Section 4.1

Lebesgue Measure: Existence and Uniqueness

[9/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 4.1.1

Let x∈Rx \in \mathbb {R} and k⩾2k \geqslant 2. Then λ({x})=λk({x}×Rk−1)=0\lambda (\left\{ x\right\} )=\lambda_{k}\left(\left\{ x\right\} \times \mathbb {R}^{k-1}\right)=0. Next, for any j∈{1,…,k−1}j \in \left\{ 1, \ldots , k-1\right\} and x∈Rj\boldsymbol {x} \in \mathbb {R}^{j} we have λk({x}×Rk−j)=0\lambda_{k}\left(\left\{ \boldsymbol {x}\right\} \times \mathbb {R}^{k-j}\right)=0.

?
Problem 4.1.2

Enumerate the rationals in (0,1](0,1] by {q1,q2,…}\left\{ q_{1}, q_{2}, \ldots \right\}. Given arbitrarily small ε>0\varepsilon >0, remove the interval An=(qn−ε/2n+1,qn+ε/2n+1)∩(0,1]A_{n}=\left(q_{n}-\varepsilon / 2^{n+1}, q_{n}+\varepsilon / 2^{n+1}\right) \cap (0,1]. Let A=⋃n=1∞AnA=\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty } A_{n}. Then λˉ(A)⩽ε\bar{\lambda }(A) \leqslant \varepsilon, despite the fact that AA is an open dense subset of (0,1](0,1]. Also, we have λˉ((0,1]\A)⩾1−ε\bar{\lambda }((0,1] \backslash A) \geqslant 1-\varepsilon, even though (0,1]\A(0,1] \backslash A is a nowhere dense subset of (0,1](0,1].

?
Problem 4.1.3

There cannot exist a closed subset of (0,1](0,1] whose interior is empty, yet has λˉ\bar{\lambda }-measure of one.

?
Problem 4.1.4

λk\lambda_{k} is nonatomic: any A∈BkA \in \mathscr {B}^{k} with λk(A)>0\lambda_{k}(A)>0 has a proper subset B∈BkB \in \mathscr {B}^{k} with 0<λk(B)<λk(A)0<\lambda_{k}(B)<\lambda_{k}(A). This forces λˉk\bar{\lambda }_{k} to be nonatomic as well.

?
Problem 4.1.5

Let k⩾2k \geqslant 2. There exists an uncountable set U∈BkU \in \mathscr {B}^{k} with λk(U)=0\lambda_{k}(U)=0.

?
Problem 4.1.6

∣Lk∣=2c\left|\mathscr {L}^{k}\right|=2^{\mathrm{c}} and ∣Bk∣=c\left|\mathscr {B}^{k}\right|=\mathrm{c} for each k∈Nk \in \mathbb {N}.

?
Problem 4.1.7

Assume that L=2R\mathscr {L}=2^{\mathbb {R}}; in particular every one of the 2c2^{\mathrm{c}} subsets of [0,1]\left[0,1\right] is a Lebesgue set. Let B={λˉ(A):A⊆[0,1],λˉ(A)∉A}B=\left\{ \bar{\lambda }(A): A \subseteq [0,1], \bar{\lambda }(A) \notin A\right\}. Consideration of the set BB (which is in L\mathscr {L} be assumption) leads to contradiction.

?
Problem 4.1.8

Let k⩾2k \geqslant 2. Every line is in Bk\mathscr {B}^{k}, has λk\lambda_{k}-measure zero, and hence has λˉk\bar{\lambda }_{k}-measure.

?
Problem 4.1.9

Let B(0,1]=σ({(a,b]:(a,b]⊆(0,1]})\mathscr {B}_{(0,1]}=\sigma (\left\{ (a, b]:(a, b] \subseteq (0,1]\right\} ).

?
(a)

B(0,1]={B⊆(0,1]:B∈B}\mathscr {B}_{(0,1]}=\left\{ B \subseteq (0,1]: B \in \mathscr {B}\right\} and B(0,1]‾={B⊆(0,1]:B∈L}\overline{\mathscr {B}_{(0,1]}}=\left\{ B \subseteq (0,1]: B \in \mathscr {L}\right\}.

(b)

Construct Lebesgue measure on both B(0,1]\mathfrak {B}_{(0,1]} and B(0,1]‾\overline{\mathfrak {B}_{(0,1]}}. Call these measures λ(0,1]\lambda_{(0,1]} and λˉ(0,1]\bar{\lambda }_{(0,1]}, and denote B(0,1]‾\overline{\mathcal{B}_{(0,1]}} by L(0,1]\mathscr {L}_{(0,1]}.

(c)

λ(0,1]\lambda_{(0,1]} as constructed is the measure restriction of λ\lambda from B\mathfrak {B} to B(0,1]\mathfrak {B}_{(0,1]} and λˉ(0,1]\bar{\lambda }_{(0,1]} as constructed is the measure restriction of λˉ\bar{\lambda } from L\mathscr {L} to L(0,1]\mathscr {L}_{(0,1]}.