The Radon-Nikodym Theorem, Part I
[21/62%]In the definition of an additive set function, show that the series must converge absolutely.
In Claim 4, quickly verify that is a finite measure with support .
Definition (preceding Claim 4). Let denote a Hahn decomposition of with respect to the additive set function . Define and by writing and for every ; and are called the upper and lower variation of , and is called the Jordan decomposition of .
Claim 4. Assume the notation above. The functions and above are finite measures on , having supports and , respectively. (Therefore, and have disjoint supports.) [The proof for is given in the text; this exercise asks for the analogous argument for .]
Suppose that ( ) and ( ) are Hahn decompositions with respect to an additive set function . Then .
The Jordan decomposition of an additive set function is unique.
This problem relates somewhat the notion of absolute continuity with the familiar concepts.
Let and denote measures with common domain and such that is finite. Then iff for every there is such that forces .
The claim in (a) is not necessarily true if is infinite, since the condition does not imply the condition.
Let , and denote measures, each having common domain .
If and , then .
If and , then .
If and , then .
If and , then .
If , then .
If and are -finite with , then .
Claim 1 may be generalized to the following claim: if is a sequence of -sets such that exists [i.e. ], then .
Claim 1 (Chapter 9). Let denote an additive set function on .
If is a nondecreasing sequence of -sets with limit , then .
If is a nonincreasing sequence of -sets with limit , then .
Write for the Jordan decomposition of , and recall that and are finite measures.
Let . Define for every .
is an additive set function such that and for every .
If and , then ( ) is a Hahn decomposition with respect to .
Let denote the collection of additive set functions with domain .
is a linear space over : for and we have .
Given , define , where is the Jordan decomposition of . Then is a norm on .
Is M a Banach space?
Let ( ) denote a Hahn decomposition of the additive set function , and let denote the Jordan decomposition. We have
for every .
The Radon-Nikodym Theorem may fail if is not -finite, even if is finite.
Let be uncountable, let , let denote counting measure, and let or as is amc or is amc. In particular, for every . If there is an satisfying the conclusion of the Radon-Nikodym Theorem, then for every we have , giving on . (Recall Exercise 7 from Section 6.2.) Then , a contradiction.
Let and denote -finite measures having domain . We have the following claims.
If and , then -a.e. on .
If and , then and -a.e. on .
If and , then -a.e. on .
Let and . Then if and only if , in which case we have
Let and denote finite measures with domain . Let denote a sub--field of . Let and denote the restrictions of and to . In accordance with the Lebesgue Decomposition Theorem, let and denote the absolutely continuous and singular parts of with respect to . Similarly, let and denote the absolutely continuous and singular parts of with respect to . Then
Refer to the proof of the finite version of the Radon-Nikodym Theorem, letting be nonnegative, finite, and such that for every . Also note that . We have , hence there is a nonnegative finite-valued with for every . Find such that and , so that and have disjoint supports.
Let and denote finite measures with domain . Let denote a sequence of finite measures with domain such that . Assume for each and that
where each is a nonnegative finite-valued function on and each is singular with respect to . Finally, assume for each that
where is a nonnegative finite-valued function on and .
-a.e. on .
.
iff for every .
Suppose that and are -finite measures on . The Lebesgue decomposition of with respect to is unique. That is, if where and are -finite measures with and , and if in addition where and are -finite measures with and , then and .
Let and denote measures with domain and such that for every . Let and . Then , so that .
Let , where are nonnegative real numbers and are disjoint -sets with union . Then , and
so the result holds for nonnegative finite-valued -measurable simple functions defined on . Next, let be defined on and -measurable. Let denote a nondecreasing sequence of nonnegative finite-valued -measurable simple functions defined on with . By what we have just shown and MCT,
For general , write .
Let and denote finite measures with common domain . Let . Then is in both and and
Observe that ; use Exercise 16 to obtain that is in both and . Establish the formula by first considering simple functions. Use MCT and the formula for simple functions to get the result for nonnegative functions. For general functions , consider positive and negative parts and apply the result for nonnegative functions. This will all be very straightforward.
This exercise relies on Exercise 17, which in turn relies on Exercise 16. Let and denote finite measures with common domain and such that . There exists -measurable defined on with and such that
For , define . The finiteness of and forces the finiteness of , and hence by Claim 1 of Section 8.5. Since , the previous exercise gives , hence is meaningfully defined and finite on . It is easy to verify that is linear. Using Hölder's Inequality with for the functions and , we have for every that
by virtue of the previous exercise ( denotes the norm on ). It follows that is a bounded linear functional on . The Riesz Representation Theorem for asserts the existence of a function in such that
If is negative on some with , then , but at the same time we have , a contradiction. Therefore, if is negative on some , then , that is, -a.e. on . Next, observe by the previous display and Exercise 17 that
for every . Let . Then we have , and the previous display with gives
hence . The assumption gives . (This is the only time that the assumption is used.) If , then
Therefore, we may take to complete the proof.
Use Exercise 18 [which relies on Exercises 16 and 17] to prove the finite version of the Radon-Nikodym Theorem: Let and denote finite measures with domain and such that . Then there exists a nonnegative finite-valued -measurable function on such that for every .
Let be bounded, and let be as in Exercise 18. Since and are bounded and is finite, it follows for every that . Using Exercise 18 we obtain
Since , this gives for each . Using MCT and the fact that gives
In particular, if , then , hence the finiteness of forces , so may be taken to be finite on all of . Clearly is nonnegative. Write and let , where is arbitrary. We have from the chain of equalities above that for every , so satisfies the conclusion of the finite version of the Radon-Nikodym Theorem. The proof for the uniqueness of as given in the text of course works here --- the real work is in showing the existence, not uniqueness.
Let , and denote finite measures. Assume that
Then we have for -a.e. that
This exercise and Exercise 21 are taken from Section 32 of Halmos' Measure Theory. For Exercise 21 [which is not terribly difficult], recall the discussion on notation found at the end of that section. Exercise 21 requires the solution of Exercise 12(b).
Let and denote sequences of finite measures with domain . For each define and . Define and , and further assume that both and are finite. The goal is to prove the following: If for every , then and -a.e. on . Follow Halmos' outline given below.
If is a sequence of -sets with for every , then .
If and are sequences of -measurable functions on such that -a.e. on for every , then
From (b), it is sufficient to prove the main claim for any fixed determination of the Radon-Nikodym derivatives . For each , write and . From Exercise 12(b), one such determination is
We have and , both equalities holding -a.e. on .
Part (d) directly implies the main claim of this exercise.