Gabor systems and frames
[17/100%]Given , show that is a frame for if and only if is a frame, and in this case their frame operators coincide.
Let be a Gabor frame for .
Show that the frame operator commutes with and for all , and use this to show that also commutes with and .
Show that the canonical dual frame of is the Gabor frame where .
Suppose that is a frame for . Show that is a Riesz basis if and only if .
Show that the canonical Parseval frame of a lattice Gabor frame is another lattice Gabor frame. Specifically, if is a frame for and we set , where is the frame operator, then is a Parseval frame for .
Fix and . Recall from equations (9.2) and (9.3) that the Fourier transform interchanges translation with modulation. Use this to show that
Show that is an orthonormal basis for .
Show that is a frame for if and only if .
Remark Amazingly, there is no known explicit characterization of the set of points such that is a frame for , see [Jan03].
Assume that the hypotheses of part (a) of Theorem 11.4 are satisfied, i.e., , and equation (11.3) holds. Prove the following statements about the frame .
The frame operator is pointwise multiplication by , i.e., for .
The canonical dual frame is where .
If then is a Riesz basis for .
If then is a redundant frame for .
Show that if is not the zero function, then there exist some such that is a frame for .
Let satisfy and for . Show that is a frame for for and .
Let be fixed. By Exercise 11.9, there exists a function supported in such that on .
Set and show that is infinitely differentiable, compactly supported, and satisfies everywhere.
Show that there exists a function such that is a Parseval frame for .
Fix and .
Show that is a Riesz basis for if and only if it is a frame and .
Show that is an orthonormal basis for if and only if it is a tight frame, , and .
Suppose that is a frame for . Without appealing to Theorem 11.9, show that and are Riesz sequences in .
Assuming Theorem 11.9, show that is a tight frame for if and only if is an orthogonal sequence in .
Let be the function defined in Example 11.11. Show that is an orthonormal basis for , but .
Justify the use of Fubini's Theorem in the proof of Theorem 11.18.
Justify the equality passing from to its periodized double-sum form.
Justify the equality obtained by integrating periodically versus over all of .
Justify the interchange of the sum over with the sum over and the integral.
Justify the interchange of the sum over with the outer integral.
This exercise gives a perturbation theorem for Gabor frames.
Let and be such that is a frame for . Show that there exists a such that if and , then is a frame for .
Does part (a) remain valid if we replace the amalgam norm by the -norm ?
Prove the remaining statements in Theorem 11.31.
Theorem 11.31: Let be fixed. (a) is complete in if and only if a.e. (b) is minimal in if and only if ; in this case is exact and its biorthogonal system is where satisfies . (c) is a Bessel sequence in if and only if , and in this case is a Bessel bound. (d) is a frame for if and only if there exist such that a.e.; in this case is a Riesz basis and are frame bounds. (e) is an orthonormal basis for if and only if a.e.
Let be a trigonometric polynomial. Show that if a.e., then for some between and .
Suppose that is compactly supported. Show that is an orthonormal basis for if and only if for some bounded set that satisfies a.e.
Let be the Gaussian function. Show that is -independent, i.e., if and , then for every and . Note that since is a Bessel sequence, if we let denote the synthesis operator for then -independence is equivalent to the statement that is injective.