Rademacher Functions. The Khinchin Inequality
[31/90%]Prove that for any and any collection , where the numbers take the values +1 or -1, there exists a point such that for . What is the measure of the set of such points?
Prove that .
Let be the -th digit of the binary expansion of the number . Prove that almost everywhere on (0,1).
Find the sum of the series .
Prove that
;
.
Let be pairwise distinct natural numbers. Prove that
.
In particular, is an orthonormal system in .
Evaluate the integrals
;
;
.
Prove that if , then
Prove that for any complex numbers the following inequalities hold:
;
,
where are absolute constants.
Prove that for any complex numbers the following inequalities hold:
;
, where are absolute constants.
Prove that
is an orthonormal system in ;
for any complex numbers the following inequalities hold:
where are absolute constants.
Prove that for any complex numbers the following inequalities hold:
;
,
where are absolute constants.
Relying on the results of problems , prove that for any and any complex numbers the following inequalities hold:
;
, where are absolute constants.
Let . Prove that
;
almost everywhere on .
Each of the statements a), b) implies the equality almost everywhere on (0,1), which is known as the strong law of large numbers. Using the connection between Rademacher functions and the digits of the binary expansion (see problem 3.1 c)), deduce from this that the binary expansion of almost every number contains "equally many" zeros and ones (see problem 2.14).
Let be an arbitrary square matrix, the set of all vectors in whose coordinates equal .
Prove that
;
,
where are absolute constants.
Using the uniqueness theorem for the Fourier transform of finite Borel measures (see § 4), find the increasing distribution functions of the following functions:
;
,
where , and is an arbitrary (not necessarily increasing) sequence of pairwise distinct natural numbers.
Let be one of the intervals (see the definition of the Rademacher functions). Prove that for the following inequalities hold:
.
Prove that inequalities a), b) remain valid if is replaced by the set .
Let . Using the inequality , prove that for
;
if , then , .
Verify that for complex inequality a) is replaced by .
Let . Prove that
the series converges almost everywhere;
if , then for any number .
Prove that if the series converges in measure on some set of positive measure, then .
Prove that the following statements are equivalent:
-
;
-
the series converges in for some ;
-
the series converges in measure on the interval ;
-
the series converges almost everywhere on .
Prove that if the series converges in measure on some set of positive measure, then .
Let be a nonempty interval. Prove that if vrai sup , then (cf. problem 4.15).
Let be an orthonormal system in the space . Prove that
Sharpen this inequality for the Rademacher system.
The Haar system of functions is defined as follows. Every natural number can be uniquely represented in the form , where are nonnegative integers, . By definition we set for any , and for
Prove that
is an orthonormal system in ;
if , then for
if , then
if , then the series converges almost everywhere on (0,1);
the partial sum of the Fourier series of a function from with respect to the Haar system is the result of averaging over the intervals ;
deduce from e) that .
The Haar system of functions is defined as follows. Every natural number can be uniquely represented in the form , where are nonnegative integers, . By definition we set for any , and for
It is known that the Fourier series with respect to the Haar system of any summable function converges to it in . Relying on this, prove that
this series converges almost everywhere on ;
if , where is the -th partial sum of the Fourier series of the function with respect to the Haar system, then .
A reader familiar with the elements of functional analysis will notice that this is easily derived from the Banach-Steinhaus theorem.
Using the result of Problem 3.14, prove that for any and any the Khintchine inequality holds:
where are positive constants depending only on , and .
Note that the lower bound for is obvious (with coefficient , which cannot be increased), while the upper bound is obvious for (with coefficient , which cannot be decreased).
Prove that for , for , where (it is proved in [Haag] that are the best values of the coefficients and ). In particular, for all .
Prove that if for and some the inequality
holds for any real numbers , then it also holds for any complex .
For an analogous statement holds for the inequality
Let and . Prove that
;
the best constants in the Khintchine inequality satisfy the inequality ; moreover, .
Let and . Prove that
;
;
for the best constant in the Khintchine inequality equals .
Prove that statements a)--d) of Problem 3.17 are equivalent to the statement: e) the series converges in for every in .
Prove that for any trigonometric polynomial one can choose numbers such that
where is an absolute constant.
Consider the trigonometric polynomial , whose coefficients form a permutation of the numbers . Prove that the trivial estimate
cannot, in general, be improved in order: for every there exists a permutation of the numbers such that and independent of .
Prove that for any trigonometric polynomial one can choose numbers such that
Prove that for any there exist numbers such that the series
converges almost everywhere. Deduce from this that almost everywhere
Let be an arbitrary increasing sequence of natural numbers. Prove that
almost everywhere on . If , then we obtain from this a rather weak version of the law of the iterated logarithm: