Section 6.5

The Multiparameter Case

[6/0%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 6.5.1
?
(a)

If a vector Yn\mathbf{Y}_{n} in EsE_{s} converges in probability to a constant vector a\mathbf{a}, and if hh is a continuous function defined over EsE_{s}, show that h(Yn)→h(a)h\left(\mathbf{Y}_{n}\right) \rightarrow h(\mathbf{a}) in probability.

(b)

Use (a) to show that the elements of ∥Ajkn∥−1\left\| A_{j k n}\right\|^{-1} tend in probability to the elements of BB as claimed in the proof of Lemma 5.2.

Problem 6.5.2
?
(a)

Show that (5.26) with the remainder term neglected has the same form as (5.15) and identify the AjknA_{j k n}.

(b)

Show that the resulting ajka_{j k} of Lemma 5.2 are the same as those of (5.23).

(c)

Show that the remainder term in (5.26) can be neglected in the proof of Theorem 5.3.

Problem 6.5.3

Let X1,…,XnX_{1}, \ldots , X_{n} be iid according to N(ξ,σ2)N\left(\xi , \sigma^{2}\right).

?
(a)

Show that the likelihood equations have a unique root.

(b)

Show directly (i.e., without recourse to Theorem 5.1) that the MLEs ξ^\hat{\xi } and σ^\hat{\sigma } are asymptotically efficient.

Problem 6.5.4

Let (X0,…,Xs)\left(X_{0}, \ldots , X_{s}\right) have the multinomial distribution M(p0,…,ps;n)M\left(p_{0}, \ldots , p_{s} ; n\right).

?
(a)

Show that the likelihood equations have a unique root.

(b)

Show directly that the MLEs p^i\hat{p}_{i} are asymptotically efficient.

Problem 6.5.5

Theorem 5.3 states: suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 5.1 hold (the standard multiparameter likelihood-regularity and consistency conditions for an iid sample from a regular parametric family with parameter θ=(θ1,…,θs)\theta =(\theta_1,\ldots ,\theta_s)), and that θ~jn\tilde\theta_{jn} is a n\sqrt{n}-consistent estimator of θj\theta_j for j=1,…,sj=1,\ldots ,s. Let {δkn,k=1,…,s}\left\{ \delta_{kn}, k=1,\ldots ,s\right\} be the solution of the equations

∑k=1s(δkn−θ~kn)ljk′′(θ~n)=−lj′(θ~n),j=1,…,s, \sum _{k=1}^{s}\left(\delta _{k n}-\tilde{\theta }_{k n}\right) l_{j k}''\left(\tilde{\theta }_{n}\right)=-l_{j}'\left(\tilde{\theta }_{n}\right), \qquad j=1,\ldots ,s,

where l(θ)l(\theta ) is the log-likelihood, lj′=∂l/∂θjl_j' = \partial l/\partial \theta_j, and ljk′′=∂2l/∂θj∂θkl_{jk}'' = \partial^2 l /\partial \theta_j\partial \theta_k. Then, δn=(δ1n,…,δsn)\delta_n=(\delta_{1n},\ldots ,\delta_{sn}) is asymptotically efficient.

Corollary 5.4 states: suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 5.3 hold and that the elements Ijk(θ)I_{jk}(\theta ) of the information matrix of the XX's are continuous. Then, the solutions δkn′\delta_{kn}' of the equations

n(δkn′−θ~kn)Ijk(θ~n)=lj′(θ~n) n\left(\delta _{k n}'-\tilde{\theta }_{k n}\right) I_{j k}\left(\tilde{\theta }_{n}\right)=l_{j}'\left(\tilde{\theta }_{n}\right)

are asymptotically efficient.

Prove Corollary 5.4.

?
Problem 6.5.6

Show that there exists a function ff of two variables for which the equations ∂f(x,y)/∂x=\partial f(x, y) / \partial x= 0 and ∂f(x,y)/∂y=0\partial f(x, y) / \partial y=0 have a unique solution, and this solution is a local but not a global maximum of ff.

?