Separation theorems for convex sets (geometric Hahn-Banach)
[25/12%]Suppose is an open ball in a normed vector space such that . Prove that there exists such that
for all .
Prove that in a real NLS every closed ball with center at point 0 is the intersection of some family of sets of the form , where .
Prove that in a separable NLS every closed ball is the intersection of a countable family of sets of the form , where .
Prove that in a real separable NLS every closed ball is the intersection of a countable family of sets of the form , where .
Let and be two convex nonempty disjoint sets of a real Banach space , one of which has nonempty interior. Prove that there exist a linear continuous functional and a number such that the affine hyperplane separates and .
Let be the subspace of the real space consisting of all polynomials. Prove that and , the sets consisting of polynomials with positive (negative) leading coefficient, are convex, disjoint, but not separated by any hyperplane.
Let and be two convex closed nonempty disjoint sets of a real Banach space , one of which is compact. Prove that there exist a linear continuous functional and a number such that the affine hyperplane strictly separates and .
Let be a real TVS. Prove the following.
The closure of an open half-space is a closed half-space and the interior of a closed half-space is an open half-space. (Here a subset of is an open half-space if there is a continuous linear functional such that for some ; is a closed half-space if for some continuous linear functional and some .)
If , then and are strictly separated (separated) if and only if there is a continuous linear functional and a real scalar such that for all in and for all in ( for all in and for all in ). (Two subsets and of are strictly separated if they are contained in disjoint open half-spaces; they are separated if they are contained in two closed half-spaces whose intersection is a closed affine hyperplane.)
If is a continuous -linear functional and is an open convex subset of , then is an open interval.
Prove the following. If is a real LCS and , then the closed linear span of is the intersection of all closed hyperplanes containing .
Prove the following. Let be a complex LCS and let and be two disjoint closed convex subsets of . If is compact, then there is a continuous linear functional , an in , and an such that for in and in ,
Recall Theorem 3.7: if is a real TVS and and are disjoint convex sets with open, then there is a continuous linear functional and a real scalar such that for all in and for all in . If is also open, then and are strictly separated.
State and prove a version of this theorem for a complex TVS.
Recall Corollary 3.11: if is a real LCS and , then is the intersection of the closed half-spaces containing .
State and prove a version of this corollary for a complex LCS.
Recall Corollary 3.12: if is a real LCS and , then the closed linear span of is the intersection of all closed hyperplanes containing .
State and prove a version of this corollary for a complex LCS.
Let be a real LCS and let and be disjoint compact convex subsets of . Suppose is a subspace of and is a continuous linear functional such that for in and for in . Show by an example that it is not always possible to extend to a continuous linear functional on such that for in and for in .
Let be the space of all polynomials in with real coefficients, and (resp., ) the subset of polynomials with positive (resp., negative) leading coefficient. Prove that the sets and are convex, but cannot be separated by a hyperplane.
Prove that disjoint convex closed sets and can be strictly separated by a hyperplane if one is compact. (This means that there exist a continuous linear functional and constants such that on and on .)
Prove that every closed convex set in a real LCS is the intersection of some family of half-spaces of the form , where , .
Represent the unit ball of as an intersection of countably many half-spaces.
Let be a locally convex topological vector space, a closed subspace of , and belong to . Show that there is a continuous functional such that
Show that the Hyperplane Separation Theorem may be amended as follows: the point may be replaced by a convex set that is disjoint from and the conclusion is that and can be separated by a closed hyperplane if is compact. If is open, there is a continuous linear functional on for which for all .
Prove the Hyperplane Separation Theorem for , considered as a locally convex topological vector space with respect to the strong topology, by directly using Proposition 1.
Proposition 1: Let be a non-empty, closed, convex subset of a Hilbert space and be a vector in that lies outside of . Then there is exactly one vector that is closest to , in the sense that .
Call a set a hyperplane if there exist real numbers (with for at least one ) such that consists of all points that satisfy .
Suppose is a convex set in , with nonempty interior, and is a boundary point of . Prove that there is a hyperplane such that and lies entirely on one side of . (State the conclusion more precisely). Suggestion: Suppose 0 is an interior point of , let be the one-dimensional subspace that contains , and apply Theorem 3.2.
Suppose , with respect to Lebesgue measure. For each scalar , let be the set of all continuous functions on such that . Show that each is convex and that each is dense in . Thus and are disjoint convex sets (if ) which cannot be separated by any continuous linear functional on . Hint: What is ?
Suppose is a real vector space (without topology). Call a point an internal point of if is an absorbing set.
Suppose and are disjoint convex sets in , and has an internal point. Prove that there is a nonconstant linear functional on such that contains at most one point. (The proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.4).
Show (with , for example) that it may not be possible to have and disjoint, under the hypotheses of .
Let be an infinite-dimensional Banach space and let be the unit sphere of . We want to cover with finitely many closed balls, none of which contains the origin of . Can this be done in
every ,
some ,
no ?