Chapter 11

Gabor Bases and Frames

[42/98%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 11.1

Given g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), show that {MbnTakg}k,n∈Z\left\{ M_{b n} T_{a k} g\right\}_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if {TakMbng}k,n∈Z\left\{ T_{a k} M_{b n} g\right\}_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} is a frame, and in this case their frame operators coincide.

?
Problem 11.2
?
(a)

Use the fact that TaMb=e−2πiabMbTaT_{a} M_{b} = e^{-2 \pi i a b} M_{b} T_{a} to show that the set {TaMb}a,b∈R\left\{ T_{a} M_{b}\right\}_{a, b \in \mathbb {R}} of time-frequency shift operators is not closed under compositions, and hence does not form a group.

(b)

Define

H1={e2πitTaMb}a,b,t∈R, \mathbb {H}_{1} = \left\{ e^{2 \pi i t} T_{a} M_{b}\right\} _{a, b, t \in \mathbb {R}},

and show that H1\mathbb {H}_{1} is a nonabelian group under composition of operators.

(c)

Define

H2=R3={(a,b,t)}a,b,t∈R. \mathbb {H}_{2} = \mathbb {R}^{3} = \left\{ (a, b, t)\right\} _{a, b, t \in \mathbb {R}}.

Show that H2\mathbb {H}_{2} is a nonabelian group with respect to the operation

(a,b,t)∗(c,d,u)=(a+c,b+d,t+u+bc). (a, b, t) *(c, d, u) = (a+c, b+d, t+u+b c).

Show further that H2\mathbb {H}_{2} is isomorphic to H1\mathbb {H}_{1}.

(d)

Define

H3={[1bt01a001]}a,b,t∈R. \mathbb {H}_{3} = \left\{ \left[\begin{smallmatrix} 1 & b & t \\ 0 & 1 & a \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix}\right]\right\} _{a, b, t \in \mathbb {R}}.

Show that H3\mathbb {H}_{3} is a nonabelian group with respect to multiplication of matrices, and H3\mathbb {H}_{3} is isomorphic to H1\mathbb {H}_{1}.

(e)

Show that aZ×bZ×{0}={(ak,bn,0)}k,n∈Za \mathbb {Z} \times b \mathbb {Z} \times \left\{ 0\right\} = \left\{ (a k, b n, 0)\right\}_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} is not a subgroup of H2\mathbb {H}_{2}, but the countable subset aZ×bZ×abZ={(ak,bn,abj)}k,n,j∈Za \mathbb {Z} \times b \mathbb {Z} \times a b \mathbb {Z} = \left\{ (a k, b n, a b j)\right\}_{k, n, j \in \mathbb {Z}} is a subgroup.

(f)

As a set, H2=R3\mathbb {H}_{2} = \mathbb {R}^{3}, and hence has a natural topology. In fact, H2\mathbb {H}_{2} is an example of a locally compact group (LCG). Every LCG has associated left and right Haar measures (and these are unique up to scalar multiples). Show that the left Haar measure for H2\mathbb {H}_{2} is dadbdtd a d b d t, which means that for every (c,d,u)∈H2(c, d, u) \in \mathbb {H}_{2} we have

∭F((c,d,u)∗(a,b,t))dadbdt=∭F(a,b,t)dadbdt \iiint F((c, d, u) *(a, b, t)) d a d b d t = \iiint F(a, b, t) d a d b d t

for every integrable function FF on H2=R3\mathbb {H}_{2} = \mathbb {R}^{3}. Show that the right Haar measure is also dadbdtd a d b d t. Thus, even though H2\mathbb {H}_{2} is nonabelian, its left and Haar right measures coincide (such an LCG is said to be unimodular).

Remark The (isomorphic) groups H1,H2,H3\mathbb {H}_{1}, \mathbb {H}_{2}, \mathbb {H}_{3} are called the Heisenberg group. The properties of the Heisenberg group should be contrasted with those of the affine group discussed in Exercise 12.2.

Problem 11.3

Let G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) be a Gabor frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?
(a)

Show that the frame operator SS commutes with MbnM_{b n} and TakT_{a k} for all k,n∈Zk, n \in \mathbb {Z}, and use this to show that S−1S^{-1} also commutes with MbnM_{b n} and TakT_{a k}.

(b)

Show that the canonical dual frame of G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is the Gabor frame G(g~,a,b)\mathcal{G}(\widetilde{g}, a, b) where g~=S−1g\widetilde{g} = S^{-1} g.

(c)

Suppose that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Riesz basis if and only if ⟨g,g~⟩=1\left\langle g, \widetilde{g} \right\rangle = 1.

(d)

Show that the canonical Parseval frame of a lattice Gabor frame is another lattice Gabor frame. Specifically, if G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and we set g♯=S−1/2gg^{\sharp } = S^{-1 / 2} g, where SS is the frame operator, then G(g♯,a,b)\mathcal{G}\left(g^{\sharp }, a, b\right) is a Parseval frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Problem 11.4

Fix g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and a,b>0a, b > 0. Recall from equations (9.2) and (9.3) that the Fourier transform interchanges translation with modulation. Use this to show that

G(g,a,b) is a frame ⟺G(g^,b,a) is a frame.  \mathcal{G}(g, a, b) \text{ is a frame } \Longleftrightarrow \mathcal{G}(\widehat{g}, b, a) \text{ is a frame. }
?
Problem 11.5
?
(a)

Show that G(χ[0,1],1,1)\mathcal{G}\left(\chi_{[0,1]}, 1,1\right) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

Show that G(χ[0,1],a,1)\mathcal{G}\left(\chi_{[0,1]}, a, 1\right) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if 0<a≤10 < a \leq 1.

Remark Amazingly, there is no known explicit characterization of the set of points (a,b)(a, b) such that G(χ[0,1],a,b)\mathcal{G}\left(\chi_{[0,1]}, a, b\right) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), see [Jan03].

Problem 11.6

Assume that the hypotheses of part (a) of Theorem 11.4 are satisfied, i.e., 0<ab≤1,supp⁡(g)⊆[0,b−1]0 < a b \leq 1, \operatorname {supp}\left(g\right) \subseteq \left[0, b^{-1}\right], and equation (11.3) holds. Prove the following statements about the frame G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b).

?
(a)

The frame operator is pointwise multiplication by b−1G0b^{-1} G_{0}, i.e., Sf=b−1G0fS f = b^{-1} G_{0} f for f∈L2(R)f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

The canonical dual frame is G(g~,a,b)\mathcal{G}(\widetilde{g}, a, b) where g~=bg/G0\widetilde{g} = b g / G_{0}.

(c)

If ab=1a b = 1 then G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Riesz basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(d)

If 0<ab<10 < a b < 1 then G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a redundant frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Problem 11.7

Show that if g∈Cc(R)g \in C_{c}(\mathbb {R}) is not the zero function, then there exist some a,b>0a, b > 0 such that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?
Problem 11.8

Let g∈Cc(R)g \in C_{c}(\mathbb {R}) satisfy supp⁡(g)=[0,b0−1]\operatorname {supp}\left(g\right) = \left[0, b_{0}^{-1}\right] and g(x)>0g(x) > 0 for x∈(0,b0−1)x \in \left(0, b_{0}^{-1}\right). Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) for 0<a<b0−10 < a < b_{0}^{-1} and 0<b<b00 < b < b_{0}.

?
Problem 11.9

This exercise will construct a compactly supported, infinitely differentiable function on the real line. Define f(x)=e−1/x2χ(0,∞)(x)f(x) = e^{-1 / x^{2}} \chi_{(0, \infty )}(x).

?
(a)

Show that for every n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}, there exists a polynomial pnp_{n} of degree 3n3 n such that

f(n)(x)=pn(x−1)e−x−2χ(0,∞)(x) f^{(n)}(x) = p_{n}\left(x^{-1}\right) e^{-x^{-2}} \chi _{(0, \infty )}(x)

Conclude that ff is infinitely differentiable, every derivative of ff is bounded, and f(n)(x)=0f^{(n)}(x) = 0 for every x≤0x \leq 0 and n≥0n \geq 0.

(b)

Show that if a<ba < b, then g(x)=f(x−a)f(b−x)g(x) = f(x-a) f(b-x) is infinitely differentiable, is zero outside of (a,b)(a, b), and is strictly positive on (a,b)(a, b).

Problem 11.10

Let 0<ab<10 < a b < 1 be fixed. By Exercise 11.9, there exists a function f∈Cc∞(R)f \in C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}) supported in [0,b−1]\left[0, b^{-1}\right] such that f>0f > 0 on (0,b−1)\left(0, b^{-1}\right).

?
(a)

Set F0(x)=∑k∈Z∣f(x−ak)∣2F_{0}(x) = \sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}}\left|f(x-a k)\right|^{2} and show that g=f/F01/2g = f / F_{0}^{1 / 2} is infinitely differentiable, compactly supported, and satisfies ∑k∈Z∣g(x−ak)∣2=1\sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}}\left|g(x-a k)\right|^{2} = 1 everywhere.

(b)

Show that there exists a function g∈Cc∞(R)g \in C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}) such that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Parseval frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Problem 11.11

Fix g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and a,b>0a, b > 0.

?
(a)

Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a Riesz basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if it is a frame and ab=1a b = 1.

(b)

Show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if it is a tight frame, ab=1a b = 1, and ∥g∥L2=1\left\| g\right\|_{L^{2}} = 1.

Problem 11.12

Given g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), show that T(g)={Tkg}k∈Z\mathcal{T}(g) = \left\{ T_{k} g\right\}_{k \in \mathbb {Z}} is a Riesz basis for its closed span with frame bounds A,BA, B if and only if equation (11.8) holds.

?
Problem 11.13

Suppose that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Without appealing to Theorem 11.9, show that {Mk/ag^}n∈Z\left\{ M_{k / a} \widehat{g}\right\}_{n \in \mathbb {Z}} and {Mn/bg^}n∈Z\left\{ M_{n / b} \widehat{g}\right\}_{n \in \mathbb {Z}} are Riesz sequences in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?
Problem 11.14

Assuming Theorem 11.9, show that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a tight frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if G(g,1/b,1/a)\mathcal{G}(g, 1 / b, 1 / a) is an orthogonal sequence in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

?
Problem 11.15

Prove that W(Lp,ℓq)W\left(L^{p}, \ell^{q}\right) is a Banach space for each p,qp, q, and W(C,ℓq)W\left(C, \ell^{q}\right) is a closed subspace of W(L∞,ℓq)W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{q}\right).

?
Problem 11.16

Let gg be the function defined in Example 11.11. Show that G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1,1) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), but g∉W(L∞,ℓ1)g \notin W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right).

?
Problem 11.17

Complete the proof of Theorem 11.13.

?
(a)

W(L∞,ℓ1)⊆Lp(R)W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right) \subseteq L^{p}(\mathbb {R}) for 1≤p≤∞1 \leq p \leq \infty, and W(L∞,ℓ1)W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right) is dense in Lp(R)L^{p}(\mathbb {R}) for 1≤p<∞1 \leq p < \infty.

(b)

W(L∞,ℓ1)W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right) is closed under translations: ∥Tbf∥W(L∞,ℓ1)≤2∥f∥W(L∞,ℓ1)\left\| T_{b} f\right\|_{W(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1})} \leq 2\left\| f\right\|_{W(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1})}.

(c)

W(L∞,ℓ1)W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right) is an ideal in L∞(R)L^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}) under pointwise products: if f∈L∞(R)f \in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}) and g∈W(L∞,ℓ1)g \in W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right), then fg∈W(L∞,ℓ1)f g \in W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right) and ∥fg∥W(L∞,ℓ1)≤∥f∥L∞∥g∥W(L∞,ℓ1)\left\| f g\right\|_{W(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1})} \leq \left\| f\right\|_{L^{\infty }}\left\| g\right\|_{W(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1})}.

(d)

1C1/a∣∣∣f∣∣∣a≤∥f∥W(L∞,ℓ1)\displaystyle \frac{1}{C_{1/a}}\lvert \lvert \lvert f\rvert \rvert \rvert_{a} \leq \left\| f\right\|_{W(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1})}, where ∣∣∣f∣∣∣a=∑k∈Z∥f⋅χ[ak,a(k+1)]∥L∞\lvert \lvert \lvert f\rvert \rvert \rvert_{a} = \sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}}\left\| f \cdot \chi_{[a k, a(k+1)]}\right\|_{L^{\infty }}.

Problem 11.18

Justify the use of Fubini's Theorem in the proof of Theorem 11.18.

?
(a)

Justify the equality passing from ∫f(x)e−2πibnxg(x−ak)‾ dx\int f(x) e^{-2 \pi i b n x} \overline{g(x-a k)} \, d x to its periodized double-sum form.

(b)

Justify the equality obtained by integrating f(x)g(x−ak)‾Fk(x)f(x) \overline{g(x-a k)} F_{k}(x) periodically versus over all of R\mathbb {R}.

(c)

Justify the interchange of the sum over kk with the sum over jj and the integral.

(d)

Justify the interchange of the sum over jj with the outer integral.

Problem 11.19

This exercise gives a perturbation theorem for Gabor frames.

?
(a)

Let g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and a,b>0a, b > 0 be such that G(g,a,b)\mathcal{G}(g, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Show that there exists a δ>0\delta > 0 such that if h∈L2(R)h \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and ∥g−h∥W(L∞,ℓ1)<δ\left\| g-h\right\|_{W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right)} < \delta, then G(h,a,b)\mathcal{G}(h, a, b) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

(b)

Does part (a) remain valid if we replace the amalgam norm ∥⋅∥W(L∞,ℓ1)\left\| \cdot \right\|_{W\left(L^{\infty }, \ell^{1}\right)} by the L2L^{2}-norm ∥⋅∥L2\left\| \cdot \right\|_{L^{2}}?

Problem 11.20

Prove that there is a unique unitary operator that satisfies equation (11.19).

?
Problem 11.21

Prove Theorem 11.24.

?
Remark.
?

Theorem 11.24: If f∈L2(R)f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) or f∈W(Lp,ℓ1)f \in W(L^{p}, \ell^{1}), then for m,n∈Zm, n \in \mathbb {Z} we have Zf(x+m,ξ+n)=e2πimξZf(x,ξ)Z f(x+m, \xi +n) = e^{2 \pi i m \xi } Z f(x, \xi ), where the equality holds pointwise everywhere on R2\mathbb {R}^{2} if ZfZ f is continuous, and almost everywhere otherwise.

Problem 11.22

If f∈L1(R)f \in L^{1}(\mathbb {R}) then Zf∈W(L1,ℓ1)=L1(Q)Z f \in W\left(L^{1}, \ell^{1}\right) = L^{1}(Q) by Theorem 11.22. Prove the following statements.

?
(a)

f(x)=∫01Zf(x,ξ)dξf(x) = \int_{0}^{1} Z f(x, \xi ) d \xi for almost every x∈Rx \in \mathbb {R}.

(b)

If ZfZ f is continuous, then ff is continuous.

(c)

ZZ is an injective mapping of L1(R)L^{1}(\mathbb {R}) into L1(Q)L^{1}(Q), and the range of Z:L1(R)→L1(Q)Z: L^{1}(\mathbb {R}) \rightarrow L^{1}(Q) is a proper, dense subspace of L1(Q)L^{1}(Q).

(d)

Z−1:L1(Q)→L1(R)Z^{-1}: L^{1}(Q) \rightarrow L^{1}(\mathbb {R}) is unbounded.

Problem 11.23

Suppose that f∈L2(R)f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) is such that ZfZ f is continuous.

?
(a)

Show that if ff is even then Zf⁡(1/2,1/2)=0\operatorname {Zf}(1 / 2,1 / 2) = 0.

(b)

Show that if ff is odd then Zf(0,0)=Zf(0,1/2)=Zf(1/2,0)=0Z f(0,0) = Z f(0,1 / 2) = Z f(1 / 2,0) = 0.

(c)

Show that if ff is real valued then Zf(x,1/2)=0Z f(x, 1 / 2) = 0 for some x∈[0,1]x \in [0,1].

Problem 11.24

Prove the remaining statements in Theorem 11.31.

?
Remark.
?

Theorem 11.31: Let g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) be fixed. (a) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is complete in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if Zg≠0Z g \neq 0 a.e. (b) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is minimal in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if 1/Zg∈L2(Q)1 / Z g \in L^{2}(Q); in this case G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is exact and its biorthogonal system is G(g~,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\widetilde{g}, 1, 1) where g~∈L2(R)\widetilde{g} \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) satisfies Zg~=1/ZgZ\widetilde{g} = 1 / Z g. (c) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is a Bessel sequence in L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if Zg∈L∞(R)Z g \in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}), and in this case B=∥Zg∥L∞2B = \left\| Z g\right\|_{L^{\infty }}^{2} is a Bessel bound. (d) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is a frame for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if there exist A,B>0A, B > 0 such that A≤∣Zg(x,ξ)∣2≤BA \leq \left|Z g(x, \xi )\right|^{2} \leq B a.e.; in this case G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is a Riesz basis and A,BA, B are frame bounds. (e) G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1, 1) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if ∣Zg(x,ξ)∣=1\left|Z g(x, \xi )\right| = 1 a.e.

Problem 11.25
?
(a)

Let p(x)=∑k=−NNcke2πikxp(x) = \sum_{k = -N}^{N} c_{k} e^{2 \pi i k x} be a trigonometric polynomial. Show that if ∣p∣=1\left|p\right| = 1 a.e., then p(x)=cne2πinxp(x) = c_{n} e^{2 \pi i n x} for some nn between −N-N and NN.

(b)

Suppose that g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) is compactly supported. Show that G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1,1) is an orthonormal basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if and only if ∣g∣=χE\left|g\right| = \chi_{E} for some bounded set E⊆RE \subseteq \mathbb {R} that satisfies ∑k∈ZχE(x−k)=1\sum_{k \in \mathbb {Z}} \chi_{E}(x-k) = 1 a.e.

Problem 11.26

Let ϕ(x)=e−πx2\phi (x) = e^{-\pi x^{2}} be the Gaussian function. Show that G(ϕ,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\phi , 1,1) is ℓ2\ell^{2}-independent, i.e., if c=(ckn)k,n∈Z∈ℓ2(Z2)c = \left(c_{k n}\right)_{k, n \in \mathbb {Z}} \in \ell^{2}\left(\mathbb {Z}^{2}\right) and ∑cknMnTkϕ=0\sum c_{k n} M_{n} T_{k} \phi = 0, then ckn=0c_{k n} = 0 for every kk and nn. Note that since G(ϕ,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\phi , 1,1) is a Bessel sequence, if we let RR denote the synthesis operator for G(ϕ,1,1)\mathcal{G}(\phi , 1,1) then ℓ2\ell^{2}-independence is equivalent to the statement that R:ℓ2(Z2)→L2(R)R: \ell^{2}\left(\mathbb {Z}^{2}\right) \rightarrow L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) is injective.

?
Problem 11.27

Show that if g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and lim⁡x→∞x∣g(x)∣2\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty } x\left|g(x)\right|^{2} exists, then this limit must be zero.

?
Problem 11.28

Let P,MP, M be the position and momentum operators introduced in equation (11.26). These operators are not defined on all of L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Instead, define domains

DP={f∈L2(R):xf(x)∈L2(R)},DM={f∈L2(R):f is differentiable and f′∈L2(R)}, \begin{aligned} D_{P} & = \left\{ f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}): x f(x) \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R})\right\} , \\ D_{M} & = \left\{ f \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}): f \text{ is differentiable and } f^{\prime } \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R})\right\} , \end{aligned}

which are dense subspaces of L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Restricted to these domains, PP maps DPD_{P} into L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and MM maps DMD_{M} into L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Show that PP and MM are unbounded even when restricted to these domains, i.e.,

sup⁡f∈DP,∥f∥L2=1∥Pf∥L2=∞=sup⁡f∈DM,∥f∥L2=1∥Mf∥L2 \sup _{\substack {f \in D_{P},\left\| f\right\| _{L^{2}} = 1}}\left\| P f\right\| _{L^{2}} = \infty = \sup _{\substack {f \in D_{M},\left\| f\right\| _{L^{2}} = 1}}\left\| M f\right\| _{L^{2}}
?
Problem 11.29

Let S(R)\mathcal{S}(\mathbb {R}) be the Schwartz space introduced in Definition 9.18. Show that the position and momentum operators map S(R)\mathcal{S}(\mathbb {R}) into itself, and are self-adjoint when restricted to this domain, i.e.,

⟨Pf,g⟩=⟨f,Pg⟩ and ⟨Mf,g⟩=⟨f,Mg⟩ \left\langle P f, g \right\rangle = \left\langle f, P g \right\rangle \quad \text{ and } \quad \left\langle M f, g \right\rangle = \left\langle f, M g \right\rangle

for all f∈S(R)f \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb {R}). (The Schwartz space is a convenient dense subspace of L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), but can be replaced in this problem by some larger subspaces of L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) if desired.)

?
Problem 11.30

The commutator of position and momentum is the operator [P,M]=PM−MP[P, M] = P M-M P. Show that [P,M]=−12πiI[P, M] = -\frac{1}{2 \pi i} I in the sense that [P,M]f=−12πif[P, M] f = -\frac{1}{2 \pi i} f for all differentiable functions ff. How does this relate to equation (11.32)?

?
Problem 11.31

This exercise will give an abstract operator-theoretic version of the Uncertainty Principle.

Let SS be a subspace of a Hilbert space HH, and let A,B:S→HA, B: S \rightarrow H be linear but possibly unbounded operators. By replacing SS with the smaller space domain (AB)∩(A B) \cap domain (BA)(B A) if necessary, we may assume that A,B,ABA, B, A B, and BAB A are all defined on SS.

?
(a)

Show that if A,BA, B are self-adjoint in the sense that

∀f,g∈S,⟨Af,g⟩=⟨f,Ag⟩ and ⟨Bf,g⟩=⟨f,Bg⟩, \forall f, g \in S, \quad \left\langle A f, g \right\rangle = \left\langle f, A g \right\rangle \quad \text{ and } \quad \left\langle B f, g \right\rangle = \left\langle f, B g \right\rangle ,

then

∀f∈S,∥Af∥∥Bf∥≥12∣⟨[A,B]f,f⟩∣, \forall f \in S, \quad \left\| A f\right\| \left\| B f\right\| \geq \frac{1}{2}\left| \left\langle [A, B] f, f \right\rangle \right|,

where [A,B]=AB−BA[A, B] = A B-B A is the commutator of AA and BB.

(b)

Show that equality holds in part (a) if and only if Af=icBfA f = i c B f for some c∈Rc \in \mathbb {R}.

Problem 11.32

Apply Exercises 11.29−11.3111.29-11.31 to the position and momentum operators PP and MM to derive the Classical Uncertainty Principle,

∥xg(x)∥L2∥ξg^(ξ)∥L2≥14π∥g∥L22,(11.33) \left\| x g(x)\right\| _{L^{2}}\left\| \xi \widehat{g}(\xi )\right\| _{L^{2}} \geq \frac{1}{4 \pi }\left\| g\right\| _{L^{2}}^{2}, \tag {11.33}

for g∈S(R)g \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb {R}).

Remark An extension by density argument can be used to prove that equation (11.33) extends to all g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}), or integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions can be used to prove directly that equation (11.33) holds whenever ∥xg(x)∥L2∥ξg^(ξ)∥L2\left\| x g(x)\right\|_{L^{2}}\left\| \xi \widehat{g}(\xi )\right\|_{L^{2}} is finite, see [Heil].

?
Problem 11.33

Modify Battle's argument to prove the Weak BLTB L T : If G(g,1,1)\mathcal{G}(g, 1,1) is a Riesz basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) then

∥xg(x)∥L2∥ξg^(ξ)∥L2∥xg~(x)∥L2∥ξg~^(ξ)∥L2=∞, \left\| x g(x)\right\| _{L^{2}}\left\| \xi \widehat{g}(\xi )\right\| _{L^{2}}\left\| x \widetilde{g}(x)\right\| _{L^{2}}\left\| \xi \widehat{\widetilde{g}}(\xi )\right\| _{L^{2}} = \infty ,

where g~\widetilde{g} is the dual system generator from Theorem 11.31(b).

Remark It requires some work, but it can be shown that the Weak BLT implies Theorem 11.35; see [DJ93] or the survey paper [BHW95].

?
Problem 11.34

Show that if (pi,qi)\left(p_{i}, q_{i}\right) for i=1,2,3i = 1,2,3 are three noncollinear points in R2\mathbb {R}^{2}, then there exist an invertible 2×22 \times 2 matrix AA and a point z∈R2z \in \mathbb {R}^{2} such that Λ=A(Z2)+z\Lambda = A\left(\mathbb {Z}^{2}\right)+z contains those three points.

?
Problem 11.35

Fix g∈L2(R)\{0}g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) \backslash \left\{ 0\right\}, and let Λ={(pk,qk)}k=1N\Lambda = \left\{ \left(p_{k}, q_{k}\right)\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} be any set of finitely many distinct points in R2\mathbb {R}^{2}. Define G(g,Λ)={MqkTpkg}k=1N\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) = \left\{ M_{q_{k}} T_{p_{k}} g\right\}_{k = 1}^{N}.

?
(a)

Fix z∈R2z \in \mathbb {R}^{2}. Show that G(g,Λ)\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) is linearly independent if and only if G(g,Λ+z)\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda +z) is linearly independent.

(b)

Given r∈Rr \in \mathbb {R}, let Sr=[10r1]S_{r} = \left[\begin{array}{ll}1 & 0 \\ r & 1\end{array}\right], so multiplication by the matrix SrS_{r} is a shear operation on R2\mathbb {R}^{2}. Define h(x)=eπirx2g(x)h(x) = e^{\pi i r x^{2}} g(x), and show that G(g,Λ)\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) is linearly independent if and only if G(h,Sr(Λ))\mathcal{G}\left(h, S_{r}(\Lambda )\right) is linearly independent.

(c)

Let R=[0−110]R = \left[\begin{array}{cc}0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0\end{array}\right], so multiplication by RR is a counterclockwise rotation of R2\mathbb {R}^{2} by 90 degrees. Show that G(g,Λ)\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) is linearly independent if and only if G(g∨,R(Λ))\mathcal{G}(\stackrel{\vee }{g}, R(\Lambda )) is linearly independent, where g∨\stackrel{\vee }{g} is the inverse Fourier transform of gg.

(d)

Given a≠0a \neq 0, let Da=[a001/a]D_{a} = \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & 0 \\ 0 & 1 / a\end{array}\right], so multiplication by DaD_{a} is a dilation by aa on the x1x_{1}-axis and a corresponding dilation by 1/a1 / a on the x2x_{2}-axis. Define h(x)=g(x/a)h(x) = g(x / a), and show that G(g,Λ)\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) is linearly independent if and only if G(h,Da(Λ))\mathcal{G}\left(h, D_{a}(\Lambda )\right) is linearly independent.

(e)

Show that if AA is a 2×22 \times 2 matrix with det⁡(A)=1\operatorname {det}(A) = 1, then AA can be written as a product of matrices of the form Sr,RS_{r}, R, and DaD_{a}.

Remark This factorization is related to the fact that every 2×22 \times 2 matrix with determinant 1 is a symplectic matrix. In contrast, not every 2d×2d2 d \times 2 d matrix with determinant 1 is symplectic when d>1d > 1. As a consequence, the HRT Conjecture becomes even more intractable in higher dimensions.

Problem 11.36

Assuming Theorem 11.36, prove Corollary 11.37.

?
Problem 11.37

Fix g∈L2(R)\{0}g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) \backslash \left\{ 0\right\}.

?
(a)

Show that if {qk}k=1N\left\{ q_{k}\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is any set of finitely many distinct real numbers, then {Mqkg}k=1N\left\{ M_{q_{k}} g\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is linearly independent.

(b)

Show that if {pk}k=1N\left\{ p_{k}\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is any set of finitely many distinct real numbers, then {Tpkg}k=1N\left\{ T_{p_{k}} g\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is linearly independent.

(c)

Show that if Λ={(pk,qk)}k=1N\Lambda = \left\{ \left(p_{k}, q_{k}\right)\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is any set of finitely many distinct but collinear points in R2\mathbb {R}^{2}, then G(g,Λ)={MqkTpkg}k=1N\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) = \left\{ M_{q_{k}} T_{p_{k}} g\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is linearly independent.

Problem 11.38

Suppose that g∈L2(R)\{0}g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) \backslash \left\{ 0\right\} is supported within some halfline, either (−∞,a](-\infty , a] or [a,∞)[a, \infty ) where a∈Ra \in \mathbb {R}. Show that if Λ={(pk,qk)}k=1N\Lambda = \left\{ \left(p_{k}, q_{k}\right)\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is any set of finitely many distinct points in R2\mathbb {R}^{2}, then G(g,Λ)={MqkTpkg}k=1N\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) = \left\{ M_{q_{k}} T_{p_{k}} g\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is linearly independent.

?
Problem 11.39

The nnth Hermite function HnH_{n} is

Hn(x)=eπx2Dne−2πx2,n≥0 H_{n}(x) = e^{\pi x^{2}} D^{n} e^{-2 \pi x^{2}}, \quad n \geq 0

where DnD^{n} denotes the nnth derivative operator.

?
(a)

Prove that

Hn+1(x)=Hn′(x)−2πxHn(x),n≥0.(11.41) H_{n+1}(x) = H_{n}^{\prime }(x)-2 \pi x H_{n}(x), \quad n \geq 0. \tag {11.41}
(b)

Use equation (11.41) to show that Hn(x)=pn(x)e−πx2H_{n}(x) = p_{n}(x) e^{-\pi x^{2}}, where pnp_{n} is a polynomial of degree nn whose leading coefficient is (−4π)n(-4 \pi )^{n}. Consequently, each HnH_{n} is infinitely differentiable and has exponential decay at infinity, and span⁡{Hn}n≥0={p(x)e−πx2:p is a polynomial}\operatorname {span}\left\{ H_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 0} = \left\{ p(x) e^{-\pi x^{2}}: p \text{ is a polynomial}\right\}.

Remark It can be shown that {Hn}n≥0\left\{ H_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 0} is an orthogonal (but not orthonormal) basis for L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}). Hence span⁡{Hn}n≥0\operatorname {span}\left\{ H_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 0} is a dense subspace of L2(R)L^{2}(\mathbb {R}).

Problem 11.40

Let ϕ(x)=e−πx2\phi (x) = e^{-\pi x^{2}} be the Gaussian function, and let h(x)=p(x)e−πx2h(x) = p(x) e^{-\pi x^{2}} where pp is any nontrivial polynomial. Show that if Λ={(pk,qk)}k=1N\Lambda = \left\{ \left(p_{k}, q_{k}\right)\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is any set of finitely many distinct points in R2\mathbb {R}^{2}, then G(h,Λ)={MqkTpkh}k=1N\mathcal{G}(h, \Lambda ) = \left\{ M_{q_{k}} T_{p_{k}} h\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} is linearly independent.

?
Problem 11.41

Assume that g∈L2(R)g \in L^{2}(\mathbb {R}) and Λ={(pk,qk)}k=1N\Lambda = \left\{ \left(p_{k}, q_{k}\right)\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} are such that G(g,Λ)\mathcal{G}(g, \Lambda ) is linearly independent. Show that there exists ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that G(g,Λ′)\mathcal{G}\left(g, \Lambda^{\prime }\right) is independent for any set Λ′={(αk′,βk′)}k=1N\Lambda^{\prime } = \left\{ \left(\alpha_{k}^{\prime }, \beta_{k}^{\prime }\right)\right\}_{k = 1}^{N} with ∣αk−αk′∣,∣βk−βk′∣<ε\left|\alpha_{k}-\alpha_{k}^{\prime }\right|,\left|\beta_{k}-\beta_{k}^{\prime }\right| < \varepsilon for k=1,…,Nk = 1, \ldots , N.

?
Problem 11.42

Suppose that mm is differentiable and m(0)=0m(0) = 0. Set p(x)=ln⁡∣m(x)∣p(x) = \ln \left|m(x)\right|, and show that ∫−δδp(x)dx\int_{-\delta }^{\delta } p(x) d x exists and is finite if δ>0\delta > 0 is small enough.

?