force to be irreducible?
Without computing the eigenvalues or the characteristic polynomial, explain why , where for
Determine whether
is reducible or irreducible.
Determine whether the matrix in Exercise 8.3.5 is primitive or imprimitive.
A matrix having row sums less than or equal to with at least one row sum less than is called a substochastic matrix.
Explain why for every substochastic matrix.
Prove that for every irreducible substochastic matrix.
A nonnegative matrix for which each row sum is is called a stochastic matrix (some say row-stochastic). Prove that if is nonnegative and irreducible with , then is similar to for some irreducible stochastic matrix .
Consider , where the 's are the components of the Perron vector for .
Wielandt constructed the matrix
to show that , but . Verify that this is true for .
In the Leslie population model, explain what happens to the vector as depending on whether , , or .
The Leslie population model divides a population of females into age groups , with the birth rate and the survival rate for group , and the vector of group sizes at time , satisfying for the Leslie matrix ; is the Perron root of , and are the respective Perron vectors of and .
Use the characteristic equation to show that the Leslie matrix (from the Leslie population model) is primitive even if (assuming all other 's and 's are positive).
A matrix is said to be essentially positive if is irreducible and for every . Prove that each of the following statements is equivalent to saying that is essentially positive.
There exists some such that is primitive.
for all .
Let be an essentially positive matrix as defined in Exercise 8.3.12. Prove that each of the following statements is true.
has an eigenpair , where is real and .
If is any eigenvalue for other than , then .
increases when any entry in is increased.
Let be an irreducible matrix, and let denote entries in . Prove that is primitive if and only if
Find the stationary distribution for
Does this stationary distribution represent a limiting distribution in the regular sense or only in the Cesaro sense?
A doubly-stochastic matrix is a nonnegative matrix having all row sums as well as all column sums equal to . For an irreducible -state Markov chain whose transition matrix is doubly stochastic, what is the long-run proportion of time spent in each state? What form do and (if it exists) have?
The purpose of this exercise is to show that doubly-stochastic matrices are not very interesting from a Markov-chain point of view. However, there is an interesting theoretical result (due to G. Birkhoff in 1946) that says the set of doubly-stochastic matrices forms a convex polyhedron in with the permutation matrices as the vertices.
Explain why for every irreducible stochastic matrix . Give an example to show that this need not be the case for reducible stochastic matrices.
Prove that the left-hand Perron vector for an irreducible stochastic matrix () is given by
where is the th principal minor determinant of order in .
What is if is singular?
Let be an irreducible stochastic matrix, and let be a principal submatrix of , where . Prove that .
Let be an irreducible stochastic matrix, and let be a principal submatrix of , where . Explain why is an M-matrix.
An M-matrix is a real nonsingular matrix such that for all and ; equivalently, is an M-matrix if and only if there exists a matrix and a real number such that .
Let () be an irreducible stochastic matrix. Explain why all principal minors of order in are positive.
Use the same assumptions that are used for the fail-safe system described in the worked example on two independent controls (Example 8.4.5), but use three controls, , , and , instead of two. Determine the mean time to failure starting with three proven controls, two proven but one untested control, and three untested controls.
The referenced example: a system has two independent controls that can prevent it from being destroyed, activated at discrete time points; the system is "under control" if at least one control holds, and destroyed if all controls fail simultaneously. A control that holds at one activation is reliable at the next; a control that fails and is replaced is only reliable at the next activation.
A mouse is placed in one chamber of the box shown in the figure below, and a cat is placed in another chamber. Each minute the doors to the chambers are opened just long enough to allow movement from one chamber to an adjacent chamber. Half of the time when the doors are opened, the cat doesn't leave the chamber it occupies. The same is true for the mouse. When either the cat or mouse moves, a door is chosen at random to pass through.
Figure 8.4.1: the mouse-in-a-box floor plan (chamber # 1 is connected to both # 2 and # 3, and # 2 is connected to # 3).
Explain why the cat and mouse must eventually end up in the same chamber, and determine the expected number of steps for this to occur.
Determine the probability that the cat will catch the mouse in chamber for each .