Measurable Spaces and Functions
[30/0%]Show that is a -algebra on .
Verify both bullet points in Example 2.28.
Example 2.28 (smallest -algebra):
-
Suppose is a set and is the set of subsets of that consist of exactly one element: . Then the smallest -algebra on containing is the set of all subsets of such that is countable or is countable, as you should verify.
-
Suppose . Then the smallest -algebra on containing is , as you should verify.
Suppose is the smallest -algebra on containing . Prove that is the collection of Borel subsets of .
Suppose is the smallest -algebra on containing . Prove that is the collection of Borel subsets of .
Suppose is the smallest -algebra on containing . Prove that is the collection of Borel subsets of .
Suppose is the smallest -algebra on containing . Prove that is the collection of Borel subsets of .
Prove that the collection of Borel subsets of is translation invariant. More precisely, prove that if is a Borel set and , then is a Borel set.
Prove that the collection of Borel subsets of is dilation invariant. More precisely, prove that if is a Borel set and , then (which is defined to be ) is a Borel set.
Give an example of a measurable space and a function such that is -measurable but is not -measurable.
Show that the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with the digit 5 appearing infinitely often is a Borel set.
Suppose is a -algebra on a set and . Let .
Show that .
Show that is a -algebra on .
Suppose is a function.
For , let
Prove that is an open subset of for each .
Prove that the set of points at which is continuous equals .
Conclude that the set of points at which is continuous is a Borel set.
Suppose is a measurable space, are disjoint subsets of , and are distinct nonzero real numbers. Prove that is an -measurable function if and only if .
Suppose is a sequence of functions from a set to . Explain why
Suppose is a measurable space and is a sequence of measurable functions from to . Prove that
is an -measurable subset of .
Suppose is a set and is a disjoint sequence of subsets of such that . Let .
Show that is a -algebra on .
Prove that a function from to is -measurable if and only if the function is constant on for every .
Suppose is a -algebra on a set and . Let
Prove that is a -algebra on .
Suppose is a function. Prove that is measurable with respect to if and only if is measurable with respect to and is constant on .
Suppose is a Borel subset of and is a function such that is a countable set. Prove is a Borel measurable function.
Suppose is differentiable at every element of . Prove that is a Borel measurable function from to .
Suppose is a nonempty set and is the -algebra on consisting of all subsets of that are either countable or have a countable complement in . Give a characterization of the -measurable real-valued functions on .
Suppose is a measurable space and are -measurable functions. Prove that if for all , then (which is the function whose value at equals ) is an -measurable function.
Prove 2.52.
2.52 (condition for measurable function): Suppose is a measurable space and is a function such that for all . Then is an -measurable function.
Suppose and is an increasing function. Prove that is continuous at every element of except for a countable subset of .
Suppose is a strictly increasing function. Prove that the inverse function is a continuous function.
Note that this exercise does not have as a hypothesis that is continuous.
Suppose is a strictly increasing function and is a Borel set. Prove that is a Borel set.
Suppose and is an increasing function. Prove that there exists a sequence of strictly increasing functions from to such that
for every .
Suppose and is a bounded increasing function. Prove that there exists an increasing function such that for all .
Prove or give a counterexample: If is a measurable space and
is a function such that for every , then is an -measurable function.
Suppose is a Borel measurable function. Define by
Prove that is a Borel measurable function.
Give an example of a measurable space and a family such that each is an -measurable function from to , but the function defined by
is not -measurable.
Compare this exercise to 2.53, where the index set is rather than .
Show that
for every .
This example is due to Henri Lebesgue.