Measures
[12/92%]This problem deals with some other variants of properties (M1)-(M3).
Some define a probability measure on a -field of subsets of by stipulating that (i) for all , (ii) , and (iii) is countably additive. This is a special case of our definition of a measure.
If (M1) and (M3) hold for a set function defined on a field with for some , then is a measure on .
Let , and let . Define on as in Example 2. Then ( ) is a measure space, and is -finite iff for each .
Let , and . Then is a measure space, but fails to be -finite.
Let be uncountable. Let . Write if is amc and if is amc. Then ( ) is a measure space, and is not -finite.
Let be arbitrary, and let . Define over by stating that if is amc, and if is amc.
is not well-defined if is amc, but is well-defined if is uncountable.
is -finite measure on the -field when is uncountable.
Suppose that is a finite -field on . Suppose that is defined on such that (M1), (M2), and (M4) hold. Then ( ) is a measure space.
Let . Define on by
fails to be well-defined when is finite.
If is infinite, then satisfies (M1), (M2), and (M4).
Let . Then is finitely additive but not countably subadditive.
When is uncountable, is a measure. Is -finite?
Let and . Let
Then is well-defined, satisfies (M1), (M2), and (M4), and that (M3) fails. Also, is -finite.
(M5) is not true if the hypothesis is omitted.
Let denote a measure on a -field , and let .
when the 's are disjoint with .
iff .
forces both and .
forces .
Let be a measure space such that there is with . Fix such a , and define by the formula .
is a measure space.
Suppose in addition that is the disjoint union of an amc collection of sets such that each has finite measure, and suppose that is finite. Then for all we have . Also, for each we have
This formula is known as Bayes' Rule.
Let , and let denote a collection of nonnegative numbers with . Let denote the set of sequences of . For each , write . Given and , let
Such a set is called a cylinder of rank . Let , so that consists of all cylinders of all ranks. Define as follows: if for some and we have , write .
is well-defined.
satisfies (M1) and (M2), and is finitely additive.
Accept without proof, or recall, a special case of Tychonoff's Theorem: let denote a sequence of cylinders with . If , then for some . Any function on that satisfies (M1), (M2), and (M4) also satisfies (M3). Therefore, is a measure, often referred to as product measure.