Convergence in Probability and in Law
[27/0%]Lemma 9.3 states: a sufficient condition for to converge in probability to is that .
Prove Chebychev's Inequality: For any random variable and non-negative function ,
for every . (In many statistical applications, it is useful to take for some constants and .)
Prove Lemma 9.3. [Hint: Apply Chebychev's Inequality.]
To see that the converse of Theorem 8.2 does not hold, let be iid with , and let with probability and with probability . If and are constants satisfying
then is consistent for estimating , but does not tend to zero.
Suppose is an even function, nondecreasing and non-negative for and positive for . Then, for all implies that is consistent for estimating .
If , and tend in probability to , and , respectively, then tends in probability to .
If takes on the constant value with probability 1 and , then in probability.
Referring to Example 8.4, show that for any sequence of constants . In particular, the MLE is a consistent estimator of .
Verify Equation (8.9).
If is a sequence of real numbers tending to , and if , then .
If is consistent for , and is continuous, then is consistent for .
Let be iid as , and let if and . Find a consistent estimator of .
In Example 8.5, find for any .
Verify (8.10).
In Example 8.5, find the value of for which becomes independent of .
If has the value given in (a), then for any integers and , the joint distribution of is the same as that of .
Suppose have a common mean and variance , and that . For estimating , show that:
is not consistent if for all ;
is consistent if with .
Suppose that tends in law to a continuous limit distribution . Prove that:
If or , then also tends to a continuous limit distribution.
If or , then tends in probability to zero or infinity, respectively.
If , then in probability.
Show that if in probability, then it tends in law to a random variable which is equal to with probability 1.
In Example 8.7(i) and (ii), in probability. Show that:
If denotes the distribution function of in Example 8.7(i) and (ii), then for all and for all .
Determine for Example 8.7(i) and (ii).
If satisfies , find the limiting distribution of (suitably normalized)
and
.
If satisfies , find the limiting distribution of (suitably normalized)
,
,
, and
.
Variance stabilizing transformations are transformations for which the resulting statistic has an asymptotic variance that is independent of the parameters of interest. For each of the following cases, find the asymptotic distribution of the transformed statistic and show that it is variance stabilizing.
.
.
The function is a variance stabilizing transformation if the estimator has asymptotic variance , where is a constant independent of .
For any positive integer , find the variance stabilizing transformation if . In particular, be careful of the important case .
[A variance stabilizing transformation (if it exists) is the solution of a differential equation resulting from the Delta Method approximation of the variance of an estimator (Theorem 8.12) and is not a function of the distribution of the statistic (other than the fact that the distribution will determine the form of the variance). The transformations of part (b) are known as the Box-Cox family of power transformations and play an important role in applied statistics. For more details and interesting discussions, see Bickel and Doksum 1981, Box and Cox 1982, and Hinkley and Runger 1984.]
Serfling (1980, Section 3.1) remarks that the following variations of Theorem 8.12 can be established. Show that:
If is differentiable in a neighborhood of , and is continuous at , then may be replace by to obtain
Furthermore, if is a continuous function of , say , it can be replaced by to obtain
Theorem 8.16 states (it starts in a multivariate setting, but its conclusion is univariate): let , , be independent -tuples of random variables with and . Let , and suppose that is a real-valued function of arguments with continuous first partial derivatives. Then,
where , provided .
Prove Theorem 8.16.
A sequence of numbers is said to be as if and to be if there exist and such that for all or, equivalently, if is bounded.
If , then .
if and only if is bounded.
if and only if .
If is and tends to a finite limit, then is .
If and are both , so is .
If and are both , so is .
Suppose .
If and , then .
If and , then .
A sequence of random variables is bounded in probability if given any , there exist and such that for all . Show that if converges in law, then is bounded in probability.
In generalization of the notation and , let us say that if in probability and that if is bounded in probability. Show that the results of Problems 8.21-8.23 continue to hold if and are replaced by and .
Let have a bivariate normal distribution with means , variances , and with correlation coefficient tending to 1 as .
Show that where is and .
If , show that (8.25) does not hold.
Theorem 8.22 states: suppose that tends in law to the multivariate normal distribution with mean vector and covariance matrix , and suppose that are real-valued functions of , defined and continuously differentiable in a neighborhood of the parameter point and such that the matrix of partial derivatives is nonsingular in . Then, tends in law to the multivariate normal distribution with mean vector and covariance matrix .
Prove Theorem 8.22.