Gabor systems and frames

[17/100%]
Show
LaTeX

Given g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), show that {MbnTakg}k,n∈Z\left\{ M_{b n} T_{a k} g\right\}_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if {TakMbng}k,n∈Z\left\{ T_{a k} M_{b n} g\right\}_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} is a frame, and in this case their frame operators coincide.

?
Problem 11.3 from Heil C. "A Basis Theory Primer" [Hei11]More problems in Chapter 11 "Gabor Bases and Frames"

Let G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) be a Gabor frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?
(a)

Show that the frame operator SS commutes with MbnM_{b n} and TakT_{a k} for all k,n∈Zk, n \in \mathbb {Z}, and use this to show that S−1S^{-1} also commutes with MbnM_{b n} and TakT_{a k}.

(b)

Show that the canonical dual frame of G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is the Gabor frame G(g~,a,b)\mathcal{G}(\widetilde{g}, a, b) where g~=S−1g\widetilde{g} = S^{-1} g.

(c)

Suppose that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Riesz basis if and only if ⟨g,g~⟩=1\left\langle g, \widetilde{g} \right\rangle = 1.

(d)

Show that the canonical Parseval frame of a lattice Gabor frame is another lattice Gabor frame. Specifically, if G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and we set g♯=S−1/2gg^{\sharp } = S^{-1 / 2} g, where SS is the frame operator, then G(g♯,a,b)\mathcal{G}\left(g^{\sharp }, a, b\right) is a Parseval frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Fix g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and a,b>0a, b > 0. Recall from equations (9.2) and (9.3) that the Fourier transform interchanges translation with modulation. Use this to show that

G(g,a,b) is a frame ⟺G(g^,b,a) is a frame.  \mathcal{G}(g, a, b) \text{ is a frame } \Longleftrightarrow \mathcal{G}(\widehat{g}, b, a) \text{ is a frame. }
?
?
(a)

Show that G(χ[0,1],1,1)\mathcal{G}\left(\chi_{[0,1]}, 1,1\right) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

Show that G(χ[0,1],a,1)\mathcal{G}\left(\chi_{[0,1]}, a, 1\right) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if 0<a≤10 < a \leq 1.

Remark Amazingly, there is no known explicit characterization of the set of points (a,b)(a, b) such that G(χ[0,1],a,b)\mathcal{G}\left(\chi_{[0,1]}, a, b\right) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), see [Jan03].

Problem 11.6 from Heil C. "A Basis Theory Primer" [Hei11]More problems in Chapter 11 "Gabor Bases and Frames"

Assume that the hypotheses of part (a) of Theorem 11.4 are satisfied, i.e., 0<ab≤1,supp⁡(g)⊆[0,b−1]0 < a b \leq 1, \operatorname {supp}\left(g\right) \subseteq \left[0, b^{-1}\right], and equation (11.3) holds. Prove the following statements about the frame G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b).

?
(a)

The frame operator is pointwise multiplication by b−1G0b^{-1} G_{0}, i.e., Sf=b−1G0fS f = b^{-1} G_{0} f for f∈L2(R)f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

The canonical dual frame is G(g~,a,b)\mathcal{G}(\widetilde{g}, a, b) where g~=bg/G0\widetilde{g} = b g / G_{0}.

(c)

If ab=1a b = 1 then G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Riesz basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(d)

If 0<ab<10 < a b < 1 then G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a redundant frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Show that if g∈Cc(R)g \in C_{c}(\mathbb {R}) is not the zero function, then there exist some a,b>0a, b > 0 such that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?

Let g∈Cc(R)g \in C_{c}(\mathbb {R}) satisfy supp⁡(g)=[0,b0−1]\operatorname {supp}\left(g\right) = \left[0, b_{0}^{-1}\right] and g(x)>0g(x) > 0 for x∈(0,b0−1)x \in \left(0, b_{0}^{-1}\right). Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) for 0<a<b0−10 < a < b_{0}^{-1} and 0<b<b00 < b < b_{0}.

?

Let 0<ab<10 < a b < 1 be fixed. By Exercise 11.9, there exists a function f∈Cc∞(R)f \in C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}) supported in [0,b−1]\left[0, b^{-1}\right] such that f>0f > 0 on (0,b−1)\left(0, b^{-1}\right).

?
(a)

Set F0(x)=∑k∈Z∣f(x−ak)∣2F_{0}(x) = \sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}}\left|f(x-a k)\right|^{2} and show that g=f/F01/2g = f / F_{0}^{1 / 2} is infinitely differentiable, compactly supported, and satisfies ∑k∈Z∣g(x−ak)∣2=1\sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}}\left|g(x-a k)\right|^{2} = 1 everywhere.

(b)

Show that there exists a function g∈Cc∞(R)g \in C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}) such that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Parseval frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Fix g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and a,b>0a, b > 0.

?
(a)

Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Riesz basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if it is a frame and ab=1a b = 1.

(b)

Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if it is a tight frame, ab=1a b = 1, and ∥g∥L2=1\left\| g\right\|_{L^{2}} = 1.

Suppose that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Without appealing to Theorem 11.9, show that {Mk/ag^}n∈Z\left\{ M_{k / a} \widehat{g}\right\}_{n \in \mathbb {Z}} and {Mn/bg^}n∈Z\left\{ M_{n / b} \widehat{g}\right\}_{n \in \mathbb {Z}} are Riesz sequences in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?

Assuming Theorem 11.9, show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a tight frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if G(g,1/b,1/a)\mathcal{G}(g, 1 / b, 1 / a) is an orthogonal sequence in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?

Let gg be the function defined in Example 11.11. Show that G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1,1) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), but g∉W(L∞,ℓ1)g \notin W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right).

?
Problem 11.18 from Heil C. "A Basis Theory Primer" [Hei11]More problems in Chapter 11 "Gabor Bases and Frames"

Justify the use of Fubini's Theorem in the proof of Theorem 11.18.

?
(a)

Justify the equality passing from ∫f(x)e−2πibnxg(x−ak)‾ dx\int f(x) e^{-2 \pi i b n x} \overline{g(x-a k)} \, d x to its periodized double-sum form.

(b)

Justify the equality obtained by integrating f(x)g(x−ak)‾Fk(x)f(x) \overline{g(x-a k)} F_{k}(x) periodically versus over all of R\mathbb {R}.

(c)

Justify the interchange of the sum over kk with the sum over jj and the integral.

(d)

Justify the interchange of the sum over jj with the outer integral.

This exercise gives a perturbation theorem for Gabor frames.

?
(a)

Let g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and a,b>0a, b > 0 be such that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Show that there exists a δ>0\delta > 0 such that if h∈L2(R)h \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and ∥g−h∥W(L∞,ℓ1)<δ\left\| g-h\right\|_{W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right)} < \delta, then G(h,a,b)\mathcal{G}(h, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

Does part (a) remain valid if we replace the amalgam norm ∥⋅∥W(L∞,ℓ1)\left\| \cdot \right\|_{W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right)} by the L2L^{2}-norm ∥⋅∥L2\left\| \cdot \right\|_{L^{2}}?

Prove the remaining statements in Theorem 11.31.

?
Remark.
?

Theorem 11.31: Let g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) be fixed. (a) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is complete in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if Zg≠0Z g \neq 0 a.e. (b) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is minimal in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if 1/Zg∈L2(Q)1 / Z g \in L^{2}(Q); in this case G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is exact and its biorthogonal system is G(g~,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\widetilde{g}, 1, 1) where g~∈L2(R)\widetilde{g} \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) satisfies Zg~=1/ZgZ\widetilde{g} = 1 / Z g. (c) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is a Bessel sequence in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if Zg∈L∞(R)Z g \in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}), and in this case B=∥Zg∥L∞2B = \left\| Z g\right\|_{L^{\infty }}^{2} is a Bessel bound. (d) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if there exist A,B>0A, B > 0 such that A≤∣Zg(x,ξ)∣2≤BA \leq \left|Z g(x, \xi )\right|^{2} \leq B a.e.; in this case G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is a Riesz basis and A,BA, B are frame bounds. (e) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if ∣Zg(x,ξ)∣=1\left|Z g(x, \xi )\right| = 1 a.e.

?
(a)

Let p(x)=∑k=−NNcke2πikxp(x) = \sum_{k = -N}^{N} c_{k} e^{2 \pi i k x} be a trigonometric polynomial. Show that if ∣p∣=1\left|p\right| = 1 a.e., then p(x)=cne2πinxp(x) = c_{n} e^{2 \pi i n x} for some nn between −N-N and NN.

(b)

Suppose that g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) is compactly supported. Show that G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1,1) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if ∣g∣=χE\left|g\right| = \chi_{E} for some bounded set E⊆RE \subseteq \mathbb {R} that satisfies ∑k∈ZχE(x−k)=1\sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}} \chi_{E}(x-k) = 1 a.e.

Let ϕ(x)=e−πx2\phi (x) = e^{-\pi x^{2}} be the Gaussian function. Show that G(ϕ,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\phi , 1,1) is ℓ2\ell^{2}-independent, i.e., if c=(ckn)k,n∈Z∈ℓ2(Z2)c = \left(c_{k n}\right)_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} \in \ell^{2}\left(\mathbb {Z}^{2}\right) and ∑cknMnTkϕ=0\sum c_{k n} M_{n} T_{k} \phi = 0, then ckn=0c_{k n} = 0 for every kk and nn. Note that since G(ϕ,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\phi , 1,1) is a Bessel sequence, if we let RR denote the synthesis operator for G(ϕ,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\phi , 1,1) then ℓ2\ell^{2}-independence is equivalent to the statement that R:ℓ2(Z2)→L2(R)R: \ell^{2}\left(\mathbb {Z}^{2}\right) \rightarrow L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) is injective.

?

References

[Hei11] Heil C. A Basis Theory Primer. Birkhäuser, 2011.