Random and Mixed Effects Models
[17/0%]In Example 5.1:
Show that the joint density of the is given by (5.2).
Obtain the joint multivariate normal density of the directly by evaluating their covariance matrix and then inverting it.
Let be a nonsingular matrix with and for all . Determine the elements of .
Verify the UMVU estimator of given in Example 5.1.
Obtain the joint density of the in Example 5.1 in the unbalanced case in which , with the not all equal, and determine a minimal set of sufficient statistics (which depends on the number of distinct values of ).
In the balanced one-way layout of Example 5.1, determine as for , and .
In the preceding problem, calculate values of for finite . When would you expect negative estimates to be a problem?
The probability , which involves an random variable, can also be expressed using the incomplete beta function, whose values are readily available through either extensive tables or computer packages. Searle et al. (1992, Section 3.5d) look at this problem in some detail.
The following problem shows that in Examples 5.1-5.3 every unbiased estimator of the variance components (except ) takes on negative values. (For some related results, see Pukelsheim 1981.) Let have distribution and suppose that is a complete sufficient statistic for . If is any -estimable function defined over and its UMVU estimator takes on negative values with probability , then show that this is true of every unbiased estimator of .
Modify the car illustration of Example 5.1 so that it illustrates (5.5).
In Example 5.2, define a linear transformation of the leading to the joint distribution of the stated in connection with (5.6), and verify the complete sufficient statistics (5.7).
In Example 5.2, obtain the UMVU estimators of the variance components , and when , and compare them to those obtained without this assumption.
For the given in (5.8), determine a transformation taking them to variables with the distribution stated in Example 5.3.
In Example 5.3, obtain the UMVU estimators of the variance components , and .
In Example 5.3, obtain the UMVU estimators of and when so that the terms in (5.8) drop out, and compare them with those of Problem 5.12.
In Example 5.4:
Give a transformation taking the variables into the with density (5.11).
Obtain the UMVU estimators of , and .
A general class of models containing linear models of Types I and II, and mixed models as special cases assumes that the observation vector is normally distributed with mean as in (4.13) and with covariance matrix where the 's are the components of variance and the 's are known symmetric positive semidefinite matrices. Show that the following models are of this type and in each case specify the 's and 's:
(5.1 );
(5.5);
(5.5) without the terms ;
(5.8);
(5.10).
Consider a nested three-way layout with
in the versions
;
;
;
;
where the 's, 's, and 's are unknown constants defined uniquely by the usual conventions, and the 's, 's, 's, and 's are unobservable random variables, independently normally distributed with means zero and with variances and . In each case, transform the to independent variables and obtain the UMVU estimators of the unknown parameters.
For the situation of Example 5.5, relax the assumption of normality to only assume that and have zero means and finite second moments. Show that among all linear estimators (of the form known), the UMVU estimator of (the best linear predictor) is given by (5.14).
This is a Gauss-Markov theorem for prediction in mixed models. See Harville (1976) for generalizations.