Robert Brown’s new thing
[10/100%]Let , be random variables.
If, for all and if , then .
Let such that are Bernoulli random variables. We set and . Then but does not converge weakly to .
Assume that and . Is it true that ?
Let , be two sequences of random variables such that and . Then .
Let , be two sequences of random variables.
If and , then . Is this still true if ?
If and , then . Is this still true if ?
The direct approach to (a) is possible but relatively ugly. Part (b) has a relatively simple direct proof: fix ,
For the first term, using the uniform-continuity argument from Problem 1.2, for any there is with
using in the penultimate step.
Let , be random variables. If
then . If for some , then .
Let , be iid Bernoulli random variables with . We set
A one - dimensional random variable is Gaussian if it has the characteristic function with and . Prove that
where and is a Gaussian random variable.
where and is a Gaussian random variable. Do we have ?
Let . Determine the limit as of the random vector .
Consider the condition for all the random variables are identically distributed, centred and have variance 1.
Show that (B0), (B1), (B2), (B3) and (B0), (B1), (B2), (B3') are equivalent.
Let and be two independent real N - random variables. Show that
Let be a stochastic process on the measure space satisfying (B1)(B3). Assume further that there is some measurable set , such that for all we have and is continuous. Show that
is a Brownian motion on ;
is a Brownian motion on the space .
Notation. is the trace - algebra.
Method (b) also works if is not measurable, see Problem 1.9.
Let be a probability space and let be the outer measure. If is such that , then with and for every of the form , defines a new probability space.
Let be a probability space. The completion is the smallest extension such that contains all subsets of measurable null sets. Show that