Chapter 9

Conditional Expectation and Conditional Probability, and Related Properties and Results

[19/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 9.1

If XX is an integrable r.v. and {An,n=1,2,…}\left\{ A_{n}, n = 1,2, \ldots \right\} are pairwise disjoint events, show that

∫∑i=1∞AiXdP=∑i=1∞∫AiXdP \int _{\sum _{i = 1}^{\infty } A_{i}} X d P = \sum _{i = 1}^{\infty } \int _{A_{i}} X d P
?
Problem 9.2

Let XX be an integrable r.v. and, for B∈AB \in \mathcal{A} with P(B)>0\mathbb {P}\left(B\right) > 0, consider the conditional probability on A,P(⋅∣B)\mathcal{A}, \mathbb {P}\left( \cdot \mid B \right). Then show that

∫ΩXdP(⋅∣B)=1P(B)∫BXdP \int _{\Omega } X d \mathbb {P}\left( \cdot \mid B \right) = \frac{1}{\mathbb {P}\left(B\right)} \int _{B} X d P
?
Problem 9.3

Consider the probability space (Ω,A,P)=([0,1],B[0,1],λ)(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, P) = \left([0,1], \mathcal{B}_{[0,1]}, \lambda \right), where λ\lambda is the Lebesgue measure, and let F\mathcal{F} be the σ\sigma-field generated by the class {[0,14],(14,23]\left\{ \left[0, \frac{1}{4}\right],\left(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{2}{3}\right]\right., (23,1]}\left.\left(\frac{2}{3}, 1\right]\right\}. Also, let XX be the r.v. defined by: X(ω)=ω2,ω∈ΩX(\omega ) = \omega^{2}, \omega \in \Omega. Then show that

E[X∣F]=α1I[0,14]+α2I(14,23]+α3I(23,1], \mathbb {E}\left[ X \mid \mathcal{F} \right] = \alpha _{1} I_{\left[0, \frac{1}{4}\right]}+\alpha _{2} I_{\left(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{2}{3}\right]}+\alpha _{3} I_{\left(\frac{2}{3}, 1\right]},

and compute α1,α2,α3\alpha_{1}, \alpha_{2}, \alpha_{3}.

?
Problem 9.4

Let XX and YY be B\mathcal{B}-measurable and integrable r.v.s. We further assume that ∫BXdP≥∫BYdP\int_{B} X d P \geq \int_{B} Y d P for every B∈B(⊆A)B \in \mathcal{B}(\subseteq \mathcal{A}). Then show that X≥YX \geq Y a.s.

?
Problem 9.5
?
(i)

Let X≥0X \geq 0 a.s. on a set AA with P(A)>0\mathbb {P}\left(A\right) > 0, and suppose that ∫AXdP=0\int_{A} X d P = 0. Then show that X=0X = 0 a.s. on AA.

(ii)

Let X≥0X \geq 0, integrable, and X=0X = 0 a.s. on a set A∈B(⊆A)A \in \mathcal{B}(\subseteq A), with P(A)>0\mathbb {P}\left(A\right) > 0. Then show that EB[X]=0\mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X\right] = 0 a.s. on AA.

(iii)
Problem 9.6

If E[∣X∣r]<∞\mathbb {E}\left[\left|X\right|^{r}\right] < \infty, then show that ∣EB[X]∣r≤EB[∣X∣r]\left|\mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X\right]\right|^{r} \leq \mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[\left|X\right|^{r}\right] a.s., r≥1r \geq 1.

?
Problem 9.7

If the r.v. XX is integrable, then EB[X]\mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X\right] is finite a.s.

?
Problem 9.8

Recall that a function g:Ig: I (open interval) ⊆R→R\subseteq \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is said to be convex if g(α1x1+α2x2)≤α1g(x1)+α2g(x2)g\left(\alpha_{1} x_{1}+\alpha_{2} x_{2}\right) \leq \alpha_{1} g\left(x_{1}\right)+\alpha_{2} g\left(x_{2}\right) for all α1,α2≥0\alpha_{1}, \alpha_{2} \geq 0 with α1+α2=1\alpha_{1}+\alpha_{2} = 1, and all x1,x2∈Ix_{1}, x_{2} \in I. Prove the following generalization: if gg is as above, then:

g(α1x1+⋯+αnxn)≤α1g(x1)+⋯+αng(xn) g\left(\alpha _{1} x_{1}+\cdots +\alpha _{n} x_{n}\right) \leq \alpha _{1} g\left(x_{1}\right)+\cdots +\alpha _{n} g\left(x_{n}\right)

for any n≥2n \geq 2, any α1,…,αn≥0\alpha_{1}, \ldots , \alpha_{n} \geq 0 with α1+⋯+αn=1\alpha_{1}+\cdots +\alpha_{n} = 1, and all x1,…,xn∈Ix_{1}, \ldots , x_{n} \in I.

?
Problem 9.9

Recall the following lemma (Lemma 2). Let (Ω,BY,PY)\left(\Omega , \mathcal{B}_{Y}, P_{Y}\right), (Ω′,BY′,PY′)\left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime }, P_{Y}^{\prime }\right) be as before (i.e., BY′={A′⊆Ω′;Y−1(A′)=A for some A∈A}\mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime } = \left\{ A^{\prime } \subseteq \Omega^{\prime } ; Y^{-1}\left(A^{\prime }\right) = A \text{ for some } A \in \mathcal{A}\right\}, BY=Y−1(BY′)\mathcal{B}_{Y} = Y^{-1}\left(\mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime }\right), and PY,PY′P_{Y}, P_{Y}^{\prime } are the probability measures induced on BY,BY′\mathcal{B}_{Y}, \mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime }, respectively, by PP), and let g:(Ω′,BY′)→(R,B)g : \left(\Omega^{\prime }, \mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime }\right) \rightarrow \left(\mathbb {R}, \mathcal{B}\right) be measurable, so that g(Y):(Ω,BY)→(R,B)g(Y) : (\Omega , \mathcal{B}_{Y}) \rightarrow (\mathbb {R}, \mathcal{B}) is measurable (a r.v.). Then

∫B′g(y) dPY′=∫Bg(Y) dPY,B′∈BY′,B=Y−1(B′), \int _{B^{\prime }} g(y) \, dP_{Y}^{\prime } = \int _{B} g(Y) \, dP_{Y}, \quad B^{\prime } \in \mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime }, \quad B = Y^{-1}\left(B^{\prime }\right),

in the sense that, if one of these integrals exists, then so does the other, and both are equal.

Fill in the details in proving Lemma 2.

?
Problem 9.10

Let XX and YY be discrete r.v.s and recall (from the application following Theorem 11) that BY′\mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime } is the σ\sigma-field of subsets of R\mathbb {R} defined by BY′={B′⊆R\mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime } = \left\{ B^{\prime } \subseteq \mathbb {R}\right.; Y−1(B′)=AY^{-1}\left(B^{\prime }\right) = A for some A∈A}\left.A \in \mathcal{A}\right\}. For x,y∈Rx, y \in \mathbb {R} with P(Y=y)>0\mathbb {P}\left(Y = y\right) > 0, consider the conditional probability

P(X=x∣Y=y)=P(X=x,Y=y)/P(Y=y) \mathbb {P}\left( X = x \mid Y = y \right) = \mathbb {P}\left(X = x, Y = y\right) / \mathbb {P}\left(Y = y\right)

and show that, for each fixed xx, the function P(X=x∣Y=⋅)\mathbb {P}\left( X = x \mid Y = \cdot \right) is BY′\mathcal{B}_{Y}^{\prime }-measurable.

?
Problem 9.11

The Dominated Convergence Theorem in its classical form states: If ∣Xn∣≤Y\left|X_{n}\right| \leq Y a.s., n≥1,E[Y]<∞n \geq 1, \mathbb {E}\left[Y\right] < \infty, and either Xn→n→∞ a.s. XX_{n} \xrightarrow [n \rightarrow \infty ]{\text{ a.s. }} X or Xn→n→∞PXX_{n} \xrightarrow [n \rightarrow \infty ]{P} X, then E[Xnn→∞]E[X]\mathbb {E}\left[X_{n_{n}}^{ \rightarrow \infty }\right] \mathbb {E}\left[X\right] finite.

In the framework of conditional expectations, we have shown that: If ∣Xn∣≤Y\left|X_{n}\right| \leq Y a.s., n≥1,E[Y]<∞n \geq 1, \mathbb {E}\left[Y\right] < \infty, and Xn→n→∞ a.s. XX_{n} \xrightarrow [n \rightarrow \infty ]{\text{ a.s. }} X with E[X]\mathbb {E}\left[X\right] finite, then EB[Xn]→n→∞ a.s. EB[X]\mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X_{n}\right] \xrightarrow [n \rightarrow \infty ]{\text{ a.s. }} \mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X\right] for any σ\sigma-field B⊆A\mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{A} (see Theorem 7 (iii')).

By means of an example, show that the convergence Xn→ a.s. XX_{n} \xrightarrow {\text{ a.s. }} X cannot be replaced by Xn→n→∞PXX_{n} \xrightarrow [n \rightarrow \infty ]{P} X and still conclude that EB[Xn]→→ a.s. EB[X]\mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X_{n}\right] \xrightarrow {\xrightarrow {\text{ a.s. }}} \mathbb {E}_{\mathcal{B}}\left[X\right].

?
Problem 9.12

Let the r.v.s XX and YY have the Bivariate Normal distribution with parameters μ1,μ2\mu_{1}, \mu_{2} in R,0<σ1,σ2<∞\mathbb {R}, 0 < \sigma_{1}, \sigma_{2} < \infty, and ρ∈[−1,1]\rho \in [-1,1], so that their joint probability density function (p.d.f.) is given by

pX,Y(x,y)=12πσ1σ21−ρ2e−q/2 p_{X, Y}(x, y) = \frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma _{1} \sigma _{2} \sqrt{1-\rho ^{2}}} e^{-q / 2}

where

q=11−ρ2[(x−μ1σ1)2−2ρ(x−μ1σ1)(y−μ2σ2)+(y−μ2σ2)2],x,y∈R \begin{aligned} q = \frac{1}{1-\rho ^{2}} \left[\left(\frac{x-\mu _{1}}{\sigma _{1}}\right)^{2}-2 \rho \left(\frac{x-\mu _{1}}{\sigma _{1}}\right)\left(\frac{y-\mu _{2}}{\sigma _{2}}\right)+\left(\frac{y-\mu _{2}}{\sigma _{2}}\right)^{2}\right], \quad x, y \in \mathbb {R} \end{aligned}
?
(i)

Show that the exponent may be written thus:

(1−ρ2)q=[(y−μ2σ2)−ρ(x−μ1σ1)]2+(1−ρ2)(x−μ1σ1)2=(y−bσ2)2+(1−ρ2)(x−μ1σ1)2, where b=μ2+ρσ2σ1(x−μ1). \begin{aligned} \left(1-\rho ^{2}\right) q = & {\left[\left(\frac{y-\mu _{2}}{\sigma _{2}}\right)-\rho \left(\frac{x-\mu _{1}}{\sigma _{1}}\right)\right]^{2}+\left(1-\rho ^{2}\right)\left(\frac{x-\mu _{1}}{\sigma _{1}}\right)^{2} } \\ = & \left(\frac{y-b}{\sigma _{2}}\right)^{2}+\left(1-\rho ^{2}\right)\left(\frac{x-\mu _{1}}{\sigma _{1}}\right)^{2}, \\ & \text{ where } b = \mu _{2}+\frac{\rho \sigma _{2}}{\sigma _{1}}\left(x-\mu _{1}\right) . \end{aligned}
(ii)

From part (i), it follows that:

pX,Y(x,y)=12πσ1exp⁡[−(x−μ1)22σ12]×12π(σ21−ρ2)exp⁡[−(y−b)22(σ21−ρ2)2]. \begin{aligned} p_{X, Y}(x, y) = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi } \sigma _{1}} \exp \left[-\frac{\left(x-\mu _{1}\right)^{2}}{2 \sigma _{1}^{2}}\right] \\ & \times \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi }\left(\sigma _{2} \sqrt{1-\rho ^{2}}\right)} \exp \left[-\frac{(y-b)^{2}}{2\left(\sigma _{2} \sqrt{1-\rho ^{2}}\right)^{2}}\right] . \end{aligned}

From this expression, and without any actual integration, conclude that the r.v. XX is distributed as N(μ1,σ12)N\left(\mu_{1}, \sigma_{1}^{2}\right); i.e., X∼N(μ1,σ12)X \sim N\left(\mu_{1}, \sigma_{1}^{2}\right), and by symmetry, Y∼N(μ2,σ22)Y \sim N\left(\mu_{2}, \sigma_{2}^{2}\right).

Problem 9.13

In reference to Exercise 12 (ii), and without any actual operations, conclude that the conditional distribution of the r.v. YY, given X=xX = x, is N(b,σ22(1−ρ2))N\left(b, \sigma_{2}^{2}\left(1-\rho^{2}\right)\right), where b=μ2+ρσ2σ1(x−μ1)b = \mu_{2}+\frac{\rho \sigma_{2}}{\sigma_{1}}\left(x-\mu_{1}\right); and by symmetry, the conditional distribution of XX, given Y=yY = y, is N(c,σ12(1−ρ2))N\left(c, \sigma_{1}^{2}\left(1-\rho^{2}\right)\right), where c=μ1+ρσ1σ2(y−μ2)c = \mu_{1}+\frac{\rho \sigma_{1}}{\sigma_{2}}\left(y-\mu_{2}\right).

?
Problem 9.14
?
(i)

In reference to Exercises 12 and 13 , and by writing E[XY]=E[E[XY]∣X]\mathbb {E}\left[X Y\right] = \mathbb {E}\left[ \mathbb {E}\left[X Y\right] \mid X \right], show that E[XY]=μ1μ2+ρσ1σ2\mathbb {E}\left[X Y\right] = \mu_{1} \mu_{2}+\rho \sigma_{1} \sigma_{2}.

(ii)

Use the definition of the covariance of two r.v.s XX and YY (with finite second moments), Cov⁡[X,Y]=E[(X−E[X])(Y−E[Y])]=E[XY]−(E[X])(E[Y])\operatorname {Cov}\left[ X, Y \right] = \mathbb {E}\left[(X-\mathbb {E}\left[X\right])(Y-\mathbb {E}\left[Y\right])\right] = \mathbb {E}\left[X Y\right]-(\mathbb {E}\left[X\right])(\mathbb {E}\left[Y\right]), in order to conclude that, in the present case, Cov⁡[X,Y]=ρσ1σ2\operatorname {Cov}\left[ X, Y \right] = \rho \sigma_{1} \sigma_{2}.

(iii)

From part (ii), conclude that, in the present case, the correlation coefficient of the r.v.s XX and Y,ρ(X,Y)Y, \rho (X, Y), is equal to ρ\rho.

Problem 9.15

If the r.v.s XX and YY have the Bivariate Normal distribution with parameters μ1,μ2\mu_{1}, \mu_{2} in R,0<σ1,σ2<∞\mathbb {R}, 0 < \sigma_{1}, \sigma_{2} < \infty and ρ∈[−1,1]\rho \in [-1,1], set

U=X−μ1σ1 and V=Y−μ2σ2 U = \frac{X-\mu _{1}}{\sigma _{1}} \text{ and } V = \frac{Y-\mu _{2}}{\sigma _{2}}

and show that the r.v.s UU and VV have the Bivariate Normal distribution with parameters 0,0,1,10,0,1,1 and ρ\rho, by transforming the joint p.d.f. of XX and YY into the joint p.d.f. of UU and VV.

?
Problem 9.16

Let XX and YY be r.v.s defined on the probability space (Ω,A,P)(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, P), and suppose that E[X2]<∞\mathbb {E}\left[X^{2}\right] < \infty. Then show that

?
(i)

The conditional variance of XX, given YY, is given by the formula

Var⁡[X∣Y]=E[{[X−E[X∣Y]]2∣Y}]=E[X2∣Y]−[E[X∣Y]]2 a.s.  \begin{aligned} \operatorname {Var}\left[ X \mid Y \right] & = \mathbb {E}\left[\left\{ [X-\mathbb {E}\left[ X \mid Y \right]]^{2} \mid Y\right\} \right] \\ & = \mathbb {E}\left[ X^{2} \mid Y \right]-[\mathbb {E}\left[ X \mid Y \right]]^{2} \text{ a.s. } \end{aligned}
(ii)

Var⁡[X]=E[Var⁡[X∣Y]]+Var⁡[E[X∣Y]]\operatorname {Var}\left[X\right] = \mathbb {E}\left[\operatorname {Var}\left[ X \mid Y \right]\right]+\operatorname {Var}\left[\mathbb {E}\left[ X \mid Y \right]\right].

Problem 9.17

(Wald)

?
(i)

Let X1,X2,…X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots be r.v.s and let NN be a r.v. taking the values 1,2,…1,2, \ldots, all defined on the probability space (Ω,A,P)(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, P). Define the function XX as

X(ω)=X1(ω)+⋯+XN(ω)(ω) X(\omega ) = X_{1}(\omega )+\cdots +X_{N(\omega )}(\omega )

and show that XX is a r.v.

(ii)

Now suppose that the XiX_{i} s are independent and identically distributed with E[X1]=μ∈R\mathbb {E}\left[X_{1}\right] = \mu \in \mathbb {R}, that NN is independent of the Xi sX_{i} \mathrm{~ s}, and that E[N]<∞\mathbb {E}\left[N\right] < \infty. Then show that E[X∣N]=μN\mathbb {E}\left[ X \mid N \right] = \mu N, and therefore E[X]=μ(E[N])\mathbb {E}\left[X\right] = \mu (\mathbb {E}\left[N\right]).

(iii)

If in addition to the assumptions made in part (ii), it also holds that Var⁡[X1]=σ2<∞\operatorname {Var}\left[X_{1}\right] = \sigma^{2} < \infty and Var⁡[N]<∞\operatorname {Var}\left[N\right] < \infty, then show that Var⁡[X∣N]=σ2N\operatorname {Var}\left[ X \mid N \right] = \sigma^{2} N.

(iv)

Use parts (ii) and (iii) here and part (ii) of Exercise 16 in order to conclude that Var⁡[X]=σ2(E[N])+μ2Var⁡[N]\operatorname {Var}\left[X\right] = \sigma^{2}(\mathbb {E}\left[N\right])+\mu^{2} \operatorname {Var}\left[N\right].

Problem 9.18

Let B\mathcal{B} be a sub- σ\sigma-field in (Ω,A,P)(\Omega , \mathcal{A}, P) which is equivalent to the trivial σ\sigma-field {∅,Ω}\left\{ \varnothing , \Omega \right\} (in the sense that, for every B∈BB \in \mathcal{B}, either P(B)=0\mathbb {P}\left(B\right) = 0 or P(B)=1\mathbb {P}\left(B\right) = 1), and let XX be a B\mathcal{B}-measurable (integrable) r.v. Then show that X=E[X]X = \mathbb {E}\left[X\right] a.s.

?
Problem 9.19

In reference to Example 2, show that, for each t=0,1,…t = 0,1, \ldots, there are, indeed, (n+t−1t)xi=(xi1,…,xin)\binom {n+t-1}{t} \mathbf{x}_{i} = \left(x_{i 1}, \ldots , x_{i n}\right) where each xi1,…,xinx_{i 1}, \ldots , x_{i n} ranges from 0 to tt, and xi1+⋯+xin=t,i=1,…,(n+t−1t)x_{i 1}+\cdots +x_{i n} = t, i = 1, \ldots ,\binom {n+t-1}{t}.

?