Dead-time counters and replacement models
[4/100%]A Type 1 counter records the arrivals of radioactive particles. Suppose that the arrival process is Poisson with intensity , and that the counter is locked for a dead period of fixed length after each detected arrival. Show that the detection process is a renewal process with interarrival time distribution if . Find an expression for .
Particles arrive at a Type 1 counter in the manner of a renewal process ; each detected arrival locks the counter for a dead period of random positive length. Show that
where is the distribution function of a typical dead period.
Particles are detected by a Type 2 counter of the following sort. The incoming particles constitute a Poisson process with intensity . The th particle locks the counter for a length of time, and annuls any after-effect of its predecessors. Suppose that are independent of each other and of the Poisson process, each having distribution function . The counter is unlocked at time 0.
Let be the (maximal) length of the first interval of time during which the counter is locked. Show that satisfies
Solve for in terms of , and evaluate the ensuing expression in the case where .
A specific component in a cryptometer has an -distributed lifetime, . If replacement is made as soon as a component fails, and if failures during replacements during , then is, of course, a Poisson process. Let be these usual interreplacement times, and suppose, instead, that the th component is replaced:
After time , that is, as soon as the component fails or reaches age , whichever comes first. Show that the replacement process is not a Poisson process.
After time , where is a sequence of independent, -distributed random variables, , which is independent of . Show that the replacement process is a Poisson process and determine the intensity.