Resolvent identities, analyticity and resolvent bounds

[16/56%]
Show
LaTeX

Suppose TT is a bounded operator on a complex nonzero Banach space VV.

?
(a)

Prove that the function

α↦φ((T−αI)−1f) \alpha \mapsto \varphi \left((T-\alpha I)^{-1} f\right)

is analytic on C\sp⁡(T)\mathbb {C} \backslash \operatorname {sp}(T) for every f∈Vf \in V and every φ∈V′\varphi \in V^{\prime }.

(b)

Prove that sp⁡(T)≠∅\operatorname {sp}(T) \neq \varnothing.

Let A∈L(X)A \in \mathcal{L}(X). Prove that for ∣λ∣>∥A∥\left|\lambda \right| > \left\| A\right\| the inequality ∥Rλ(A)∥≤(∣λ∣−∥A∥)−1\left\| R_{\lambda }(A)\right\| \leq (\left|\lambda \right|- \left\| A\right\| )^{-1} holds.

?

Let XX be a Banach space, A∈L(X),λ∈ρ(A)A \in \mathcal{L}(X), \lambda \in \rho (A). Prove that AA and Rλ(A)R_{\lambda }(A) commute.

?

Let XX be a Banach space, A,B∈L(X)A, B \in \mathcal{L}(X). Prove that for all λ∈ρ(A)∩ρ(B)\lambda \in \rho (A) \cap \rho (B) the following identity holds:

(A−λI)−1−(B−λI)−1=(A−λI)−1(B−A)(B−λI)−1. (A-\lambda I)^{-1}-(B-\lambda I)^{-1} = (A-\lambda I)^{-1}(B-A)(B-\lambda I)^{-1}.
?

Let AA be a self-adjoint compact operator in a Hilbert space H,A=∑n=1∞λn(⋅,φn)φnH, A = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty } \lambda_{n}\left(\cdot , \varphi_{n}\right) \varphi_{n} be its Schmidt expansion. Prove that

?
(1)

∀k≥1:Akx=∑n=1∞λnk(x,φn)φn,x∈H\forall k \geq 1: A^{k} x = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty } \lambda_{n}^{k}\left(x, \varphi_{n}\right) \varphi_{n}, x \in H;

(2)

∀λ∈C\{0,λn,n≥1}\forall \lambda \in \mathbb {C} \backslash \left\{ 0, \lambda_{n}, n \geq 1\right\} :

Rλ(A)y=∑n=1∞(y,φn)λn−λφn−1λPy=1λ(∑n=1∞λn(y,φn)λn−λφn−y),y∈H R_{\lambda }(A) y = \sum _{n = 1}^{\infty } \frac{\left(y, \varphi _{n}\right)}{\lambda _{n}-\lambda } \varphi _{n}-\frac{1}{\lambda } P y = \frac{1}{\lambda }\left(\sum _{n = 1}^{\infty } \frac{\lambda _{n}\left(y, \varphi _{n}\right)}{\lambda _{n}-\lambda } \varphi _{n}-y\right), y \in H

where PP is the orthogonal projector onto Ker⁡A\operatorname {Ker} A.

© Let λ,μ∈ρ(A)\lambda , \mu \in \rho (A). Prove the Hilbert resolvent identity:

Rλ(A)−Rμ(A)=(λ−μ)Rλ(A)Rμ(A). R_{\lambda }(A)-R_{\mu }(A) = (\lambda -\mu ) R_{\lambda }(A) R_{\mu }(A).

Using this identity, prove that

Rλ(A)Rμ(A)=Rμ(A)Rλ(A) R_{\lambda }(A) R_{\mu }(A) = R_{\mu }(A) R_{\lambda }(A)
?

Let λ0,λ∈ρ(A)\lambda_{0}, \lambda \in \rho (A). Prove that if ∣λ−λ0∣<1∥Rλ0(A)∥\left|\lambda -\lambda_{0}\right| < \frac{1}{\left\| R_{\lambda_{0}}(A)\right\| }, then

∥Rλ(A)−Rλ0(A)∥⩽∣λ−λ0∣⋅∥Rλ02(A)∥1−∣λ−λ0∣⋅∥Rλ0(A)∥ \left\| R_{\lambda }(A)-R_{\lambda _{0}}(A)\right\| \leqslant \frac{\left|\lambda -\lambda _{0}\right| \cdot \left\| R_{\lambda _{0}}^{2}(A)\right\| }{1-\left|\lambda -\lambda _{0}\right| \cdot \left\| R_{\lambda _{0}}(A)\right\| }
?

Prove that Rλ(A)R_{\lambda }(A) is

?
(a)

a continuous;

(b)

an analytic function of the variable λ\lambda on the domain ρ(A)∪{∞}\rho (A) \cup \left\{ \infty \right\} with values in B(X)\mathcal{B}(X). Prove that if λ0∈ρ(A)\lambda_{0} \in \rho (A), then for ∣λ−λ0∣<1∥Rλ0(A)∥\left|\lambda -\lambda_{0}\right| < \frac{1}{\left\| R_{\lambda_{0}}(A)\right\| } the resolvent admits the representation

Rλ(A)=∑k=0∞(λ−λ0)k(Rλ0(A))k+1 R_{\lambda }(A) = \sum _{k = 0}^{\infty }\left(\lambda -\lambda _{0}\right)^{k}\left(R_{\lambda _{0}}(A)\right)^{k+1}

and for ∣λ∣>r(A)\left|\lambda \right| > r(A)

Rλ(A)=−1λ∑n=1∞Anλn R_{\lambda }(A) = -\frac{1}{\lambda } \sum _{n = 1}^{\infty } \frac{A^{n}}{\lambda ^{n}}

Let XX be a normed space, A,B∈B(X)A, B \in \mathcal{B}(X). Prove that if AA and BB commute, then Rλ(A)R_{\lambda }(A) commutes with BB for all λ∈ρ(A)\lambda \in \rho (A). Prove that if BB and Rλ(A)R_{\lambda }(A) commute for some λ∈ρ(A)\lambda \in \rho (A), then AA and BB commute.

?

The resolvent of every operator is analytic at each point of its domain, and at ∞\infty; its value at ∞\infty is (the operator) 00.

?
Remark.
?

Suppose that AA is an operator on a Hilbert space H\mathbf{H}. If λ\lambda does not belong to the spectrum of AA, then the operator A−λA - \lambda is invertible; write ρ(λ)=(A−λ)−1\rho (\lambda ) = (A-\lambda )^{-1}. (When it is necessary to indicate the dependence of the function ρ\rho on the operator AA, write ρ=ρA\rho = \rho_A.) The function ρ\rho is called the resolvent of AA. The domain of ρ\rho is the complement of spec⁡A\operatorname {spec} A; its values are operators on H\mathbf{H}.

Consider, quite generally, functions φ\varphi whose domains are open sets in the complex plane and whose values are operators on H\mathbf{H}. Such a function φ\varphi is called analytic if, for each ff and gg in H\mathbf{H}, the numerical function λ↦⟨φ(λ)f,g⟩\lambda \mapsto \left\langle \varphi (\lambda )f, g \right\rangle (with the same domain as φ\varphi) is analytic in the usual sense. (This concept is sometimes called weak analyticity.) In case the function ψ\psi defined by ψ(λ)=φ(1/λ)\psi (\lambda ) = \varphi (1/\lambda ) can be assigned a value at the origin so that it becomes analytic there, then (just as for numerical functions) φ\varphi is called analytic at ∞\infty, and φ\varphi is assigned at ∞\infty the value of ψ\psi at 00.

Compute explicitly the resolvent of the Volterra operator in Problem 641.

?

Suppose that AA is a bounded selfadjoint operator with spectral measure λ\lambda. Prove the equality

s-lim⁡ε→0επ∫ab[(a−λ)2+ε21]−1 dλ=12λ({a})+λ((a,b))+12λ({b})=12λ([a,b])+12λ((a,b)). \operatorname {s-lim}_{\varepsilon \to 0}\frac\varepsilon \pi \int _a^b[(a-\lambda )^2+\varepsilon ^21]^{-1}\, d\lambda =\frac12\lambda \left(\left\{ a\right\} \right)+\lambda \left((a,b)\right)+\frac12\lambda \left(\left\{ b\right\} \right) =\frac12\lambda \left([a,b]\right)+\frac12\lambda \left((a,b)\right).
?

Let XX be a Banach space and A,B∈B(X)A, B \in \mathcal{B}(X). Show that for any λ∈ρ(A)∩ρ(B)\lambda \in \rho (A) \cap \rho (B),

R(B;λ)−R(A;λ)=R(B;λ)(A−B)R(A;λ) R(B ; \lambda )-R(A ; \lambda ) = R(B ; \lambda )(A-B) R(A ; \lambda )
?

The resolvent R(λ,x)R(\lambda , x) of an element xx in a Banach algebra with unit is defined as

R(λ,x)=(λe−x)−1 R(\lambda , x) = (\lambda e-x)^{-1}

for all complex λ\lambda for which this inverse exists. Prove the identity

R(λ,x)−R(μ,x)=(μ−λ)R(λ)R(μ) R(\lambda , x)-R(\mu , x) = (\mu -\lambda ) R(\lambda ) R(\mu )

and use it to give an alternative proof of Theorem 18.5.

?

Let H,H0,VH, H_{0}, V be n×nn \times n matrices over C\mathbb {C} and H=H0+VH=H_{0}+V. Let z∈Cz \in \mathbb {C} and assume that zz is chosen so that (H0−zIn)−1(H_{0}-zI_{n})^{-1} and (H−zIn)−1(H-zI_{n})^{-1} exist. Show that

(H−zIn)−1=(H0−zIn)−1−(H0−zIn)−1V(H−zIn)−1. (H-zI_{n})^{-1} = (H_{0}-zI_{n})^{-1} - (H_{0}-zI_{n})^{-1}V(H-zI_{n})^{-1}.

This is called the second resolvent identity.

?

Let AA be an n×nn \times n matrix over C\mathbb {C}. If λ\lambda is not an eigenvalue of AA, then the matrix (A−λIn)(A - \lambda I_{n}) has an inverse, namely the resolvent

Rλ=(A−λIn)−1. R_{\lambda } = (A - \lambda I_{n})^{-1}.

Let λj\lambda_{j} be the eigenvalues of AA. For ∣λ∣≥a\left|\lambda \right| \geq a, where aa is any positive constant greater than all the ∣λj∣\left|\lambda_{j}\right| the resolvent can be expanded as

Rλ=−1λ(In+1λA+1λ2A2+⋯ ). R_{\lambda } = -\frac{1}{\lambda }\left(I_{n} + \frac{1}{\lambda }A + \frac{1}{\lambda ^{2}}A^{2} + \cdots \right).

Calculate

−12πi∮∣λ∣=aλmRλ dλ,m=0,1,2,…. -\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint _{\left|\lambda \right|=a} \lambda ^{m} R_{\lambda } \, d\lambda , \qquad m = 0, 1, 2, \ldots .
?

References

[Axl19] Axler S. Measure, Integration & Real Analysis. 3rd ed., Springer, 2019.
[BCK+24] Brayman V.B., Chaikovskyi A.V., Konstantinov O.Y., Kukush A.G., Mishura Y.S., Nesterenko O.N. Functional Analysis and Operator Theory. Springer, 2024.
[БСШ17] Бородин П.А., Савчук А.М., Шейпак И.А. Задачи по функциональному анализу. МЦНМО, 2017.
[Hal82] Halmos P.R. A Hilbert Space Problem Book. 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, 1982.
[KiGv88] Kirillov A.A., Gvishiani A.D. Теоремы и задачи функционального анализа. 2-е изд., Наука, 1988.
[Le13] Le A. Functional Analysis Problems with Solutions. 2013.
[Rud87] Rudin W. Real and Complex Analysis. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1987.
[StHa17] Steeb W., Hardy Y. Problems and Solutions in Introductory and Advanced Matrix Calculus. 2nd ed., World Scientific Publishing, 2017.