Section 2.1

Measures

[12/92%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 2.1.1

This problem deals with some other variants of properties (M1)-(M3).

?
(a)

Some define a probability measure PP on a σ\sigma-field A\mathcal{A} of subsets of Ω\Omega by stipulating that (i) 0⩽P(A)⩽10 \leqslant P(A) \leqslant 1 for all A∈AA \in \mathcal{A}, (ii) P(Ω)=1P(\Omega )=1, and (iii) PP is countably additive. This is a special case of our definition of a measure.

(b)

If (M1) and (M3) hold for a set function μ\mu defined on a field A\mathcal{A} with μ(A)<+∞\mu (A)<+\infty for some A∈AA \in \mathcal{A}, then μ\mu is a measure on A\mathcal{A}.

Problem 2.1.2

Let Ω={ω1,…,ωn}\Omega =\left\{ \omega_{1}, \ldots , \omega_{n}\right\}, and let p1,…,pn∈[0,+∞]p_{1}, \ldots , p_{n} \in [0,+\infty ]. Define μ\mu on 2Ω2^{\Omega } as in Example 2. Then ( Ω,2Ω,μ\Omega , 2^{\Omega }, \mu ) is a measure space, and μ\mu is σ\sigma-finite iff pn<+∞p_{n}<+\infty for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N}.

?
Problem 2.1.3

Let A={∅,Ω},μ(∅)=0\mathcal{A}=\left\{ \varnothing , \Omega \right\} , \mu (\varnothing )=0, and μ(Ω)=+∞\mu (\Omega )=+\infty. Then (Ω,A,μ)(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, \mu ) is a measure space, but μ\mu fails to be σ\sigma-finite.

?
Problem 2.1.4

Let Ω\Omega be uncountable. Let A={A⊆Ω:A is amc or Ac is amc}\mathcal{A}=\left\{ A \subseteq \Omega : A \text{ is amc or } A^{c} \text{ is amc}\right\}. Write μ(A)=0\mu (A)=0 if AA is amc and μ(A)=+∞\mu (A)=+\infty if AcA^{c} is amc. Then ( Ω,A,μ\Omega , \mathcal{A}, \mu ) is a measure space, and μ\mu is not σ\sigma-finite.

?
Problem 2.1.5

Let Ω\Omega be arbitrary, and let A={A⊆Ω:A is amc or Ac is amc}\mathcal{A}=\left\{ A \subseteq \Omega : A \text{ is amc or } A^{c} \text{ is amc}\right\}. Define μ\mu over A\mathcal{A} by stating that μ(A)=0\mu (A)=0 if AA is amc, and μ(A)=1\mu (A)=1 if AcA^{c} is amc.

?
(a)

μ\mu is not well-defined if Ω\Omega is amc, but μ\mu is well-defined if Ω\Omega is uncountable.

(b)

μ\mu is σ\sigma-finite measure on the σ\sigma-field AA when Ω\Omega is uncountable.

Problem 2.1.6

Suppose that A\mathcal{A} is a finite σ\sigma-field on Ω\Omega. Suppose that μ\mu is defined on A\mathcal{A} such that (M1), (M2), and (M4) hold. Then ( Ω,A,μ\Omega , \mathcal{A}, \mu ) is a measure space.

?
Problem 2.1.7

Let A={A⊆Ω:A is finite or Ac is finite}\mathcal{A}=\left\{ A \subseteq \Omega : A \text{ is finite or } A^{c} \text{ is finite}\right\}. Define μ\mu on A\mathcal{A} by

μ(A)={0 if A is finite 1 if Ac is finite . \mu (A)= \begin{cases} 0 & \text{ if } A \text{ is finite } \\ 1 & \text{ if } A^{c} \text{ is finite } .\end{cases}
?
(a)

μ\mu fails to be well-defined when Ω\Omega is finite.

(b)

If Ω\Omega is infinite, then μ\mu satisfies (M1), (M2), and (M4).

(c)

Let card⁡(Ω)=ℵ0\operatorname {card}(\Omega )=\aleph_{0}. Then μ\mu is finitely additive but not countably subadditive.

(d)

When Ω\Omega is uncountable, μ\mu is a measure. Is μσ\mu \sigma-finite?

Problem 2.1.8

Let card⁡(Ω)=ℵ0\operatorname {card}(\Omega )=\aleph_{0} and A=2Ω\mathcal{A}=2^{\Omega }. Let

μ(A)={0 if A is finite +∞ if A is infinite . \mu (A)= \begin{cases} 0 & \text{ if } A \text{ is finite } \\ +\infty & \text{ if } A \text{ is infinite } .\end{cases}

Then μ\mu is well-defined, μ\mu satisfies (M1), (M2), and (M4), and that (M3) fails. Also, μ\mu is σ\sigma-finite.

?
Problem 2.1.9

(M5) is not true if the hypothesis μ(A)<+∞\mu (A)<+\infty is omitted.

?
Problem 2.1.10

Let μ\mu denote a measure on a σ\sigma-field A\mathcal{A}, and let A,A1,A2,…∈AA, A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots \in \mathcal{A}.

?
(a)

μ(A)=∑k=1∞μ(A∩Ak)\mu (A)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty } \mu \left(A \cap A_{k}\right) when the AkA_{k} 's are disjoint with ⋃k=1∞Ak=Ω\bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty } A_{k}=\Omega.

(b)

μ(A1ΔA2)=0\mu \left(A_{1} \Delta A_{2}\right)=0 iff μ(A1)=μ(A2)=μ(A1∩A2)\mu \left(A_{1}\right)=\mu \left(A_{2}\right)=\mu \left(A_{1} \cap A_{2}\right).

(c)

μ(A2)=0\mu \left(A_{2}\right)=0 forces both μ(A1∪A2)=μ(A1)\mu \left(A_{1} \cup A_{2}\right)=\mu \left(A_{1}\right) and μ(A1ΔA2)=0\mu \left(A_{1} \Delta A_{2}\right)=0.

(d)

μ(A2)=0\mu \left(A_{2}\right)=0 forces μ(A1\A2)=μ(A1)\mu \left(A_{1} \backslash A_{2}\right)=\mu \left(A_{1}\right).

Problem 2.1.11

Let (Ω,A,μ)(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, \mu ) be a measure space such that there is B∈AB \in \mathcal{A} with 0<μ(B)<+∞0<\mu (B)<+\infty. Fix such a BB, and define μB:A→R‾\mu_{B}: \mathcal{A} \rightarrow \overline{\mathbb {R}} by the formula μB(A)=μ(A∩B)/μ(B)\mu_{B}(A)=\mu (A \cap B) / \mu (B).

?
(a)

(Ω,A,μB)\left(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, \mu_{B}\right) is a measure space.

(b)

Suppose in addition that Ω\Omega is the disjoint union of an amc collection of sets Bn∈AB_{n} \in \mathcal{A} such that each BnB_{n} has finite measure, and suppose that μ\mu is finite. Then for all A∈AA \in \mathcal{A} we have μ(A)=∑nμBn(A)⋅μ(Bn)\mu (A)=\sum_{n} \mu_{B_{n}}(A) \cdot \mu \left(B_{n}\right). Also, for each i∈Ni \in \mathbb {N} we have

μBi(A)=μA(Bi)⋅μ(A)∑nμA(Bn)⋅μ(A) \mu _{B_{i}}(A)=\frac{\mu _{A}\left(B_{i}\right) \cdot \mu (A)}{\sum _{n} \mu _{A}\left(B_{n}\right) \cdot \mu (A)}

This formula is known as Bayes' Rule.

Problem 2.1.12

Let S={s1,…,sm}S=\left\{ s_{1}, \ldots , s_{m}\right\}, and let {pu:u∈S}\left\{ p_{u}: u \in S\right\} denote a collection of nonnegative numbers with ∑u∈Spu=1\sum_{u \in S} p_{u}=1. Let Ω\Omega denote the set of sequences of SS. For each ω∈Ω\omega \in \Omega, write ω=(z1(ω),z2(ω),…)\omega =\left(z_{1}(\omega ), z_{2}(\omega ), \ldots \right). Given n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N} and H⊆SnH \subseteq S^{n}, let

Cn(H)={ω∈Ω:(z1(ω),…,zn(ω))∈H}. C_{n}(H)=\left\{ \omega \in \Omega :\left(z_{1}(\omega ), \ldots , z_{n}(\omega )\right) \in H\right\} .

Such a set is called a cylinder of rank nn. Let F={Cn(H):n∈N,H⊆Sn}\mathcal{F}=\left\{ C_{n}(H): n \in \mathbb {N}, H \subseteq S^{n}\right\}, so that F\mathcal{F} consists of all cylinders of all ranks. Define μ:F→R‾\mu : \mathcal{F} \rightarrow \overline{\mathbb {R}} as follows: if for some n∈Nn \in \mathbb {N} and H⊆SnH \subseteq S^{n} we have A={ω∈Ω:(z1(ω),…,zn(ω))∈H}A=\left\{ \omega \in \Omega :\left(z_{1}(\omega ), \ldots , z_{n}(\omega )\right) \in H\right\}, write μ(A)=∑{pi1⋯pin:(i1,…,in)∈H}\mu (A)=\sum \left\{ p_{i_{1}} \cdots p_{i_{n}}:\left(i_{1}, \ldots , i_{n}\right) \in H\right\}.

?
(a)

μ\mu is well-defined.

(b)

μ\mu satisfies (M1) and (M2), and is finitely additive.

(c)

Accept without proof, or recall, a special case of Tychonoff's Theorem: let A1,A2,…A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots denote a sequence of cylinders with A1⊇A2⊇⋯A_{1} \supseteq A_{2} \supseteq \cdots. If ⋂n=1∞An=∅\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty } A_{n}=\varnothing, then AN=∅A_{N}=\varnothing for some N∈NN \in \mathbb {N}. Any function ν\nu on F\mathcal{F} that satisfies (M1), (M2), and (M4) also satisfies (M3). Therefore, μ\mu is a measure, often referred to as product measure.