First Examples
[16/0%]Referring to Example 1.5, suppose that has the binomial distribution and the family of prior distributions for is the family of beta distributions .
Show that the marginal distribution of is the beta-binomial distribution with mass function
Show that the mean and variance of the beta-binomial is given by
[Hint: For part (b), the identities and are helpful.]
For the situation of Example 2.1, Lindley and Phillips (1976) give a detailed account of the effect of stopping rules, which we can illustrate as follows. Let be the number of successes in Bernoulli trials with success probability .
Suppose that the number of Bernoulli trials performed is a prespecifed number , so that we have the binomial sampling model, , . Calculate the Bayes risk of the Bayes estimator (1.1.12) and the UMVU estimator of .
Suppose that the number of Bernoulli trials performed is a random variable . The value was obtained when a prespecified number, , of successes was observed so that we have the negative binomial sample model, , . Calculate the Bayes risk of the Bayes estimator and the UMVU estimator of .
Calculate the mean squared errors of all three estimators under each model. If it is unknown which sampling mechanism generated the data, which estimator do you prefer overall?
Show that the estimator (2.2.4) tends in probability
to as ,
to as , and
to as .
Bickel and Mallows (1988) further investigate the relationship between unbiasedness and Bayes, specifying conditions under which these properties cannot hold simultaneously. In addition, they show that if a prior distribution is improper, then a posterior mean can be unbiased. Let , where , and let , .
Show that , so is unbiased.
Show that is a proper density.
Show that , and hence the posterior mean, is unbiased.
DasGupta (1994) presents an identity relating the Bayes risk to bias, which illustrates that a small bias can help achieve a small Bayes risk. Let and . The Bayes estimator under squared error loss is . Show that the Bayes risk of can be written
where is the bias of .
Verify the estimator (2.2.10).
In Example 2.6, verify that the posterior distribution of is .
In Example 2.6 with , show that the posterior distribution given the 's of is Student's -distribution with degrees of freedom.
In Example 2.6, show that the posterior distribution of is symmetric about when the joint prior of and is of the form , where is an arbitrary probability density on .
Rukhin (1978) investigates the situation when the Bayes estimator is the same for every loss function in a certain set of loss functions, calling such estimators universal Bayes estimators. For the case of Example 2.6, using the prior of the form of Problem 2.9, show that is the Bayes estimator under every even loss function.
Let and be independently distributed according to distributions and , respectively. Suppose that and are real-valued and independent according to some prior distributions and . If, with squared error loss, is the Bayes estimator of on the basis of , and is that of on the basis of ,
show that is the Bayes estimator of on the basis of ;
if and is the Bayes estimator of on the basis of , show that is the Bayes estimator of on the basis of .
For the density (2.2.13) and improper prior , show that the posterior distribution of continues to be improper.
In Example 2.7, obtain the Jeffreys prior distribution of .
Show that for the prior of part (a), the posterior distribution of is proper.
Verify the Bayes estimator (2.2.14).
Let and .
Show that is the limit of the Bayes estimators , where is . Hence, is both generalized Bayes and a limit of Bayes estimators.
For the prior measure , show that the generalized Bayes estimator is .
For , show that there is no sequence of proper priors for which .
This example is due to Farrell; see Kiefer 1966. Heath and Sudderth (1989), building on the work of Stone (1976), showed that inferences from this model are incoherent, and established when generalized Bayes estimators will lead to coherent (that is, noncontradictory) inferences. Their work is connected to the theory of "approximable by proper priors," developed by Stein (1965) and Stone (1965, 1970, 1976), which shows when generalized Bayes estimators can be looked upon as Bayes estimators.
For the situation of Example 2.8, verify that is a generalized Bayes estimator.
If and , show that is generalized Bayes under the improper prior .