Chapter 3

Constructions of Brownian motion

[10/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 3.1

Use the Lévy - Ciesielski representation B(t)=∑n=0∞GnSn(t),t∈[0,1]B(t) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty } G_{n} S_{n}(t), t \in [0,1], to obtain a series representation for X:=∫01B(t)dtX: = \int_{0}^{1} B(t) d t and find the distribution of XX.

?
Problem 3.2

Let (Gn)n⩾0\left(G_{n}\right)_{n \geqslant 0} be a sequence of iid Gaussian N(0,1)\mathrm{N}(0,1) random variables, (ϕn)n⩾0\left(\phi_{n}\right)_{n \geqslant 0} be a complete ONS in L2([0,1],dt),B∈B[0,1]L^{2}([0,1], d t), B \in \mathscr {B}[0,1] be a measurable set and define WN(B):=∑n=0N−1Gn⟨  1B,ϕn⟩L2W_{N}(B): = \sum_{n = 0}^{N - 1} G_{n} \left\langle \; \mathbb {1}_{B}, \phi_{n} \right\rangle_{L^{2}}.

?
(a)

Show that the limit W(B):=lim⁡N→∞WN(B)W(B): = \lim_{N \rightarrow \infty } W_{N}(B) exists in L2(P)L^{2}(\mathbb {P}).

(b)

Find EW(A)W(B)\mathbb {E} W(A) W(B) for sets A,B∈B[0,1]A, B \in \mathscr {B}[0,1].

(c)

Show that B↦μ(B):=E[∣W(B)∣2]B \mapsto \mu (B): = \mathbb {E}\left[\left|W(B)\right|^{2}\right] is a measure. Is B↦W(B)B \mapsto W(B) a measure?

(d)

Let S\mathcal{S} denote all step functions of the form f(t):=∑j<∞cj  1Bj(t)f(t): = \sum_{j < \infty } c_{j} \; \mathbb {1}_{B_{j}}(t) where cj∈Rc_{j} \in \mathbb {R} and Bj∈B[0,1]B_{j} \in \mathscr {B}[0,1]. Show that the operator I(f):=∑jcjW(Bj)I(f): = \sum_{j} c_{j} W\left(B_{j}\right) is well - defined (i.e. independent of the particular representation of the step function).

(e)

Show that E[∣I(f)∣2]=∫∣f∣2dμ\mathbb {E}\left[\left|I(f)\right|^{2}\right] = \int \left|f\right|^{2} d \mu and use this isometry between L2([0,1],μ)L^{2}([0,1], \mu ) and L2(P)L^{2}(\mathbb {P}) to extend II to all f∈L2([0,1],μ)f \in L^{2}([0,1], \mu ).

Remark. If we take B=[0,t]B = [0, t], then Wt:=W([0,t]),t∈[0,1]W_{t}: = W([0, t]), t \in [0,1], is a Brownian motion. More on this topic can be found in [231, Chapters 9, 10].

Problem 3.3

Let ϕn=Hn,n=0,1,2,…\phi_{n} = H_{n}, n = 0,1,2, \ldots, be the Haar functions. The following steps show that the full sequence WN(t,ω):=∑n=0N−1Gn(ω)Sn(t),N=1,2,…W_{N}(t, \omega ): = \sum_{n = 0}^{N - 1} G_{n}(\omega ) S_{n}(t), N = 1,2, \ldots, converges uniformly for P\mathbb {P} - almost all ω∈Ω\omega \in \Omega.

?
(a)

Let (an)n⩾0⊂R\left(a_{n}\right)_{n \geqslant 0} \subset \mathbb {R} be a sequence satisfying an=O(nϵ)a_{n} = O\left(n^{\epsilon }\right) for some ϵ∈(0,1/2)\epsilon \in (0,1 / 2). Show that ∑n=0∞anSn(t)\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty } a_{n} S_{n}(t) converges absolutely and uniformly in t∈[0,1]t \in [0,1].

(b)

Let (Gn)n⩾0\left(G_{n}\right)_{n \geqslant 0} be a sequence of iid N(0,1)\mathrm{N}(0,1) random variables. Show that almost surely ∣Gn∣=O(log⁡n)\left|G_{n}\right| = O(\sqrt{\log n}).

Problem 3.4

Let (S,d)(S, d) be a complete metric space equipped with the σ\sigma - algebra B(S)\mathscr {B}(S) of its Borel sets. Assume that (Xn)n⩾1\left(X_{n}\right)_{n \geqslant 1} is a sequence of SS - valued random variables such that

lim⁡n→∞sup⁡m⩾nE[d(Xn,Xm)p]=0 \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \sup _{m \geqslant n} \mathbb {E}\left[d\left(X_{n}, X_{m}\right)^{p}\right] = 0

for some p∈[1,∞)p \in [1, \infty ). Show that there is a subsequence (nk)k⩾1\left(n_{k}\right)_{k \geqslant 1} and a random variable XX such that lim⁡k→∞Xnk=X\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty } X_{n_{k}} = X almost surely.

?
Remark.
?

If the hypothesis is strengthened to lim⁡n→∞E[sup⁡m⩾nd(Xn,Xm)p]=0\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty } \mathbb {E}\left[\sup_{m \geqslant n} d(X_{n}, X_{m})^{p}\right] = 0, the argument simplifies considerably: this says dn:=sup⁡m⩾nd(Xn,Xm)pd_{n}: = \sup_{m \geqslant n} d(X_{n}, X_{m})^{p} converges to 00 in Lp(P;R)L^{p}(\mathbb {P}; \mathbb {R}), so some subsequence (nk)k(n_{k})_{k} has lim⁡k→∞sup⁡m⩾nkd(Xnk,Xm)=0\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty } \sup_{m \geqslant n_{k}} d(X_{n_{k}}, X_{m}) = 0 almost surely, giving d(Xnk,Xnl)→0d(X_{n_{k}}, X_{n_{l}}) \rightarrow 0 as k,l→∞k, l \rightarrow \infty; completeness of SS then directly gives Xnk→XX_{n_{k}} \rightarrow X.

Problem 3.5

Let (Xt)t⩾0\left(X_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} and (Yt)t⩾0\left(Y_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} be two stochastic processes which are modifications of each other. Show that they have the same finite dimensional distributions.

?
Problem 3.6

Let (Xt)t∈I\left(X_{t}\right)_{t \in I} and (Yt)t∈I\left(Y_{t}\right)_{t \in I} be two processes with the same index set I⊂[0,∞)I \subset [0, \infty ) and state space. Show that

X,Y indistinguishable ⟹X,Y modifications ⟹X,Y equivalent.  X, Y \text{ indistinguishable } \Longrightarrow X, Y \text{ modifications } \Longrightarrow X, Y \text{ equivalent. }

Assume that the processes are defined on the same probability space and t↦Xtt \mapsto X_{t} and t↦Ytt \mapsto Y_{t} are right continuous (or that II is countable). Do the reverse implications hold, too?

?
Problem 3.7

Let (Bt)t⩾0\left(B_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} be a real - valued stochastic process with exclusively continuous sample paths. Assume that (Bq)q∈Q∩[0,∞)\left(B_{q}\right)_{q \in \mathbb {Q} \cap [0, \infty )} satisfies (B0) - (B3). Show that (Bt)t⩾0\left(B_{t}\right)_{t \geqslant 0} is a BM.

?
Problem 3.8

Let X′,X′′,ZX^{\prime }, X^{\prime \prime }, Z be random vectors such that X′  ⊥ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣⊥  X′′X^{\prime } \; \perp \! \! \! \perp \; X^{\prime \prime } and (X′,X′′)  ⊥ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣⊥  Z\left(X^{\prime }, X^{\prime \prime }\right) \; \perp \! \! \! \perp \; Z. Show that X′,X′′,ZX^{\prime }, X^{\prime \prime }, Z are independent.

?
Problem 3.9

Give a direct proof of the formula (3.5) using the joint probability distribution (W(t0),W(t),W(t1))\left(W\left(t_{0}\right), W(t), W\left(t_{1}\right)\right) of the Brownian motion W(t)W(t).

?
Problem 3.10

Show that there is a stochastic process (Wt)t∈R\left(W_{t}\right)_{t \in \mathbb {R}} satisfying (B0) - (B4).

?