Section 11.1

Notation and Conventions

[5/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 11.1.1

Let Ω1\Omega_{1} denote a nonempty set, and let A\mathcal{A} denote a nonempty collection of subsets of Ω1\Omega_{1}. Let Ω2\Omega_{2} denote a nonempty set, and let B\mathfrak {B} denote a nonempty collection of subsets of Ω2\Omega_{2}.

?
(a)

Let B⊆Ω2B \subseteq \Omega_{2} be nonempty. Then σΩ1×B(A×{B})=σ(A)×{B}\sigma_{\Omega_{1} \times B}(\mathscr {A} \times \left\{ B\right\} )=\sigma (\mathscr {A}) \times \left\{ B\right\}.

(b)

σ(A×B)=σ(σ(A)×σ(B))\sigma (\mathscr {A} \times \mathscr {B})=\sigma (\sigma (\mathscr {A}) \times \sigma (\mathscr {B})).

Problem 11.1.2

Prove the claim in the Identification Lemma for the case where PP is a two-element set, which case is really the only one that we use.

?
Remark.
?

Identification Lemma: Let {Dp}p∈P\left\{ D_{p}\right\}_{p \in P} denote a disjoint family of nonempty subsets of II with ⋃p∈PDp=I\bigcup_{p \in P} D_{p}=I. Define Φ:Ω→×p∈PΩDp\Phi : \Omega \rightarrow \underset {p \in P}{\times } \Omega_{D_{p}} for every ω=(ωi)i∈I∈Ω\omega =(\omega_{i})_{i \in I} \in \Omega by the rule Φ(ω)=((ωi)i∈Dp)p∈P\Phi (\omega )=\left((\omega_{i})_{i \in D_{p}}\right)_{p \in P}. Then: (a) Φ\Phi is one-to-one and onto ×p∈PΩDp\underset {p \in P}{\times } \Omega_{D_{p}}. Let F∗\mathcal{F}^{*} denote the σ\sigma-field of subsets of ×p∈PΩDp\underset {p \in P}{\times } \Omega_{D_{p}} generated by sets of the form ×p∈PADp\underset {p \in P}{\times } A_{D_{p}}, where ADp∈FDpA_{D_{p}} \in \mathcal{F}_{D_{p}} for each p∈Pp \in P and ADp≠ΩDpA_{D_{p}} \neq \Omega_{D_{p}} for at most finitely many p∈Pp \in P. (b) For every set in F\mathcal{F} there is a unique corresponding set in F∗\mathcal{F}^{*}, and vice versa; i.e., Φ\Phi establishes a one-to-one correspondence between F\mathcal{F} and F∗\mathcal{F}^{*}.

Problem 11.1.3

Prove the Identification Lemma in full generality for the case where PP is an arbitrary set.

?
Remark.
?

Identification Lemma: Let {Dp}p∈P\left\{ D_{p}\right\}_{p \in P} denote a disjoint family of nonempty subsets of II with ⋃p∈PDp=I\bigcup_{p \in P} D_{p}=I. Define Φ:Ω→×p∈PΩDp\Phi : \Omega \rightarrow \underset {p \in P}{\times } \Omega_{D_{p}} for every ω=(ωi)i∈I∈Ω\omega =(\omega_{i})_{i \in I} \in \Omega by the rule Φ(ω)=((ωi)i∈Dp)p∈P\Phi (\omega )=\left((\omega_{i})_{i \in D_{p}}\right)_{p \in P}. Then: (a) Φ\Phi is one-to-one and onto ×p∈PΩDp\underset {p \in P}{\times } \Omega_{D_{p}}. Let F∗\mathcal{F}^{*} denote the σ\sigma-field of subsets of ×p∈PΩDp\underset {p \in P}{\times } \Omega_{D_{p}} generated by sets of the form ×p∈PADp\underset {p \in P}{\times } A_{D_{p}}, where ADp∈FDpA_{D_{p}} \in \mathcal{F}_{D_{p}} for each p∈Pp \in P and ADp≠ΩDpA_{D_{p}} \neq \Omega_{D_{p}} for at most finitely many p∈Pp \in P. (b) For every set in F\mathcal{F} there is a unique corresponding set in F∗\mathcal{F}^{*}, and vice versa; i.e., Φ\Phi establishes a one-to-one correspondence between F\mathcal{F} and F∗\mathcal{F}^{*}.

Problem 11.1.4

Show that EF\mathscr {E}_{F} is a semiring on ΩF\Omega_{F}.

?
Problem 11.1.5

Let A\mathcal{A} denote a semiring on Ω1\Omega_{1}, and let B\mathfrak {B} denote a semiring on Ω2\Omega_{2}. Then A×B\mathcal{A} \times \mathcal{B} is a semiring on Ω1×Ω2\Omega_{1} \times \Omega_{2}.

?