Chapter 4

The canonical model

[9/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 4.1

Let F:R→[0,1]F: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow [0,1] be a distribution function.

?
(a)

Show that there exists a probability space (Ω,A,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {A}, \mathbb {P}) and a random variable XX such that F(x)=P(X⩽x)F(x) = \mathbb {P}\left(X \leqslant x\right).

(b)

Show that there exists a probability space (Ω,A,P)(\Omega , \mathscr {A}, \mathbb {P}) and an iid sequence of random variables XnX_{n} such that F(x)=P(Xn⩽x)F(x) = \mathbb {P}\left(X_{n} \leqslant x\right).

(c)

State and prove the corresponding assertions for the dd - dimensional case.

Problem 4.2

Show that there exists a stochastic process (Xt)t⩾0\left(X_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} such that the random variables XtX_{t} are independent N(0,t)\mathrm{N}(0, t) random variables. This process also satisfies

P(lim⁡s→tXs exists)=0,∀t>0 \mathbb {P}\left(\lim _{s \to t} X_s \text{ exists}\right) = 0, \quad \forall t > 0
?
Problem 4.3

Let SS be any set and E\mathscr {E} be a family of subsets of SS. Show that

σ(E)=⋃{σ(C):C⊂E,C is countable } \sigma (\mathscr {E}) = \bigcup \left\{ \sigma (\mathscr {C}): \mathscr {C} \subset \mathscr {E}, \mathscr {C} \text{ is countable }\right\}
?
Problem 4.4

Let ∅≠E∈B(Rd)\emptyset \neq E \in \mathscr {B}\left(\mathbb {R}^{d}\right) contain at least two elements, and ∅≠I⊂[0,∞)\emptyset \neq I \subset [0, \infty ) be any index set. We denote by EIE^{I} the product space EI={f:f:I→E}E^{I} = \left\{ f: f: I \rightarrow E\right\} which we equip with its natural product topology (i.e. fn→ff_{n} \rightarrow f if, and only if, fn(t)→f(t)f_{n}(t) \rightarrow f(t) for every t∈I)t \in I). Then we can define the Borel σ\sigma - algebra B(EI)\mathscr {B}\left(E^{I}\right) and the product σ\sigma - algebra BI(E):=σ(πt:t∈I)\mathscr {B}^{I}(E): = \sigma \left(\pi_{t}: t \in I\right) where πt:EI→E,πt(f):=f(t)\pi_{t}: E^{I} \rightarrow E, \pi_{t}(f): = f(t) is the canonical projection onto the tt th coordinate.

?
(a)

Show that for every B∈BI(E)B \in \mathscr {B}^{I}(E) there exists a countable set J⊂IJ \subset I and a set A∈BJ(E)A \in \mathscr {B}^{J}(E) such that B=πJ−1(A).(πJB = \pi_{J}^{ - 1}(A) .\left(\pi_{J}\right. is the coordinate projection πJ:EI→EJ.)\left.\pi_{J}: E^{I} \rightarrow E^{J}.\right).

(b)

If II is not countable, then each ∅≠B∈BI(E)\emptyset \neq B \in \mathscr {B}^{I}(E) is not countable.

(c)

Show that BI(E)⊂B(EI)\mathscr {B}^{I}(E) \subset \mathscr {B}\left(E^{I}\right).

(d)

If II is not countable, then BI(E)≠B(EI)\mathscr {B}^{I}(E) \neq \mathscr {B}\left(E^{I}\right).

(e)

If II is countable, then BI(E)=B(EI)\mathscr {B}^{I}(E) = \mathscr {B}\left(E^{I}\right).

Problem 4.5

Let μ\mu be a probability measure on (Rd,B(Rd)),v∈Rd\left(\mathbb {R}^{d}, \mathscr {B}\left(\mathbb {R}^{d}\right)\right), v \in \mathbb {R}^{d} and consider the dd dimensional stochastic process Xt(ω):=ω+tv,t⩾0X_{t}(\omega ): = \omega +t v, t \geqslant 0, on the probability space (Rd,B(Rd),μ)\left(\mathbb {R}^{d}, \mathscr {B}\left(\mathbb {R}^{d}\right), \mu \right). Give an interpretation of XtX_{t} if μ=δx\mu = \delta_{x} for some x∈Rdx \in \mathbb {R}^{d} and determine the family of finite dimensional distributions of (Xt)t⩾0\left(X_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0}.

?
Problem 4.6

Let B=(Bt)t∈[0,1]B = \left(B_{t}\right)_{t \in [0,1]} be a BM1\mathrm{BM}^{1} and set W=(Wt)t∈[0,1]W = \left(W_{t}\right)_{t \in [0,1]} where Wt:=Bt−tB1W_{t}: = B_{t} - t B_{1}.

?
(a)

Show that WW is a mean zero Gaussian process and find its covariance function.

(b)

Let 0=t0<t1<⋯<tn<10 = t_{0} < t_{1} < \cdots < t_{n} < 1. Show that the law of (Wt1,…,Wtn)\left(W_{t_{1}}, \ldots , W_{t_{n}}\right) has a density p(x1,…,xn)p\left(x_{1}, \ldots , x_{n}\right) which is of the form

2πgt1(x1)⋅gt2−t1(x2−x1)⋅…⋅gtn−tn−1(xn−1−xn)⋅g1−tn(xn) \sqrt{2 \pi } g_{t_{1}}\left(x_{1}\right) \cdot g_{t_{2} - t_{1}}\left(x_{2} - x_{1}\right) \cdot \ldots \cdot g_{t_{n} - t_{n - 1}}\left(x_{n - 1} - x_{n}\right) \cdot g_{1 - t_{n}}\left(x_{n}\right)

where gt(x)=(2π)−1/2exp⁡(−x2/2t)g_{t}(x) = (2 \pi )^{ - 1 / 2} \exp \left( - x^{2} / 2 t\right) is the density of N(0,t)\mathrm{N}(0, t).

(c)

Show that the law of (Wt1,…,Wtn)\left(W_{t_{1}}, \ldots , W_{t_{n}}\right) coincides with the law of (Bt1,…,Btn)\left(B_{t_{1}}, \ldots , B_{t_{n}}\right) conditioned that B1=0B_{1} = 0. Compare this with Exercise 2.9(b).

(d)

Show that the processes WW and W′:=(W1−t)t∈[0,1]W^{\prime }: = \left(W_{1 - t}\right)_{t \in [0,1]} have the same probability law.

Problem 4.7

Let (C(o),B(C(o)),μ)\left(\mathcal{C}_{(\mathrm{o})}, \mathscr {B}\left(\mathcal{C}_{(\mathrm{o})}\right), \mu \right) be the canonical Wiener space (we assume d=1d = 1 ). We will now consider the space C\mathcal{C}, again equipped with the metric of locally uniform convergence and the Borel σ\sigma - algebra B(C)\mathscr {B}(\mathcal{C}). It is straightforward to check that

Lemma 4.1 remains valid in this context. We define Bt:C→RB_{t}: \mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} as coordinate projection Bt(w)=w(t)B_{t}(w) = w(t) where w∈Cw \in \mathcal{C} and the corresponding σ\sigma - algebras

Ft=F[0,t]=σ(Bs,s∈[0,t]) and F[t,∞)=σ(Bs,s⩾t),t∈[0,∞]. \mathscr {F}_{t} = \mathscr {F}_{[0, t]} = \sigma \left(B_{s}, s \in [0, t]\right) \quad \text{ and } \quad \mathscr {F}_{[t, \infty )} = \sigma \left(B_{s}, s \geqslant t\right), \quad t \in [0, \infty ] .

Let h>0h > 0. The (canonical) shift operator is the map θh:C→C,θhw(⋅)=w(⋅+h)\theta_{h}: \mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{C}, \theta_{h} w(\cdot ) = w(\cdot +h), i.e. (θhw)(t)=w(t+h)\left(\theta_{h} w\right)(t) = w(t+h).

?
(a)

Show that Bt∘θh=Bt+hB_{t} \circ \theta_{h} = B_{t+h}. Find θh−1F\theta_{h}^{ - 1} F for F={Bt∈C}F = \left\{ B_{t} \in C\right\}.

(b)

Show that θh:C(0)→C(0)\theta_{h}: \mathcal{C}_{(0)} \rightarrow \mathcal{C}_{(0)} is Ft+h/Ft\mathscr {F}_{t+h} / \mathscr {F}_{t} and F[t+h,∞)/F[t,∞)\mathscr {F}_{[t+h, \infty )} / \mathscr {F}_{[t, \infty )} measurable.

(c)

Denote by τC(w)=inf⁡{s⩾0:BS(w)∈C}\tau_{C}(w) = \inf \left\{ s \geqslant 0: B_{S}(w) \in C\right\} and set inf⁡∅:=∞\inf \emptyset : = \infty. Find an expression for θhτC:=τC∘θh\theta_{h} \tau_{C}: = \tau_{C} \circ \theta_{h} and show that τC∘θh=τC−h\tau_{C} \circ \theta_{h} = \tau_{C} - h if we happen to know that τC⩾h\tau_{C} \geqslant h.

Problem 4.8

We continue with the set - up introduced in Problem 7. Denote by (C(0),B(C(0)),μ)\left(\mathcal{C}_{(0)}, \mathscr {B}\left(\mathcal{C}_{(0)}\right), \mu \right) the canonical Wiener space and set Ω=C,A=B(C)\Omega = \mathcal{C}, \mathscr {A} = \mathscr {B}(\mathcal{C}), Bt(w)=w(t)B_{t}(w) = w(t) for w∈Ωw \in \Omega, and define for every probability measure π\pi on (R,B(R))(\mathbb {R}, \mathscr {B}(\mathbb {R})) a probability measure Pπ\mathbb {P}^{\pi } on (Ω,B(C)(\Omega , \mathscr {B}(\mathcal{C}) ) first on the "cylinder sets"

Pπ({w:w(t0)∈C0,w(t1)∈C1,…,w(tn)∈Cn}):=∫C0μ({w:w(t1)+x∈C1,…,w(tn)+x∈Cn})π(dx), \begin{aligned} & \mathbb {P}^{\pi }\left(\left\{ w: w\left(t_{0}\right) \in C_{0}, w\left(t_{1}\right) \in C_{1}, \ldots , w\left(t_{n}\right) \in C_{n}\right\} \right) \\ & \quad : = \int _{C_{0}} \mu \left(\left\{ w: w\left(t_{1}\right)+x \in C_{1}, \ldots , w\left(t_{n}\right)+x \in C_{n}\right\} \right) \pi (d x), \end{aligned}

where n∈N0,t0=0<t1<⋯<tnn \in \mathbb {N}_{0}, t_{0} = 0 < t_{1} < \cdots < t_{n} and C0,C1,…,Cn∈B(R)C_{0}, C_{1}, \ldots , C_{n} \in \mathscr {B}(\mathbb {R}). The measure P\mathbb {P} is then extended, by Kolmogorov's theorem (Theorem 4.8), onto B(C)\mathscr {B}(\mathcal{C}).

?
(a)

Show that the map w↦B(⋅,w)={t↦Bt(w)}w \mapsto B(\cdot , w) = \left\{ t \mapsto B_{t}(w)\right\} is measurable.

(b)

Show that BtB_{t} is, under Pπ\mathbb {P}^{\pi } and π=δx\pi = \delta_{x}, a Brownian motion started in B0=xB_{0} = x, i.e. a process satisfying (B1), (B2), (B4) and B0=xB_{0} = x instead of (B0) and Bt∼N(x,t)B_{t} \sim \mathrm{N}(x, t) instead of (B3).

(c)

Give an interpretation as to what Pπ\mathbb {P}^{\pi } means at the level of paths.

Problem 4.9

Let B=(Bt)t⩾0B = \left(B_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} be a canonical BM1\mathrm{BM}^{1} on Wiener space (Ω,A,P)=(C(0),B(C(0)),μ)(\Omega , \mathscr {A}, \mathbb {P}) = \left(\mathcal{C}_{(0)}, \mathscr {B}\left(\mathcal{C}_{(0)}\right), \mu \right) and Ft:=σ(Bs,s⩽t),F∞=σ(⋃t⩾0Ft)\mathscr {F}_{t}: = \sigma \left(B_{s}, s \leqslant t\right), \mathscr {F}_{\infty } = \sigma \left(\bigcup_{t \geqslant 0} \mathscr {F}_{t}\right), the filtration generated by BB. Show that for F∈F∞F \in \mathscr {F}_{\infty } the following assertions are equivalent:

?
(a)

F∈FtF \in \mathscr {F}_{t};

(b)

Let ω∈F\omega \in F and ω′∈Ω\omega^{\prime } \in \Omega. If we have for all s⩽ts \leqslant t that Bs(ω)=Bs(ω′)B_{s}(\omega ) = B_{s}\left(\omega^{\prime }\right), then ω′∈F\omega^{\prime } \in F.

Remark. This topic will be continued in Problem 5.23. This test actually holds for all processes with continuous sample paths (with the same argument as for Brownian motion) and, with some extra steps, we can relax this to processes whose paths are right continuous with finite left limits.