Stochastic exponentials and exponential martingales

[11/73%]
Show
LaTeX

Let W={Wt,t⩾0}W = \left\{ W_{t}, t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Brownian motion with the natural filtration F=(Ft)t⩾0\mathbb {F} = \left(\mathscr {F}_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0}.

Find all α,β∈R\alpha , \beta \in \mathbb {R} for which the process

X={exp(αWt+βt),t⩾0} X = \left\{ \mathrm{exp}\left(\alpha W_{t}+\beta t\right), t \geqslant 0\right\}

is a martingale.

?

Let W={Wt,t⩾0}W = \left\{ W_{t}, t \geqslant 0\right\} be a Brownian motion with the natural filtration F=(Ft)t⩾0\mathbb {F} = \left(\mathscr {F}_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0}.

For α,x∈R\alpha , x \in \mathbb {R} and t⩾0t \geqslant 0 define the function

h(α,x,t)=exp(αx−α2t/2). h(\alpha , x, t) = \mathrm{exp}\left(\alpha x-\alpha ^{2} t / 2\right) .

Set

hk(x,t)=∂kh(α,x,t)∂αk∣α=0,k⩾1 h_{k}(x, t) = \left.\frac{\partial ^{k} h(\alpha , x, t)}{\partial \alpha ^{k}}\right|_{\alpha = 0}, \quad k \geqslant 1

Prove that (hk(Wt,t),Ft)t⩾0\left(h_{k}\left(W_{t}, t\right), \mathscr {F}_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} is a martingale for each k⩾1k \geqslant 1 (note also that, by Exercise 13, the process {h(α,Wt,t),t⩾0}\left\{ h\left(\alpha , W_{t}, t\right), t \geqslant 0\right\} is a martingale for each α∈R\alpha \in \mathbb {R} ). Thus the processes Wt,Wt2−t,Wt3−3tWtW_{t}, W_{t}^{2}-t, W_{t}^{3}-3 t W_{t}, Wt4−6tWt2+3t2,…W_{t}^{4}-6 t W_{t}^{2}+3 t^{2}, \ldots are martingales (t⩾0)(t \geqslant 0).

?

Definition 10. We say that a function ff belongs to the class J1J_{1} if f:[0,∞)×Ω→Rf:[0, \infty ) \times \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is progressively measurable and

P(∫0tf2(s,ω)ds<∞)=1,t>0(84) \mathbb {P}\left(\int _{0}^{t} f^{2}(s, \omega ) d s < \infty \right) = 1, \quad t > 0 \tag {84}

Consider, for f∈J1f \in J_{1}, the process

Zt=exp(∫0tf(s,ω)dWs−12∫0tf2(s,ω)ds),t⩾0(86) Z_{t} = \mathrm{exp}\left(\int _{0}^{t} f(s, \omega ) d W_{s}-\frac{1}{2} \int _{0}^{t} f^{2}(s, \omega ) d s\right), \quad t \geqslant 0 \tag {86}

Prove that dZt=Ztf(t,ω)dWtd Z_{t} = Z_{t} f(t, \omega ) d W_{t} (as before, all differential relations are shorthand for the corresponding integral ones).

?

Exponential martingale, geometric Brownian motion. Let WW be a standard Wiener process and define S(t)=eat+bW(t)S(t) = e^{a t+b W(t)}. Show that:

?
(a)

SS is a Markov process,

(b)

SS is a martingale (with respect to the filtration generated by WW) if and only if a+12b2=0a+\frac{1}{2} b^{2} = 0, and in this case⁡E[S(t)]=1\operatorname {case} \mathbb {E}\left[S(t)\right] = 1.

Let WW be a standard Wiener process and let X(t)=exp⁡{iθW(t)+12θ2t}X(t) = \exp \left\{ i \theta W(t)+\frac{1}{2} \theta^{2} t\right\} where i=−1i = \sqrt{-1}. Show that XX is a martingale with respect to the filtration given by Ft=σ({W(u):u≤t})\mathcal{F}_{t} = \sigma (\left\{ W(u): u \leq t\right\} ).

?

Let (Wt,t≥0)\left(W_{t}, t \geq 0\right) be a Wiener process. Find all pairs (α,β)∈R2(\alpha , \beta ) \in \mathbb {R}^{2} such that the process

Xt=exp(αWt+βt),t≥0 X_{t}=\mathrm{exp}\left(\alpha W_{t}+\beta t\right), \quad t \geq 0

is a martingale (submartingale, supermartingale) with respect to the natural filtration of the process WtW_{t}.

?

Let (Xt,t⩾0)\left(X_{t}, t \geqslant 0\right) be a process from L2((0,+∞)×Ω,PRED,mes×P)L^{2}\left((0,+\infty ) \times \Omega , \mathcal{PRED}, \text{mes} \times \mathbb {P}\right). Prove that then the process

Yt=exp⁡(∫0tXsdWs−∫0tXs2ds), Y_{t}=\exp \left(\int _{0}^{t} X_{s} d W_{s}-\int _{0}^{t} X_{s}^{2} d s\right),

satisfies the relation E[Yt]⩽1\mathbb {E}\left[Y_{t}\right] \leqslant 1 for all t>0t>0 (we assume that all necessary processes are integrable).

?

Let (Xt,t⩾0)\left(X_{t}, t \geqslant 0\right) be a bounded process from L2((0,+∞)×Ω,PREDL^{2}((0,+\infty ) \times \Omega , \mathcal{P R E D}, mes ×P)\times \mathbb {P}), i.e., there exists C>0C>0 such that ∣Xt∣⩽C\left|X_{t}\right| \leqslant C for all t⩾0t \geqslant 0. Prove that then the process

Yt=exp⁡(∫0tXsdWs−12∫0tXs2ds),t⩾0, Y_{t}=\exp \left(\int _{0}^{t} X_{s} d W_{s}-\frac{1}{2} \int _{0}^{t} X_{s}^{2} d s\right), t \geqslant 0,

is a martingale.

?

Let (Bt,Ft)t⩾0\left(B_{t}, \mathscr {F}_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} be a BM1\mathrm{BM}^{1}. Show that Xt=exp⁡(aBt+bt),t⩾0X_{t} = \exp \left(a B_{t}+b t\right), t \geqslant 0, is a martingale if, and only if, a2/2+b=0a^{2} / 2+b = 0.

?

Let (Bt)t⩾0\left(B_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} be a BM1\mathrm{BM}^{1}. Apply Doob's maximal inequality (A.13) to the exponential martingale Mtξ:=exp⁡(ξBt−12ξ2t)M_{t}^{\xi }: = \exp \left(\xi B_{t} - \frac{1}{2} \xi^{2} t\right) to show that for all x,ξ>0x, \xi > 0

P(sup⁡s⩽t(Bs−12ξs)>x)⩽e−xξ \mathbb {P}\left(\sup _{s \leqslant t}\left(B_{s} - \frac{1}{2} \xi s\right) > x\right) \leqslant e^{ - x \xi }

(This inequality can be used for the upper bound in the proof of Theorem 12.1, avoiding the combination of (12.2) and the upper bound in (12.1).)

?

State and prove the dd - dimensional version of Lemma 19.1.

?

References

[БуШи05] Булинский А.В., Ширяев А.Н. Теория случайных процессов. ФИЗМАТЛИТ, 2005.
[GrSt20] Grimmett G.R., Stirzaker D.R. Probability and Random Processes. 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2020.
[ЖРШ16] Жуковский М.Е., Родионов И.В., Шабанов Д.А. Основы теории случайных процессов. МФТИ, 2016.
[Sch21] Schilling R.L. Brownian Motion: A Guide to Random Processes and Stochastic Calculus. 3rd ed., De Gruyter, 2021.