Banach-space-valued analytic functions

[4/0%]
Show
LaTeX

If GG is an open subset of C\mathbb {C} and f:G→Xf: G \to \mathcal{X} is a function such that for each x∗x^* in X∗\mathcal{X}^*, x∗∘f:G→Cx^* \circ f: G \to \mathbb {C} is analytic, then ff is analytic. If the word continuous'' is substituted for both occurrences of the word analytic,'' is the preceding statement still true?

?
Problem 3.3.26 from Rudin W. "Functional Analysis" [Rud91]More problems in Chapter 3.3 "Convexity"

Suppose Ω\Omega is a region in C,X\mathbb {C}, X is a Fréchet space, and f:Ω→Xf: \Omega \rightarrow X is holomorphic.

?
(a)

State and prove a theorem concerning the power series representation of ff, that is, concerning the formula f(z)=∑(z−a)ncnf(z) = \sum (z-a)^{n} c_{n}, where cn∈Xc_{n} \in X.

(b)

Generalize Morera's theorem to XX-valued holomorphic functions.

(c)

For a sequence of complex holomorphic functions in Ω\Omega, uniform convergence on compact subsets of Ω\Omega implies that the limit is holomorphic. Does this generalize to XX-valued holomorphic functions?

Suppose that Ω\Omega is open in CC and that f:Ω→Af: \Omega \rightarrow A and φ:Ω→C\varphi : \Omega \rightarrow C are holomorphic. Prove that φf:Ω→A\varphi f: \Omega \rightarrow A is holomorphic.

?
Remark.
?

This was used in the proof of Theorem 10.13, with φ(λ)=λn\varphi (\lambda ) = \lambda^{n}.

Suppose Ω\Omega is open in C,α\mathcal{C}, \alpha is an isolated boundary point of Ω,f:Ω→X\Omega , f: \Omega \rightarrow X is a holomorphic XX-valued function (where XX is some complex Banach space), and there is a smallest nonnegative integer nn such that

∣λ−α∣n∥f(λ)∥ \left|\lambda -\alpha \right|^{n}\left\| f(\lambda )\right\|

is bounded as λ→α\lambda \rightarrow \alpha. If n>0n > 0, then ff is said to have a pole of order nn at α\alpha.

?
(a)

Suppose x∈Ax \in A and (λe−x)−1(\lambda e-x)^{-1} has a pole at every point of σ(x)\sigma (x). Prove that there is a nontrivial polynomial PP such that P(x)=0P(x) = 0.

(b)

As a special case of (a)(a), assume σ(x)={0}\sigma (x) = \left\{ 0\right\} and (λe−x)−1(\lambda e-x)^{-1} has a pole of order nn at 0. Prove that xn=0x^{n} = 0.

Remark.
?

In part (a): this can happen only when σ(x)\sigma (x) is a finite set.

References

[Con07] Conway J.B. A Course in Functional Analysis. 2nd ed., Springer, 2007.
[Rud91] Rudin W. Functional Analysis. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1991.