Conditional Expectation and Conditional Probability, and Related Properties and Results
[19/100%]If is an integrable r.v. and are pairwise disjoint events, show that
Let be an integrable r.v. and, for with , consider the conditional probability on . Then show that
Consider the probability space , where is the Lebesgue measure, and let be the -field generated by the class , . Also, let be the r.v. defined by: . Then show that
and compute .
Let and be -measurable and integrable r.v.s. We further assume that for every . Then show that a.s.
Let a.s. on a set with , and suppose that . Then show that a.s. on .
Let , integrable, and a.s. on a set , with . Then show that a.s. on .
If , then show that a.s., .
If the r.v. is integrable, then is finite a.s.
Recall that a function (open interval) is said to be convex if for all with , and all . Prove the following generalization: if is as above, then:
for any , any with , and all .
Recall the following lemma (Lemma 2). Let , be as before (i.e., , , and are the probability measures induced on , respectively, by ), and let be measurable, so that is measurable (a r.v.). Then
in the sense that, if one of these integrals exists, then so does the other, and both are equal.
Fill in the details in proving Lemma 2.
Let and be discrete r.v.s and recall (from the application following Theorem 11) that is the -field of subsets of defined by ; for some . For with , consider the conditional probability
and show that, for each fixed , the function is -measurable.
The Dominated Convergence Theorem in its classical form states: If a.s., , and either or , then finite.
In the framework of conditional expectations, we have shown that: If a.s., , and with finite, then for any -field (see Theorem 7 (iii')).
By means of an example, show that the convergence cannot be replaced by and still conclude that .
Let the r.v.s and have the Bivariate Normal distribution with parameters in , and , so that their joint probability density function (p.d.f.) is given by
where
Show that the exponent may be written thus:
From part (i), it follows that:
From this expression, and without any actual integration, conclude that the r.v. is distributed as ; i.e., , and by symmetry, .
In reference to Exercise 12 (ii), and without any actual operations, conclude that the conditional distribution of the r.v. , given , is , where ; and by symmetry, the conditional distribution of , given , is , where .
In reference to Exercises 12 and 13 , and by writing , show that .
Use the definition of the covariance of two r.v.s and (with finite second moments), , in order to conclude that, in the present case, .
From part (ii), conclude that, in the present case, the correlation coefficient of the r.v.s and , is equal to .
If the r.v.s and have the Bivariate Normal distribution with parameters in and , set
and show that the r.v.s and have the Bivariate Normal distribution with parameters and , by transforming the joint p.d.f. of and into the joint p.d.f. of and .
Let and be r.v.s defined on the probability space , and suppose that . Then show that
The conditional variance of , given , is given by the formula
.
(Wald)
Let be r.v.s and let be a r.v. taking the values , all defined on the probability space . Define the function as
and show that is a r.v.
Now suppose that the s are independent and identically distributed with , that is independent of the , and that . Then show that , and therefore .
If in addition to the assumptions made in part (ii), it also holds that and , then show that .
Use parts (ii) and (iii) here and part (ii) of Exercise 16 in order to conclude that .
Let be a sub- -field in which is equivalent to the trivial -field (in the sense that, for every , either or ), and let be a -measurable (integrable) r.v. Then show that a.s.
In reference to Example 2, show that, for each , there are, indeed, where each ranges from 0 to , and .