The growth of Brownian paths
[7/100%]Let be a . Use the Borel - Cantelli lemma to show that the running maximum : = cannot grow faster than for any . Use this to show that
We can obtain the exceptional set uniformly: on , and .
Let be a . Apply Doob's maximal inequality (A.13) to the exponential martingale to show that for all
(This inequality can be used for the upper bound in the proof of Theorem 12.1, avoiding the combination of (12.2) and the upper bound in (12.1).)
Show that the proof of Khinchine's LIL, Theorem 12.1, can be modified to give
Dupuis's paper [4] shows LILs for processes with stationary independent increments, using estimates of the type . If , an LIL for holds if, and only if, an LIL for holds.
Let be a . Use Theorem 12.5 to show that is an upper function for .
Let be a . Deduce from Theorem 12.5 the following test for upper functions in large time. Assume that is a positive function such that is decreasing and is increasing. Then
Let be a one - dimensional Brownian motion, and . Show that
;
;
.
Let be a one - dimensional process satisfying (B0), (B1), (B2). Assume, in addition, that is continuous in probability, i.e. for all . A function is said to be of regular growth, if there exist functions , such that and
Show that for every symmetric (i.e. ) process and increasing of regular growth
Remark. is a so - called Lévy process. Its paths are not continuous, but they may have jump discontinuities which happen, however, never at fixed times. This is due to the continuity "in probability". See [231] and [235, Chapter X] for more on this topic.
With minor variations, this proof also works for ; the main change needed is in the step using , which must be replaced by an Ottaviani--Skorokhod-type bound — see [9, p.295] for details.