Digit and orbit frequencies via the Birkhoff theorem
[4/100%]The measure is assumed to be finite and to satisfy the normalization condition (such measures are called probability measures). Let be a transformation of the set . A set is called invariant if . A transformation preserving the measure is called ergodic if for every invariant set one of the following two holds: either , or .
Consider the irrational shift
It is ergodic by 2.21a). By the ergodic theorem, for any summable function on and for almost all the equality
holds.
Prove that if , then for the shift one can assert more, namely that equality (1) holds for every . (First assume that , and then consider the general case.)
Prove that if for , for , then
for all .
If is replaced by an arbitrary sequence , then property b) is called uniform distribution of this sequence (see [PS], [KN]).
For a uniformly distributed sequence and a function continuous on , a relation analogous to (1) holds:
In particular,
This condition is not only necessary but also sufficient for uniform distribution. The latter statement is called Weyl's criterion (cf. problem I.3.9).
The Birkhoff--Khinchin ergodic theorem (see [Bi], [KSF]): let be a transformation of a set preserving a probability measure , and let be a measurable function such that . Then for almost every (with respect to the measure ) the limit
exists, called the mean value of the function along the trajectory of the point . Moreover the function is invariant and . If is ergodic, then turns out to be a constant (see problem 2.20), equal to (i.e. the mean value of on ).
Two points move along a circle, jumping once a second by the same angle, which is incommensurable with . What fraction of a sufficiently long time interval will both points simultaneously lie on some (fixed in advance) semicircle, if at the initial moment the angle between the points was equal to ?
Answer the same question if every second one point moves by an angle , and the other by an angle , where the numbers , are linearly independent over (see the definition at the beginning of 4 of Chapter VII).
Let be the binary expansion of a number . Using the ergodicity of the doubling transformation (see problem 2.21b)), prove that for almost all the limit exists (the frequency of occurrence of the digit one), and find it. Solve the analogous problem for expansions in a base- fraction (cf. problems IX.2.14, IX.2.16).
Let be the first digit of the decimal representation of the number , i.e., What is the frequency of occurrence of the digit in this sequence?
As is well known, every number from the interval can be uniquely represented as a continued fraction
which is also written as , where , are natural numbers. Such a fraction contains finitely many terms only when is rational. The finite continued fraction is uniquely written as an irreducible fraction . The value of an infinite continued fraction is understood as the limit of the finite ones:
the number is called the convergent. It is easily verified that
A variety of information about continued fractions can be gleaned from the book . Associated with the expansion of numbers into continued fractions is the Gauss transformation
Indeed, let . Then , from which it follows that . Using , the numbers are written as follows:
The Gauss transformation preserves the measure (see problem 2.5). The measure is a probability measure for . The reader can learn about interesting applications of ergodic theory to number theory and continued fractions in [Po].