Complex Measures
[13/0%]If is a complex measure on a -algebra , and if , define
the supremum being taken over all finite partitions of . Does it follow that ?
Prove that the example given at the end of Sec. 6.10 has the stated properties.
Prove that the vector space of all complex regular Borel measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space is a Banach space if .
Suppose , and is the exponent conjugate to . Suppose is a positive -finite measure and is a measurable function such that for every . Prove that then .
Suppose consists of two points and ; define , and . Is it true, for this , that is the dual space of ?
Suppose and prove that is the dual space of even if is not -finite. (As usual, .)
Suppose is a complex Borel measure on ) (or on the unit circle ), and define the Fourier coefficients of by
Assume that as and prove that then as . Hint: The assumption also holds with in place of if is any trigonometric polynomial, hence if is continuous, hence if is any bounded Borel function, hence if is replaced by .
In the terminology of Exercise 7, find all such that is periodic, with period .
This means that for all integers ; of course, is also assumed to be an integer.
Suppose that is a sequence of positive continuous functions on , that is a positive Borel measure on , and that
(i) a.e. ,
(ii) for all ,
(iii) for every .
Does it follow that ?
Let be a positive measure space. Call a set uniformly integrable if to each corresponds a such that
whenever and .
Prove that every finite subset of is uniformly integrable.
Prove the following convergence theorem of Vitali:
a.e., then and
Suggestion: Use Egoroff's theorem.
Show that (b) fails if is Lebesgue measure on , even if is assumed to be bounded. Hypothesis (i) can therefore not be omitted in (b).
Show that hypothesis (iv) is redundant in (b) for some (for instance, for Lebesgue measure on a bounded interval), but that there are finite measures for which the omission of (iv) would make (b) false.
Show that Vitali's theorem implies Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, for finite measure spaces. Construct an example in which Vitali's theorem applies although the hypotheses of Lebesgue's theorem do not hold.
Construct a sequence , say on , so that for every , but is not uniformly integrable (with respect to Lebesgue measure).
However, the following converse of Vitali's theorem is true:
If , and
exists for every , then is uniformly integrable.
Prove this by completing the following outline. Define . Then is a complete metric space (modulo sets of measure 0), and is continuous for each . If , there exist (Exercise 13, Chap. 5) so that
If holds with and in place of . Thus (*) holds with in place of and in place of . Now apply (a) to : There exists such that
Suppose is a positive measure on for a.e., and there exists and such that for all . Prove that
Hint: is uniformly integrable.
Let be the collection of all sets in the unit interval such that either or its complement is at most countable. Let be the counting measure on this -algebra . If for , show that is not -measurable, although the mapping
makes sense for every and defines a bounded linear functional on . Thus in this situation.
Let , where is Lebesgue measure on . Show that there is a bounded linear functional on that is 0 on , and that therefore there is no that satisfies for every . Thus .