Section 3.1

Sums, Products, and Compositions

[12/0%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 3.1

Let AA and BB be measurable sets. Is f:A∪B→Rf: A \cup B \rightarrow \mathbb {R} continuous if and only if its restrictions to AA and BB are continuous?

?
Problem 3.2

Show that if h:E→Rh: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable, then for any α\alpha, so is α⋅h:E→R\alpha \cdot h: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R}.

?
Problem 3.3

Provide an example of a function f:[a,b]→Rf:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb {R} that is not measurable, while both ∣f∣\left|f\right| and f2f^{2} are measurable.

?
Problem 3.4

Let {fn:E→R}\left\{ f_{n}: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\right\} be a sequence of measurable functions. Define E0E_{0} to be the set of points xx in EE at which {fn(x)}\left\{ f_{n}(x)\right\} converges to a real number. Is the set E0E_{0} measurable?

?
Problem 3.5

Let EE be measurable and f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be continuous except at a countable number of points. Show that ff is measurable.

?
Problem 3.6

If EE is measurable and the function f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} has the property that f−1(c)f^{-1}(c) is measurable for each number cc, is ff necessarily measurable?

?
Problem 3.7

If the function f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} has the property that {x∈E∣f(x)>c}\left\{ x \in E \mid f(x) > c\right\} is a measurable set for each rational number cc, is ff necessarily measurable?

?
Problem 3.8

Show that f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable if and only if the function f^:R→R\hat{f}: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable, where f^(x)=f(x)\hat{f}(x) = f(x) for x∈Ex \in E and f^(x)=0\hat{f}(x) = 0 for x∉Ex \notin E.

?
Problem 3.9

Show that f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable if and only if for each Borel set A,f−1(A)A, f^{-1}(A) is measurable.

?
Problem 3.10

A function f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is said to be Borel measurable provided that its domain EE is a Borel set and for each cc, the set {x∈E∣f(x)<c}\left\{ x \in E \mid f(x) < c\right\} is a Borel set. Verify that Proposition 1 and Theorem 5 remain valid if we replace "(Lebesgue) measurable set" by "'Borel set."

Proposition 1 (Chapter 3): If f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable, then for every interval II of real numbers, f−1(I)f^{-1}(I) is measurable. Theorem 5 (Chapter 3): If f:E→Rf: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} and g:E→Rg: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} are measurable functions, then for any α\alpha and β\beta, αf+βg:E→R\alpha f + \beta g: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable (linearity), and f⋅g:E→Rf \cdot g: E \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable (products). Verify the following:

?
(i)

every Borel measurable function is Lebesgue measurable;

(ii)

if ff is Borel measurable and BB is a Borel set, then f−1(B)f^{-1}(B) is a Borel set;

(iii)

if ff and gg are Borel measurable, so is f∘gf \circ g; and (iv) if ff is Borel measurable and gg is Lebesgue measurable, then f∘gf \circ g is Lebesgue measurable.

Problem 3.11

Assume that f:R→Rf: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is measurable and g:R→Rg: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is continuous. Is the composition f∘gf \circ g necessarily measurable?

?
Problem 3.12

Suppose that f:[a,b]→Rf:[a, b] \rightarrow R is strictly increasing, continuous function that has a Lipschitz inverse. Show that g∘f:[a,b]→Rg \circ f:[a, b] \rightarrow R is measurable whenever g:R→Rg: R \rightarrow R is measurable.

?