Lévy's characterization of Brownian motion

[12/58%]
Show
LaTeX

Show that WtW_{t} and Wt2−tW_{t}^{2}-t are local martingales, where WW is defined in the statement of Theorem 12.2 .

?

Suppose MtM_{t} is a continuous local martingale with respect to a filtration {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\} satisfying the usual conditions, TT is a stopping time with respect to {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\}, and ⟨M⟩t=t∧T\langle M\rangle_{t}=t \wedge T. Prove that Mt∧TM_{t \wedge T} has the same law as a Brownian motion stopped at time TT.

?

Here is a multidimensional version of Lévy's theorem. Let {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\} be a filtration satisfying the usual conditions. Suppose (Mt1,…,Mtd)\left(M_{t}^{1}, \ldots , M_{t}^{d}\right) is a dd-dimensional process such that each component MtiM_{t}^{i} is a continuous martingale with respect to {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\} with ⟨Mi⟩t=t\left\langle M^{i}\right\rangle_{t}=t. Suppose that ⟨Mi,Mj⟩t=0\left\langle M^{i}, M^{j}\right\rangle_{t}=0 if i≠ji \neq j. Prove that (Mt1,…,Mtd)\left(M_{t}^{1}, \ldots , M_{t}^{d}\right) is a dd-dimensional Brownian motion.

?

Let {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\} be a filtration satisfying the usual conditions. Let AtA_{t} be a strictly increasing continuous process adapted to {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\} with lim⁡t→∞At=∞\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty } A_{t}=\infty, a.s. Suppose (Mt1,…,Mtd)\left(M_{t}^{1}, \ldots , M_{t}^{d}\right) is a dd-dimensional process such that each component MtiM_{t}^{i} is a continuous martingale with respect to {Ft}\left\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\right\} and ⟨Mi⟩t=At\left\langle M^{i}\right\rangle_{t}=A_{t}. Suppose that ⟨Mi,Mj⟩t=0\left\langle M^{i}, M^{j}\right\rangle_{t}=0 if i≠ji \neq j. Prove that (Mt1,…,Mtd)\left(M_{t}^{1}, \ldots , M_{t}^{d}\right) is a time change of dd-dimensional Brownian motion.

?

Prove that the equation

dXt=σ(Xt)dWt,t∈[0,1],X0=0 d X_{t} = \sigma \left(X_{t}\right) d W_{t}, \quad t \in [0,1], \quad X_{0} = 0

where σ(x)=sgn⁡x\sigma (x) = \operatorname {sgn} x, has at least two solutions (but "weak" ones). Moreover, on some probability spaces this equation may have no "strong" solution at all.

?

Let sign⁡(x)=1\operatorname {sign}(x) = 1 if x>0x > 0 and sign⁡(x)=−1\operatorname {sign}(x) = -1 otherwise.

?
(a)

Show that Vt=∫0tsign⁡(Ws)dWsV_{t} = \int_{0}^{t} \operatorname {sign}\left(W_{s}\right) d W_{s} defines a standard Wiener process, where WW is itself such a process.

(b)

Deduce that VV is the solution of the SDE⁡dX=sign⁡(Xt)dW\operatorname {SDE} d X = \operatorname {sign}\left(X_{t}\right) d W with W(0)=0W(0) = 0.

(c)

Use the result of Problem (13.12.16) with u=0u = 0 to show that −V-V is also a solution of this SDE.

(d)

Use the results of Example (12.7.10) and Theorem (13.8.11) to deduce that any solution of the SDE has the fdds of the Wiener process. [You have shown that solutions of the SDE are not unique in a pathwise sense, but do have unique fdds.]

Let XX and YY be independent standard Wiener processes. Show that, with Rt2=Xt2+Yt2R_{t}^{2} = X_{t}^{2}+Y_{t}^{2},

Zt=∫0tXsRsdXs+∫0tYsRsdYs Z_{t} = \int _{0}^{t} \frac{X_{s}}{R_{s}} d X_{s}+\int _{0}^{t} \frac{Y_{s}}{R_{s}} d Y_{s}

is a Wiener process. [Hint: Use Theorem (13.8.11) and Example (12.7.10).] Hence show that the squared process R2R^{2}, called the squared Bessel process, satisfies

Rt2=2∫0tRsdWs+2t R_{t}^{2} = 2 \int _{0}^{t} R_{s} d W_{s}+2 t

Generalize this conclusion to nn dimensions.

?

Let Bt=(bt,βt),t⩾0B_{t} = \left(b_{t}, \beta_{t}\right), t \geqslant 0 be a BM2\mathrm{BM}^{2} and set rt:=∣Bt∣=bt2+βt2r_{t}: = \left|B_{t}\right| = \sqrt{b_{t}^{2}+\beta_{t}^{2}}.

?
(a)

Show that the stochastic integrals ∫0tbs/rsdbs\int_{0}^{t} b_{s} / r_{s} d b_{s} and ∫0tβs/rsdβs\int_{0}^{t} \beta_{s} / r_{s} d \beta_{s} exist.

(b)

Show that Wt:=∫0tbs/rsdbs+∫0tβs/rsdβsW_{t}: = \int_{0}^{t} b_{s} / r_{s} d b_{s}+\int_{0}^{t} \beta_{s} / r_{s} d \beta_{s} is a BM1\mathrm{BM}^{1}.

Let Bt=(bt,βt),t⩾0B_{t} = \left(b_{t}, \beta_{t}\right), t \geqslant 0 be a BM2\mathrm{BM}^{2} and f(x+iy)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y),x,y∈Rf(x+i y) = u(x, y)+i v(x, y), x, y \in \mathbb {R}, an analytic function. If ux2+uy2=1u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2} = 1, then (u(bt,βt),v(bt,βt)),t⩾0\left(u\left(b_{t}, \beta_{t}\right), v\left(b_{t}, \beta_{t}\right)\right), t \geqslant 0, is a BM2\mathrm{BM}^{2}.

?

Show that βt=∫0tsgn⁡(Bs)dBs\beta_{t} = \int_{0}^{t} \operatorname {sgn}\left(B_{s}\right) d B_{s} is a BM1\mathrm{BM}^{1}.

?

Let (Nt)t⩾0\left(N_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} be a Poisson process with intensity λ=1\lambda = 1 (see Problem 10.1 for the definition). Show that for FtN:=σ(Nr:r⩽t)\mathscr {F}_{t}^{N}: = \sigma \left(N_{r}: r \leqslant t\right) both Xt:=Nt−tX_{t}: = N_{t} - t and Xt2−tX_{t}^{2} - t are martingales. Explain why this does not contradict Theorem 19.5.

?

Let Bt=(bt,βt),t⩾0B_{t} = \left(b_{t}, \beta_{t}\right), t \geqslant 0, be a two - dimensional Brownian motion, i.e. (bt)t⩾0,(βt)t⩾0\left(b_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0},\left(\beta_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} are independent one - dimensional Brownian motions. Show that for all σ1,σ2>0\sigma_{1}, \sigma_{2} > 0

Wt:=σ1σ12+σ22bt+σ2σ12+σ22βt,t⩾0 W_{t}: = \frac{\sigma _{1}}{\sqrt{\sigma _{1}^{2}+\sigma _{2}^{2}}} b_{t}+\frac{\sigma _{2}}{\sqrt{\sigma _{1}^{2}+\sigma _{2}^{2}}} \beta _{t}, \quad t \geqslant 0

is a one - dimensional Brownian motion.

?

References

[Bas11] Bass R.F. Stochastic Processes. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[БуШи05] Булинский А.В., Ширяев А.Н. Теория случайных процессов. ФИЗМАТЛИТ, 2005.
[GrSt20] Grimmett G.R., Stirzaker D.R. Probability and Random Processes. 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2020.
[Sch21] Schilling R.L. Brownian Motion: A Guide to Random Processes and Stochastic Calculus. 3rd ed., De Gruyter, 2021.