Gabor Bases and Frames
[42/98%]Given , show that is a frame for if and only if is a frame, and in this case their frame operators coincide.
Use the fact that to show that the set of time-frequency shift operators is not closed under compositions, and hence does not form a group.
Define
and show that is a nonabelian group under composition of operators.
Define
Show that is a nonabelian group with respect to the operation
Show further that is isomorphic to .
Define
Show that is a nonabelian group with respect to multiplication of matrices, and is isomorphic to .
Show that is not a subgroup of , but the countable subset is a subgroup.
As a set, , and hence has a natural topology. In fact, is an example of a locally compact group (LCG). Every LCG has associated left and right Haar measures (and these are unique up to scalar multiples). Show that the left Haar measure for is , which means that for every we have
for every integrable function on . Show that the right Haar measure is also . Thus, even though is nonabelian, its left and Haar right measures coincide (such an LCG is said to be unimodular).
Remark The (isomorphic) groups are called the Heisenberg group. The properties of the Heisenberg group should be contrasted with those of the affine group discussed in Exercise 12.2.
Let be a Gabor frame for .
Show that the frame operator commutes with and for all , and use this to show that also commutes with and .
Show that the canonical dual frame of is the Gabor frame where .
Suppose that is a frame for . Show that is a Riesz basis if and only if .
Show that the canonical Parseval frame of a lattice Gabor frame is another lattice Gabor frame. Specifically, if is a frame for and we set , where is the frame operator, then is a Parseval frame for .
Fix and . Recall from equations (9.2) and (9.3) that the Fourier transform interchanges translation with modulation. Use this to show that
Show that is an orthonormal basis for .
Show that is a frame for if and only if .
Remark Amazingly, there is no known explicit characterization of the set of points such that is a frame for , see [Jan03].
Assume that the hypotheses of part (a) of Theorem 11.4 are satisfied, i.e., , and equation (11.3) holds. Prove the following statements about the frame .
The frame operator is pointwise multiplication by , i.e., for .
The canonical dual frame is where .
If then is a Riesz basis for .
If then is a redundant frame for .
Show that if is not the zero function, then there exist some such that is a frame for .
Let satisfy and for . Show that is a frame for for and .
This exercise will construct a compactly supported, infinitely differentiable function on the real line. Define .
Show that for every , there exists a polynomial of degree such that
Conclude that is infinitely differentiable, every derivative of is bounded, and for every and .
Show that if , then is infinitely differentiable, is zero outside of , and is strictly positive on .
Let be fixed. By Exercise 11.9, there exists a function supported in such that on .
Set and show that is infinitely differentiable, compactly supported, and satisfies everywhere.
Show that there exists a function such that is a Parseval frame for .
Fix and .
Show that is a Riesz basis for if and only if it is a frame and .
Show that is an orthonormal basis for if and only if it is a tight frame, , and .
Given , show that is a Riesz basis for its closed span with frame bounds if and only if equation (11.8) holds.
Suppose that is a frame for . Without appealing to Theorem 11.9, show that and are Riesz sequences in .
Assuming Theorem 11.9, show that is a tight frame for if and only if is an orthogonal sequence in .
Prove that is a Banach space for each , and is a closed subspace of .
Let be the function defined in Example 11.11. Show that is an orthonormal basis for , but .
Complete the proof of Theorem 11.13.
for , and is dense in for .
is closed under translations: .
is an ideal in under pointwise products: if and , then and .
, where .
Justify the use of Fubini's Theorem in the proof of Theorem 11.18.
Justify the equality passing from to its periodized double-sum form.
Justify the equality obtained by integrating periodically versus over all of .
Justify the interchange of the sum over with the sum over and the integral.
Justify the interchange of the sum over with the outer integral.
This exercise gives a perturbation theorem for Gabor frames.
Let and be such that is a frame for . Show that there exists a such that if and , then is a frame for .
Does part (a) remain valid if we replace the amalgam norm by the -norm ?
Prove that there is a unique unitary operator that satisfies equation (11.19).
Prove Theorem 11.24.
Theorem 11.24: If or , then for we have , where the equality holds pointwise everywhere on if is continuous, and almost everywhere otherwise.
If then by Theorem 11.22. Prove the following statements.
for almost every .
If is continuous, then is continuous.
is an injective mapping of into , and the range of is a proper, dense subspace of .
is unbounded.
Suppose that is such that is continuous.
Show that if is even then .
Show that if is odd then .
Show that if is real valued then for some .
Prove the remaining statements in Theorem 11.31.
Theorem 11.31: Let be fixed. (a) is complete in if and only if a.e. (b) is minimal in if and only if ; in this case is exact and its biorthogonal system is where satisfies . (c) is a Bessel sequence in if and only if , and in this case is a Bessel bound. (d) is a frame for if and only if there exist such that a.e.; in this case is a Riesz basis and are frame bounds. (e) is an orthonormal basis for if and only if a.e.
Let be a trigonometric polynomial. Show that if a.e., then for some between and .
Suppose that is compactly supported. Show that is an orthonormal basis for if and only if for some bounded set that satisfies a.e.
Let be the Gaussian function. Show that is -independent, i.e., if and , then for every and . Note that since is a Bessel sequence, if we let denote the synthesis operator for then -independence is equivalent to the statement that is injective.
Show that if and exists, then this limit must be zero.
Let be the position and momentum operators introduced in equation (11.26). These operators are not defined on all of . Instead, define domains
which are dense subspaces of . Restricted to these domains, maps into and maps into . Show that and are unbounded even when restricted to these domains, i.e.,
Let be the Schwartz space introduced in Definition 9.18. Show that the position and momentum operators map into itself, and are self-adjoint when restricted to this domain, i.e.,
for all . (The Schwartz space is a convenient dense subspace of , but can be replaced in this problem by some larger subspaces of if desired.)
The commutator of position and momentum is the operator . Show that in the sense that for all differentiable functions . How does this relate to equation (11.32)?
This exercise will give an abstract operator-theoretic version of the Uncertainty Principle.
Let be a subspace of a Hilbert space , and let be linear but possibly unbounded operators. By replacing with the smaller space domain domain if necessary, we may assume that , and are all defined on .
Show that if are self-adjoint in the sense that
then
where is the commutator of and .
Show that equality holds in part (a) if and only if for some .
Apply Exercises to the position and momentum operators and to derive the Classical Uncertainty Principle,
for .
Remark An extension by density argument can be used to prove that equation (11.33) extends to all , or integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions can be used to prove directly that equation (11.33) holds whenever is finite, see [Heil].
Modify Battle's argument to prove the Weak : If is a Riesz basis for then
where is the dual system generator from Theorem 11.31(b).
Remark It requires some work, but it can be shown that the Weak BLT implies Theorem 11.35; see [DJ93] or the survey paper [BHW95].
Show that if for are three noncollinear points in , then there exist an invertible matrix and a point such that contains those three points.
Fix , and let be any set of finitely many distinct points in . Define .
Fix . Show that is linearly independent if and only if is linearly independent.
Given , let , so multiplication by the matrix is a shear operation on . Define , and show that is linearly independent if and only if is linearly independent.
Let , so multiplication by is a counterclockwise rotation of by 90 degrees. Show that is linearly independent if and only if is linearly independent, where is the inverse Fourier transform of .
Given , let , so multiplication by is a dilation by on the -axis and a corresponding dilation by on the -axis. Define , and show that is linearly independent if and only if is linearly independent.
Show that if is a matrix with , then can be written as a product of matrices of the form , and .
Remark This factorization is related to the fact that every matrix with determinant 1 is a symplectic matrix. In contrast, not every matrix with determinant 1 is symplectic when . As a consequence, the HRT Conjecture becomes even more intractable in higher dimensions.
Assuming Theorem 11.36, prove Corollary 11.37.
Fix .
Show that if is any set of finitely many distinct real numbers, then is linearly independent.
Show that if is any set of finitely many distinct real numbers, then is linearly independent.
Show that if is any set of finitely many distinct but collinear points in , then is linearly independent.
Suppose that is supported within some halfline, either or where . Show that if is any set of finitely many distinct points in , then is linearly independent.
The th Hermite function is
where denotes the th derivative operator.
Prove that
Use equation (11.41) to show that , where is a polynomial of degree whose leading coefficient is . Consequently, each is infinitely differentiable and has exponential decay at infinity, and .
Remark It can be shown that is an orthogonal (but not orthonormal) basis for . Hence is a dense subspace of .
Let be the Gaussian function, and let where is any nontrivial polynomial. Show that if is any set of finitely many distinct points in , then is linearly independent.
Assume that and are such that is linearly independent. Show that there exists such that is independent for any set with for .
Suppose that is differentiable and . Set , and show that exists and is finite if is small enough.