Lévy's characterization of Brownian motion
[12/58%]Show that and are local martingales, where is defined in the statement of Theorem 12.2 .
Suppose is a continuous local martingale with respect to a filtration satisfying the usual conditions, is a stopping time with respect to , and . Prove that has the same law as a Brownian motion stopped at time .
Here is a multidimensional version of Lévy's theorem. Let be a filtration satisfying the usual conditions. Suppose is a -dimensional process such that each component is a continuous martingale with respect to with . Suppose that if . Prove that is a -dimensional Brownian motion.
Let be a filtration satisfying the usual conditions. Let be a strictly increasing continuous process adapted to with , a.s. Suppose is a -dimensional process such that each component is a continuous martingale with respect to and . Suppose that if . Prove that is a time change of -dimensional Brownian motion.
Prove that the equation
where , has at least two solutions (but "weak" ones). Moreover, on some probability spaces this equation may have no "strong" solution at all.
Let if and otherwise.
Show that defines a standard Wiener process, where is itself such a process.
Deduce that is the solution of the with .
Use the result of Problem (13.12.16) with to show that is also a solution of this SDE.
Use the results of Example (12.7.10) and Theorem (13.8.11) to deduce that any solution of the SDE has the fdds of the Wiener process. [You have shown that solutions of the SDE are not unique in a pathwise sense, but do have unique fdds.]
Let and be independent standard Wiener processes. Show that, with ,
is a Wiener process. [Hint: Use Theorem (13.8.11) and Example (12.7.10).] Hence show that the squared process , called the squared Bessel process, satisfies
Generalize this conclusion to dimensions.
Let be a and set .
Show that the stochastic integrals and exist.
Show that is a .
Let be a and , an analytic function. If , then , is a .
Show that is a .
Let be a Poisson process with intensity (see Problem 10.1 for the definition). Show that for both and are martingales. Explain why this does not contradict Theorem 19.5.
Let , be a two - dimensional Brownian motion, i.e. are independent one - dimensional Brownian motions. Show that for all
is a one - dimensional Brownian motion.