Ordinal Numbers
[69/81%]Prove that if linearly ordered sets are similar, then they are also equivalent.
Prove that any set equivalent to a linearly ordered set can be linearly ordered so that becomes similar to .
Let , , be linearly ordered sets. Prove that:
(reflexivity);
if , then (symmetry);
if and , then (transitivity).
Let and be linearly ordered sets. Prove that if , then , but the converse is false.
Prove that a set of elements can be linearly ordered in ways.
Prove that all finite linearly ordered sets of the same cardinality are similar to one another.
Prove that for infinite sets the assertion of the previous problem is false.
Prove that linearly ordered sets are similar if and only if there exists between them a one-to-one correspondence that is a monotone map.
Prove that for any linearly ordered set and any :
;
if is the least element of , then ;
is a linearly ordered set;
if , then .
Prove that the set of all segments of a linearly ordered set , ordered by the inclusion relation, is similar to .
Prove that an infinite linearly ordered set has order type if and only if it satisfies the following conditions:
has a least element ,
for every there exists a greatest lower bound of the set ( is called the immediate successor of );
for any subset of the set , from and containing, together with each of its elements, the immediate successor of that element, it follows that .
Prove that an infinite linearly ordered set has order type if and only if all its initial segments are finite.
Prove that any countable linearly ordered set has order type if and only if satisfies the following conditions:
has no least and no greatest element;
for any such that , there exists such that (such an order is called dense).
Prove that every countable linearly ordered set is similar to some subset of the set of rational numbers.
Let be a linearly ordered set containing at least two elements, Put, for any ,
Prove that:
is a linear order on ;
any countable linearly ordered set is similar to some subset of the set .
Prove that the order type of any interval (not segment) of real numbers is .
A subset of a linearly ordered set with order is called dense in if for any there exists such that or . Prove that if contains a countable subset dense in , then is similar to some subset of the set of real numbers with the natural order.
Show that for any order type .
Show that , , , .
Prove that:
for any order types and the order types and exist and are uniquely determined;
for any linearly ordered set and any family of order types , the order type exists and is uniquely determined.
Give an example of order types and such that
Prove that:
;
;
;
, but ;
;
;
;
;
is the order type of the segment for .
Give an example of order types and such that
Prove that:
;
;
;
;
;
.
Construct sets of order types
Prove that for any order types , , and
Give an example of order types , , and such that
Let and be linearly ordered sets, and a family of pairwise disjoint subsets of the set such that . Prove that if , then for any family of ordinal numbers we have .
Prove that , where for all and .
Prove that:
;
;
, where is a linearly ordered set, and is the set with the dual order.
Prove that:
every finite linearly ordered set is well-ordered;
the set , where , is well-ordered;
the set , where , is well-ordered;
the set , where , is not well-ordered.
Are the following sets well-ordered:
the set of integers with their natural order;
the set of rational numbers with the usual order ;
the set of real numbers with the usual order ;
the set of numbers of the form , where is a positive integer, with the usual order ?
Prove that:
every nonempty well-ordered set has a least element;
every subset of a well-ordered set is well-ordered.
Prove that if and is well-ordered, then can be well-ordered so that .
Show that if is a well-ordered set, then every element of the set , except the greatest one, has an immediate successor (see problem I.5.11).
Can an infinite decreasing chain of elements be extracted from a well-ordered set?
Prove that a linearly ordered set is well-ordered if and only if it contains no subset of type .
Let be a well-ordered set. Prove that there is no monotone one-to-one correspondence such that for some element .
Prove that a well-ordered set cannot be similar to its own segment or to a part of its own segment.
Prove that two distinct segments of a well-ordered set cannot be similar.
Prove that there exists at most one isomorphism between two well-ordered sets.
Prove that of two well-ordered sets, one is similar to the other or to a segment of it.
Prove that a linearly ordered set is finite if and only if it is well-ordered with respect to both the given order and the dual order.
Let be a well-ordered set, , and suppose that for every element the set satisfies the condition: if , then . Prove that (the principle of transfinite induction).
Let , be arbitrary ordinal numbers. Prove that:
or or ;
of the conditions listed above, only one holds for and .
Let , where and are ordinal numbers. Show that .
Prove that every set of ordinal numbers is well-ordered.
Prove that for any set of ordinal numbers :
there exists an ordinal number greater than all numbers in ;
among the ordinal numbers not belonging to the set there exists a least one.
Prove that there does not exist a set containing all ordinal numbers.
Prove that is the ordinal number immediately following (see problem I.5.11).
Prove that for any ordinal number exactly one of the following holds:
-
;
-
the set has a maximal element;
-
is a limit ordinal number.
Prove that every ordinal number can be represented in the form , where is a limit ordinal number or , and is a natural number.
Prove that:
the sum of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number;
the product of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number;
an ordered sum of ordinal numbers, where the index set is well-ordered, is an ordinal number.
Let and be linearly ordered. Prove that if and is an ordinal number, then and all the are well-ordered.
Prove that:
if and are well-ordered and , then ;
, ;
;
;
;
.
Give an example of ordinal numbers , , and such that
Prove that:
;
, if ;
;
, if ;
.
Let . An ordinal number is called the difference of and and is denoted by if .
Prove that:
exists and is unique;
;
;
.
Prove that:
if and , then ;
if , then there exist unique and such that , , and ;
if , then for any there exist unique and such that and (the division algorithm).
Prove that for any ordinal numbers and , if and , then there exist a natural number and ordinal numbers such that and , , (the Euclidean algorithm).
Let a property be such that for any ordinal number , if all ordinal numbers have the property , then has the property . Prove that all ordinal numbers have the property (the principle of transfinite induction for ordinal numbers).
Prove that for any ordinal numbers and , exists and is unique.
Construct a set of order type .
Prove that:
if and , then ;
;
.
Prove that:
if and , then ;
if and , then ;
if and , then there exist unique , and such that
if and , then there exist a natural number and sequences of ordinal numbers and such that
A set is called transitive if the relation
well-orders , , and , imply . Prove that for any ordinal number there exists a unique transitive set ordered by type .
The following assertion is called the axiom of choice.
-
Axiom of choice. Let be a nonempty set for every . Then there exists a choice function such that for every . Prove that each of the following assertions is equivalent to the axiom of choice.
-
Zorn’s lemma. A partially ordered set, each of whose linearly ordered subsets has an upper bound, contains a maximal element.
-
The Kuratowski–Hausdorff maximality principle. Every chain of a partially ordered set is contained in some maximal chain.
-
Zermelo’s axiom. For any family of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets there exists a set such that consists of exactly one point for every .
-
Zermelo’s theorem. Every set can be well-ordered.
-
The Teichmüller–Tukey lemma. Every family of sets having finite character has a maximal element. (A family of sets has finite character if it satisfies the condition: every finite subset of the set belongs to .)
Let be a partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound, and . Prove that there exists a maximal element such that .
Let be a set of subsets of a set such that for every chain (ordered by inclusion) the union of the sets from belongs to . Prove that then has a maximal element.
Prove that for every partial order on a set there exists a linear order on the set such that .