Blaschke products and the Blaschke condition

[30/40%]
Show
LaTeX
?
(1)

Let ff be an analytic function that maps the open unit disc, D\mathbb {D}, into itself and vanishes at the origin. Prove that ∣f(z)+f(−z)∣≤2∣z∣2\left|f(z)+f(-z)\right| \leq 2\left|z\right|^{2} in D\mathbb {D}.

(2)

Prove that the inequality in Part 1 is strict, except at the origin, unless ff has the form f(z)=λz2f(z) = \lambda z^{2} with λ\lambda a constant of absolute value one.

Let the function ff be analytic in the unit disc, with ∣f(z)∣≤1\left|f(z)\right| \leq 1 and f(0)=0f(0) = 0. Assume that there is a number rr in (0,1)(0,1) such that f(r)=f(−r)=0f(r) = f(-r) = 0. Prove that

∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣∣z2−r21−r2z2∣. \left|f(z)\right| \leq \left|z\right|\left|\frac{z^{2}-r^{2}}{1-r^{2}z^{2}}\right|.
?
?
(a)

Let f(z)f(z) be a complex-valued function of a complex variable. If both f(z)f(z) and zf(z)zf(z) are harmonic in a domain Ω\Omega, prove that ff is analytic there.

(b)

Suppose that ff is analytic with ∣f(z)∣<1\left|f(z)\right| < 1 in ∣z∣<1\left|z\right| < 1 and that f(±a)=0f(\pm a) = 0 where aa is a complex number with 0<∣a∣<10 < \left|a\right| < 1. Show that ∣f(0)∣≤a2\left|f(0)\right| \leq a^2. What can you conclude if this holds with equality.

(c)

Determine all entire functions ff such that ∣f′(z)∣<∣f(z)∣\left|f'(z)\right| < \left|f(z)\right|.

Assume ff is analytic in a neighborhood of \closureD\closure D, ff maps DD into DD, and ff maps ∂D\partial D into ∂D\partial D, where D={z:∣z∣<1}D = \left\{ z : \left|z\right| < 1\right\}.

?
(a)

Show that ∀z∈∂D\forall z \in \partial D, f′(z)≠0f'(z) \neq 0.

(b)

Show that ddθ[arg⁡f(eiθ)]≥0\dfrac {d}{d\theta }[\arg f(e^{i\theta })] \geq 0 for θ\theta in R\mathbb {R}.

(c)

Assume that f(0)=f′(0)=0f(0) = f'(0) = 0 and f∣∂Df|_{\partial D} is a two-to-one map from ∂D\partial D onto ∂D\partial D. Show that f(z)≠0f(z) \neq 0 whenever 0<∣z∣<10 < \left|z\right| < 1.

Consider the unit disk DD and an analytic function f:D→Df : D \to D. If f(0)=a≠0f(0) = a \neq 0, show that ff does not have a zero in the disk {z:∣z∣<∣a∣}\left\{ z : \left|z\right| < \left|a\right|\right\}.

?

Let ff be an analytic function on D={z:∣z∣<1}D = \left\{ z : \left|z\right| < 1\right\}, f(D)⊂Df(D) \subset D and f(0)=0f(0) = 0.

?
(a)

Prove that ∣f(z)+f(−z)∣≤2∣z∣2\left|f(z) + f(-z)\right| \leq 2\left|z\right|^2 for all zz in DD, and if equality occurs for some non-zero zz in DD, then f(z)=eiαz2f(z) = e^{i\alpha } z^2.

(b)

Prove that

∣∫−11f(x) dx∣≤23. \left|\int _{-1}^{1} f(x)\, dx\right| \leq \frac23.

Prove the theorem: if for ∣z∣<1\left|z\right| < 1 the function f(z)f(z) is regular and ∣f(z)∣<M\left|f(z)\right| < M, while f(α)=0f(\alpha ) = 0, where ∣α∣<1\left|\alpha \right| < 1, then for ∣z∣<1\left|z\right| < 1 the inequality

∣f(z)∣⩽M⋅∣z−α1−α‾z∣ \left|f(z)\right| \leqslant M\cdot \left|\frac{z-\alpha }{1-\overline{\alpha }z}\right|

holds.

?

Prove the theorem: if f(z)f(z) is regular for ∣z∣<1\left|z\right| < 1; f(0)≠0f(0) \neq 0; ∣f(z)∣<M\left|f(z)\right| < M, and f(z)=0f(z) = 0 at z=z1,z2,z3,…z = z_{1}, z_{2}, z_{3}, \ldots, then the infinite product ∏ν=1∞∣zν∣\prod_{\nu =1}^{\infty } \left|z_{\nu }\right| converges.

?
Remark.
?

Hint. Consider the inequality

∣f(z)∣⩽M∣z−z11−z1‾z⋅z−z21−z2‾z⋯z−zn1−zn‾z∣. \left|f(z)\right| \leqslant M\left|\frac{z-z_{1}}{1-\overline{z_{1}}z}\cdot \frac{z-z_{2}}{1-\overline{z_{2}}z}\cdots \frac{z-z_{n}}{1-\overline{z_{n}}z}\right|.

Let the function f(z)f(z) be regular, have the zeros z1,z2,…,znz_{1},z_{2},\ldots ,z_{n} and let f(z)f(z) be bounded, ∣f(z)∣≤M\left|f(z)\right|\leq M, in the unit disk ∣z∣<1\left|z\right|<1. Then the stronger inequality

∣f(z)∣≤∣z−z11−z1‾z⋅z−z21−z2‾z⋯z−zn1−zn‾z∣M \left|f(z)\right| \leq \left|\frac{z-z_{1}}{1-\overline{z_{1}}z}\cdot \frac{z-z_{2}}{1-\overline{z_{2}}z}\cdots \frac{z-z_{n}}{1-\overline{z_{n}}z}\right|M

holds for ∣z∣<1\left|z\right|<1. We have equality either at every point or at no point of the open disk ∣z∣<1\left|z\right|<1. (Proposition 280 is a special case, n=1n=1, z1=0z_{1}=0.)

?

Let the function f(z)f(z) be regular, have the zeros z1,z2,…,znz_{1},z_{2},\ldots ,z_{n} and let f(z)f(z) be bounded, ∣f(z)∣≤M\left|f(z)\right|\leq M, in the open half-plane Re(z)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right)>0. Then the stronger inequality

∣f(z)∣≤∣z1−zz1‾+z⋅z2−zz2‾+z⋯zn−zzn‾+z∣M \left|f(z)\right| \leq \left|\frac{z_{1}-z}{\overline{z_{1}}+z}\cdot \frac{z_{2}-z}{\overline{z_{2}}+z}\cdots \frac{z_{n}-z}{\overline{z_{n}}+z}\right|M

holds for all zz with Re(z)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right)>0. We have equality either at every point or at no point of the right half-plane Re(z)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right)>0.

?

A function that is meromorphic in a closed disk and of constant absolute value on the boundary circle is a rational function; in fact it is, up to a constant factor, the product of linear fractional functions that map the disk in question either onto the interior or the exterior of the unit circle.

?

[W. Blaschke: Sber. Naturf. Ges. Lpz. Vol. 67, p.194 (1915).] We assume that the function f(z)f(z) is regular and bounded in the disk ∣z∣<1\left|z\right|<1 and vanishes at the points z1,z2,z3,…z_{1},z_{2},z_{3},\ldots Then

(1−∣z1∣)+(1−∣z2∣)+(1−∣z3∣)+⋯ (1-\left|z_{1}\right|) + (1-\left|z_{2}\right|) + (1-\left|z_{3}\right|) + \cdots

(the sum of the distances of the zeros from the unit circle) is finite or else f(z)≡0f(z)\equiv 0.

?

We assume that the function f(z)f(z) is regular and bounded in the half-plane Re(z)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right)>0 and vanishes at the points z1,z2,z3,…z_{1},z_{2},z_{3},\ldots outside the unit disk in the half-plane, i.e.∣zn∣>1\left|z_{n}\right|>1, Re(zn)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z_{n}\right)>0, n=1,2,3,…n=1,2,3,\ldots Then the sum of the series

\re1z1+\re1z2+\re1z3+⋯ \re \frac{1}{z_{1}} + \re \frac{1}{z_{2}} + \re \frac{1}{z_{3}} + \cdots

is finite or else f(z)≡0f(z)\equiv 0.

?

Consider a function which is regular in the interior of the unit circle, and let k>0k > 0. If the integral ∫01(1−t)k−1log⁡M(t) dt\int_{0}^{1} (1-t)^{k-1} \log M(t) \, dt is convergent then the series ∑n=1∞(1−rn)k+1\sum_{n=1}^{\infty } (1 - r_{n})^{k+1} is also convergent.

?

Suppose RR is a rational function such that ∣R(z)∣=1\left|R(z)\right| = 1 if ∣z∣=1\left|z\right| = 1. Prove that

R(z)=czm∏n=1kz−αn1−αˉnz R(z) = c z^{m} \prod _{n = 1}^{k} \frac{z-\alpha _{n}}{1-\bar{\alpha }_{n} z}

where cc is a constant, mm is an integer, and α1,…,αk\alpha_{1}, \ldots , \alpha_{k} are complex numbers such that αn≠0\alpha_{n} \neq 0 and ∣αn∣≠1\left|\alpha_{n}\right| \neq 1. Note that each of the above factors has absolute value 1 if ∣z∣=1\left|z\right| = 1.

?

Obtain an analogous description of those rational functions which are positive on TT. Hint: Such a function must have the same number of zeros as poles in UU. Consider products of factors of the form

(z−α)(1−αˉz)(z−β)(1−βˉz) \frac{(z-\alpha )(1-\bar{\alpha } z)}{(z-\beta )(1-\bar{\beta } z)}

where ∣α∣<1\left|\alpha \right| < 1 and ∣β∣<1\left|\beta \right| < 1.

?

Suppose 0<α<1,0<β<1,f∈H(U),f(U)⊂U0 < \alpha < 1,0 < \beta < 1, f \in H(U), f(U) \subset U, and f(0)=αf(0) = \alpha. How many zeros can ff have in the disc⁡Dˉ(0;β)\operatorname {disc} \bar{D}(0 ; \beta )? What is the answer if

?
(a)

α=12,β=12\alpha = \frac{1}{2}, \beta = \frac{1}{2};

(b)

α=14,β=12\alpha = \frac{1}{4}, \beta = \frac{1}{2};

(c)

α=23,β=13\alpha = \frac{2}{3}, \beta = \frac{1}{3};

(d)

α=1/1,000\alpha = 1 / 1{,}000, β=1/10\beta = 1 / 10?

Under what conditions on a sequence of real numbers yny_{n} does there exist a bounded holomorphic function in the open right half plane which is not identically zero but which has a zero at each point 1+iyn1+i y_{n}? In particular, can this happen if

?
(a)

yn=log⁡ny_{n} = \log n;

(b)

yn=ny_{n} = \sqrt{n};

(c)

yn=ny_{n} = n;

(d)

yn=n2y_{n} = n^{2}?

Suppose 0<∣αn∣<1,Σ(1−∣αn∣)<∞0 < \left|\alpha_{n}\right| < 1, \Sigma \left(1-\left|\alpha_{n}\right|\right) < \infty, and BB is the Blaschke product with zeros at the points αn\alpha_{n}. Let EE be the set of all points 1/αˉn1 / \bar{\alpha }_{n} and let Ω\Omega be the complement of the closure of EE. Prove that the product actually converges uniformly on every compact subset of Ω\Omega, so that B∈H(Ω)B \in H(\Omega ), and that BB has a pole at each point of EE. (This is of particular interest in those cases in which Ω\Omega is connected).

?

Put αn=1−n−2\alpha_{n} = 1-n^{-2}, for n=1,2,3,…n = 1,2,3, \ldots, let BB be the Blaschke product with zeros at these points α\alpha, and prove that lim⁡r→1B(r)=0\lim_{r \rightarrow 1} B(r) = 0. (It is understood that 0<r<10 < r < 1).

More precisely, show that the estimate

∣B(r)∣<∏1N−1r−αn1−αnr<∏1N−1αN−αn1−αn<2e−N/3 \left|B(r)\right| < \prod _{1}^{N-1} \frac{r-\alpha _{n}}{1-\alpha _{n} r} < \prod _{1}^{N-1} \frac{\alpha _{N}-\alpha _{n}}{1-\alpha _{n}} < 2 e^{-N / 3}

is valid if αN−1<r<αN\alpha_{N-1} < r < \alpha_{N}.

?

Prove that there is a sequence {αn}\left\{ \alpha_{n}\right\} with 0<αn<10 < \alpha_{n} < 1, which tends to 1 so rapidly that the Blaschke product with zeros at the points αn\alpha_{n} satisfies the condition

lim⁡sup⁡r→1∣B(r)∣=1 \underset {r \rightarrow 1}{\lim \sup }\left|B(r)\right| = 1

Hence this BB has no radial limit at z=1z = 1.

?

Let φ\varphi be a linear fractional transformation which maps UU onto UU. For any z∈Uz \in U define the φ\varphi-orbit of zz to be the set {φn(z)}\left\{ \varphi_{n}(z)\right\}, where φ0(z)=z,φn(z)=φ(φn−1(z)),n=1,2,3,…\varphi_{0}(z) = z, \varphi_{n}(z) = \varphi \left(\varphi_{n-1}(z)\right), n = 1,2,3, \ldots Ignore the case φ(z)=z\varphi (z) = z.

?
(a)

For which φ\varphi is it true that the φ\varphi-orbits satisfy the Blaschke condition Σ(1−∣φn(z)∣)<∞\Sigma \left(1-\left|\varphi_{n}(z)\right|\right) < \infty?

(b)

For which φ\varphi do there exist nonconstant functions f∈H∞f \in H^{\infty } which are invariant under φ\varphi, i.e., which satisfy the relation f(φ(z))=f(z)f(\varphi (z)) = f(z) for all z∈Uz \in U?

Suppose ∣α1∣≤∣α2∣≤∣α3∣≤⋯<1\left|\alpha_{1}\right| \leq \left|\alpha_{2}\right| \leq \left|\alpha_{3}\right| \leq \cdots < 1, and let n(r)n(r) be the number of terms in the sequence {αj}\left\{ \alpha_{j}\right\} such that ∣αj∣≤r\left|\alpha_{j}\right| \leq r. Prove that

∫01n(r)dr=∑j=1∞(1−∣αj∣) \int _{0}^{1} n(r) d r = \sum _{j = 1}^{\infty }\left(1-\left|\alpha _{j}\right|\right)
?

If B(z)=ΣckzkB(z) = \Sigma c_{k} z^{k} is a Blaschke product with at least one zero off the origin, is it possible to have ck≥0c_{k} \geq 0 for k=0,1,2,…k = 0,1,2, \ldots?

?

Suppose BB is a Blaschke product all of whose zeros lie on the segment (0,1)(0,1) and

f(z)=(z−1)2B(z) f(z) = (z-1)^{2} B(z)

Prove that the derivative of ff is bounded in UU.

?

Suppose Ω⊃Uˉ,f∈H(Ω),∣f(eiθ)∣≥3\Omega \supset \bar{U}, f \in H(\Omega ),\left|f\left(e^{i \theta }\right)\right| \geq 3 for all real θ,f(0)=0\theta , f(0) = 0, and λ1,λ2,…,λN\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \ldots , \lambda_{N} are the zeros of 1−f1-f in UU, counted according to their multiplicities. Prove that

∣λ1λ2⋯λN∣<12 \left|\lambda _{1} \lambda _{2} \cdots \lambda _{N}\right| < \frac{1}{2}

Suggestion: Look at B/(1−f)B /(1-f), where BB is a certain Blaschke product.

?

Prove the following converse of Theorem 15.24: If f∈H(U)f \in H(U) and if

lim⁡r→1∫−ππ∣log⁡∣f(reiθ)∣∣dθ=0(*) \lim _{r \rightarrow 1} \int _{-\pi }^{\pi }\left|\log \left|f\left(r e^{i \theta }\right)\right|\right| d \theta = 0 \tag {*}

then ff is a Blaschke product. Hint: (∗)\left({ }^{*}\right) implies

lim⁡r→1∫−ππlog⁡+∣f(reiθ)∣dθ=0 \lim _{r \rightarrow 1} \int _{-\pi }^{\pi } \log ^{+}\left|f\left(r e^{i \theta }\right)\right| d \theta = 0

Since log⁡+∣f∣≥0\log^{+}\left|f\right| \geq 0, it follows from Theorems 17.3 and 17.5 that log⁡+∣f∣=0\log^{+}\left|f\right| = 0, so ∣f∣≤1\left|f\right| \leq 1. Now f=Bg,gf = B g, g has no zeros, ∣g∣≤1\left|g\right| \leq 1, and (∗)\left({ }^{*}\right) holds with 1/g1 / g in place of ff. By the first argument, ∣1/g∣≤1\left|1 / g\right| \leq 1. Hence ∣g∣=1\left|g\right| = 1.

?

Let the function f(z)f(z) be regular for Re(z)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right) > 0, satisfy there the inequality ∣f(z)∣<1\left|f(z)\right| < 1, and vanish at the points z1,z2,…,zmz_{1}, z_{2}, \ldots , z_{m}. Prove that

∣f(z)∣⩽∣z−z1∣∣z−z2∣…∣z−zm∣∣z+zˉ1∣∣z+zˉ2∣…∣z+zˉm∣(Re(z)>0) \left|f(z)\right| \leqslant \frac{\left|z-z_{1}\right|\left|z-z_{2}\right| \ldots \left|z-z_{m}\right|}{\left|z+\bar{z}_{1}\right|\left|z+\bar{z}_{2}\right| \ldots \left|z+\bar{z}_{m}\right|} \quad (\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right) > 0)
?

Let the function f(z)f(z) be regular and bounded in the half-plane Re(z)>0\mathrm{Re}\left(z\right) > 0, and vanish at a sequence of points {zn},zn→∞\left\{ z_{n}\right\} , z_{n} \rightarrow \infty, of this half-plane. Prove that either f(z)≡0f(z) \equiv 0, or the series ∑n=1∞Re(1zn)\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty } \mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1}{z_{n}}\right) converges.

?

Let the function f(z)f(z) be regular and bounded in the disk ∣z∣<R\left|z\right| < R, and vanish at a sequence {zn}\left\{ z_{n}\right\} of points of this disk. Prove that either f(z)≡0f(z) \equiv 0, or the series ∑n=1∞(R−∣zn∣)\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty }\left(R-\left|z_{n}\right|\right) converges.

?

References

[deSi04] de Souza P.N., Silva J. Berkeley Problems in Mathematics. 3rd ed., Springer, 2004.
[CJP+11] Chen J., Jiang G., Pan Y., Qin T., Tong Y., Wu Q., Xu S., Li T. Problems and Solutions in Mathematics. 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2011.
[ГюКу03] Гюнтер Н.М., Кузьмин Р.О. Сборник задач по высшей математике. 13-е изд., Издательство «Лань», 2003.
[PóSz98] Pólya G., Szegő G. Problems and Theorems in Analysis. Springer, 1998.
[Rud87] Rudin W. Real and Complex Analysis. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1987.
[ШПК15] Шабунин М.И., Половинкин Е.С., Карлов М.И. Сборник задач по теории функций комплексного переменного. 4-е изд., БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 2015.