Maximum modulus principle (theorem statement)
[65/82%]If an analytic function is regular in a closed disk and not a constant its absolute value at the center of the disk is smaller than the arithmetic mean of its absolute value on the boundary of the disk.
If the absolute value of an analytic function is constant in an open set of the -plane (e.g.in a disk) must be a constant.
The function is regular and single-valued in the interior of the closed domain and continuous in , boundary included; the maximum of on the boundary of is called . Under these conditions we have the inequality
in the interior of unless is a constant. [This statement is stronger than problem 135.]
We denote by a positive constant and by a connected open region. The analytic function is assumed to have the following properties:
-
is regular at every point of ;
-
is single-valued in ;
-
each boundary point of has for every positive number a neighbourhood such that at every point of in this neighbourhood the inequality
is satisfied. These conditions imply
and even unless is a constant. [Stronger than problem 275.]
The sum of the absolute values of several analytic functions attains its maximum on the boundary. Here is a more detailed statement: The functions are supposed to be regular and single-valued in the domain . Then the function
which is continuous in , assumes its maximum on the boundary of .
(continued). The function assumes its maximum only on the boundary of unless all the functions are constants.
We assume that the functions are regular and single-valued in the domain . Let denote positive numbers. The function
is continuous in . It reaches its maximum only on the boundary of unless all the functions are constants.
The function is supposed to be regular in the multiply connected closed domain and single-valued in . [ is not necessarily single-valued.] The absolute value attains its maximum at a boundary point of . The maximum cannot be attained at an inner point of unless is a constant.
The assumptions of problem 278 are weakened insofar as (3) is satisfied in all but possibly finitely many boundary points of . An other assumption, however, is added, namely that there exists a positive number for which the inequality
holds everywhere in . (Only the case is interesting.) This modification of the hypothesis does not change the conclusion of problem 278 that under those conditions , respectively. [In the case where the point at infinity belongs to and all the boundary points of lie in the disk we examine the comparison function .]
Prove that a function, regular in some domain and not identically constant, cannot attain its greatest absolute value at an interior point of this domain. (The maximum modulus principle.)
Let the function be regular in a domain . Prove that if, for every sequence of points converging to some boundary point of the domain , the inequality
holds, then either the inequality holds at every interior point of the domain , or .
Let be a polynomial of degree , and let . Prove that for the inequality
holds, and equality, for even one pair of values and , is possible only for a polynomial of the form .
Let . Prove that either the inequality holds at some point of the circle , or .
Let be a polynomial of degree satisfying, on the interval , the inequality . Prove that at every point lying outside this interval the inequality holds, where and are the semi-axes of the ellipse with foci and passing through the point .
Let the functions be regular in a domain , and let . Prove that if at least one of the is not identically constant, then at every point of the inequality holds.