Section 2.5

Connected sums

[11/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 2.5.1

Given two compact connected surfaces M,NM, N with boundary, choose an embedding ff of {±1}×D1\left\{ \pm 1\right\} \times D^{1} which sends {−1}×D1\left\{ -1\right\} \times D^{1} into an arc in ∂M\partial M and sends {1}×D1\left\{ 1\right\} \times D^{1} into an arc in ∂N\partial N. The boundary connected sum of MM and NN, written M∪‾NM \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} N, is the surface M∪fD1×D1∪fNM \cup_{f} D^{1} \times D^{1} \cup_{f} N formed by attaching a 11-handle D1×D1D^1 \times D^1 joining MM and NN along these arcs.

If we choose different embeddings iM,iNi_{M}, i_{N} (in the analogous construction for the connected sum M#NM \# N, where a disk is removed from each of M,NM, N and a cylinder D1×S1D^{1} \times S^{1} is glued in along the two resulting boundary circles) giving iM′,iN′i_{M}', i_{N}', then there are orientation-preserving homeomorphisms hM:M→Mh_{M}: M \to M, hN:N→Nh_{N}: N \to N with hMiM=iM′h_{M} i_{M} = i_{M}', hNiN=iN′h_{N} i_{N} = i_{N}', induced by isotopies connecting iM,iM′i_{M}, i_{M}' and iN,iN′i_{N}, i_{N}'. These induce a homeomorphism between the two ways of forming the connected sum, by sending M∖{iM(0)}M \setminus \left\{ i_{M}(0)\right\} to M∖{iM′(0)}M \setminus \left\{ i_{M}'(0)\right\} via hMh_{M} and N∖{iN(0)}N \setminus \left\{ i_{N}(0)\right\} to N∖{iN′(0)}N \setminus \left\{ i_{N}'(0)\right\} via hNh_{N}.

Verify that this description of the homeomorphism in pieces does fit together to give a homeomorphism between the two ways of forming the connected sum with iM,iNi_{M}, i_{N} and iM′,iN′i_{M}', i_{N}'; that is, check that it is consistent with the identifications being made to form the connected sums.

?
Problem 2.5.2

Construct a homeomorphism from [−1,1]×[−1,1][-1,1] \times [-1,1] onto [−1,1]×[−1,0][-1,1] \times [-1,0] which fixes pointwise {−1}×[−1,0]∪[−1,1]×{−1}∪{1}×[−1,0]\left\{ -1\right\} \times [-1,0] \cup [-1,1] \times \left\{ -1\right\} \cup \left\{ 1\right\} \times [-1,0].

?
Problem 2.5.3

Show that M∪‾N≃N∪‾MM \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} N \simeq N \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} M, where ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} denotes boundary connected sum of surfaces with boundary (Exercise 2.5.1).

?
Problem 2.5.4

Show that (M∪‾N)∪‾Q≃M∪‾(N∪‾Q)(M \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} N) \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} Q \simeq M \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} (N \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} Q), where ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} denotes boundary connected sum of surfaces with boundary (Exercise 2.5.1).

?
Problem 2.5.5

Show that M#N≃N#MM \# N \simeq N \# M, where #\# denotes connected sum of surfaces (possibly without boundary).

?
Problem 2.5.6

Show that (M#N)#Q≃M#(N#Q)(M \# N) \# Q \simeq M \# (N \# Q).

?
Problem 2.5.7

Show that M∪‾D2≃MM \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} D^{2} \simeq M, where ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} denotes boundary connected sum (Exercise 2.5.1) and D2D^{2} is the closed disk.

?
Remark.
?

Write M∪‾D2M \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} D^{2} as M∪R1∪R2M \cup R_{1} \cup R_{2}, where R1,R2R_{1}, R_{2} are rectangles joined along a segment in their boundaries, and use the idea of Exercise 2.5.2.

Problem 2.5.8

If NN is a surface without boundary, and N(p)N_{(p)} denotes NN with pp disjoint disks removed from its interior, show that N(p)∪‾S(q)≃N(p+q−1)N_{(p)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} S_{(q)} \simeq N_{(p+q-1)}, where SS is the 22-sphere and ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} denotes boundary connected sum (Exercise 2.5.1).

?
Remark.
?

Consider first the case q=1q = 1.

Problem 2.5.9

Show that M#S2≃MM \# S^{2} \simeq M, where S2S^{2} is the 22-sphere.

?
Remark.
?

Think about what is removed and what is filled in when we form the connected sum with S2S^{2}. Alternatively, use Exercise 2.5.7 together with the fact that M#N≃(M(1)∪‾N(1))∪h2M \# N \simeq (M_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} N_{(1)}) \cup h^{2}, where M(1),N(1)M_{(1)}, N_{(1)} denote M,NM, N with one disk removed, ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} is boundary connected sum, and the final 22-handle fills in the one remaining boundary circle.

Problem 2.5.10

If KK is the Klein bottle, use K≃P#PK \simeq P \# P (where PP is the projective plane) to show that K(1)≃P(1)∪‾P(1)K_{(1)} \simeq P_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} P_{(1)}, where the subscript (1)(1) denotes removing one disk and ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} is boundary connected sum (Exercise 2.5.1).

?
Problem 2.5.11
?
(a)

Show that A#B#C≃(A(1)∪‾B(1)∪‾C(1))∪h2A \# B \# C \simeq (A_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} B_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} C_{(1)}) \cup h^{2}, where ∪‾\mathbin {\overline{\cup }} is boundary connected sum and the subscript (1)(1) denotes removing one disk. Use this to show that the boundary connected sum of kk copies of A(1)A_{(1)} is homeomorphic to the connected sum of kk copies of AA with one disk removed; that is, denoting the connected sum of kk copies of AA by A(k)A^{(k)}, show that A(1)(k)≃A(1)∪‾⋯∪‾A(1)A^{(k)}_{(1)} \simeq A_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} \cdots \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} A_{(1)} (kk copies).

(b)

Then show that A(k)∪‾S(p)≃A(1)∪‾⋯∪‾A(1)∪‾S(p)A^{(k)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} S_{(p)} \simeq A_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} \cdots \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} A_{(1)} \mathbin {\overline{\cup }} S_{(p)} (kk copies of A(1)A_{(1)}), where SS is the 22-sphere. (This space is denoted A(p)(k)A^{(k)}_{(p)}.)