Spaces
[29/0%]Prove Theorems 17.4 and 17.5 for upper semicontinuous subharmonic functions.
Assume and prove that is subharmonic in .
Suppose and . Prove that if and only if there is a harmonic function in such that for all . Prove that if there is one such harmonic majorant of , then there is at least one, say . (Explicitly, and is harmonic; and if and is harmonic, then ). Prove that . Hint: Consider the harmonic functions in , , with boundary values , and let .
Prove likewise that if and only if has a harmonic majorant in .
Suppose , and . Does it follow that ? Answer the same question with in place of .
If , show that is a proper subclass of .
Show that is a proper subclass of the intersection of all with .
If and , prove that .
Suppose and is not dense in the plane. Prove that has finite radial limits at almost all points of .
Fix . Prove that the mapping is a bounded linear functional on . Since is a Hilbert space, this functional can be represented as an inner product with some . Find this .
Fix . How large can be if ? Find the extremal functions. Do the same for .
Suppose , and is real a.e. on . Prove that is then constant. Show that this result is false for every .
Suppose , and suppose there exists an such that maps every circle of radius and center 0 onto a curve whose length is at most . Prove that has a continuous extension to and that the restriction of to is absolutely continuous.
Suppose is a complex Borel measure on such that
Prove that then either or the support of is all of .
Suppose is a proper compact subset of the unit circle . Prove that every continuous function on can be uniformly approximated on by polynomials. Hint: Use Exercise 14.
Complete the proof of Theorem 17.17 for the case .
Let be a nonconstant inner function with no zero in .
Prove that if .
Prove that there is at least one such that .
Hint: is a negative harmonic function.
Suppose is a nonconstant inner function, , and . Prove that for at least one .
Suppose and . Prove that is then an outer function.
Suppose and for all . Prove that is an outer function.
Prove that if and only if , where and and has no zero in .
Prove the following converse of Theorem 15.24: If and if
then is a Blaschke product. Hint: implies
Since , it follows from Theorems 17.3 and 17.5 that , so . Now has no zeros, , and holds with in place of . By the first argument, . Hence .
Find the conditions mentioned in Sec. 17.22.
Section 17.22 (Remark): Let be the shift operator on , ; a closed subspace of with is called -invariant. By Beurling's theorem (Theorem 17.21), every closed -invariant subspace of other than is of the form for an inner function , and is determined by the subspace up to a constant factor; by Theorem 17.15, every inner function has the form
where is a constant, , is a Blaschke product, and is a finite positive Borel measure on which is singular with respect to Lebesgue measure. Combining these, the -invariant subspaces of are characterized by the following data: a sequence of complex numbers (possibly finite, or even empty) such that and (the zeros of ), and a positive Borel measure on , singular with respect to Lebesgue measure. The book states that it is easy to find conditions, in terms of and , which ensure that one -invariant subspace of contains another.
The conformal mapping of onto a vertical strip shows that M. Riesz's theorem on conjugate functions cannot be extended to . Deduce that it cannot be extended to either.
Suppose , and associate with each its Fourier coefficients
Deduce the following statements from Theorem 17.26:
To each there corresponds a function such that for but for all . In fact, there is a constant , depending only on , such that
The mapping is thus a bounded linear projection of into . The Fourier series of is obtained from that of by deleting the terms with .
Show that the same is true if we delete the terms with , where is any given integer.
Deduce from (b) that the partial sums of the Fourier series of any form a bounded sequence in . Conclude further that we actually have
If and if
then , and every is so obtained. Thus the projection mentioned in (a) may be regarded as a mapping of onto .
Show that there is a much simpler proof of Theorem 17.26 if , and find the best value of .
Suppose in and . Prove that
for all .
Prove that the following statements are correct if is a sequence of positive integers which tends to sufficiently rapidly. If
then for all such that
Hence
for every , although
exists (and is finite) for almost all . Interpret this geometrically, in terms of the lengths of the images under of the radii in .
Use Theorem 17.11 to obtain the following characterization of the boundary values of functions, for :
A function is (a.e). for some if and only if
for all negative integers .