Section I.3

Categories and Functors

[30/47%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 43

Construct a contravariant functor from the category of all subsets of a given set (again the morphisms are the imbeddings) into itself.

?
Problem 44

Does there exist a universal repelling object in: the category of groups, the category of linear spaces over a given field, the categories dual to the categories of groups and linear spaces?

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB. The dual category has the same objects, with the arrows and the order of composition reversed.

Problem 45

Let G1G_1 be the category of abelian groups with a distinguished generator (the morphisms are the group homomorphisms preserving the distinguished generator.) Determine universal objects in G1G_1.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB. The dual category has the same objects, with the arrows and the order of composition reversed.

Problem 46

Let G2G_2 be the category of groups with two distinguished generators (the morphisms are the group homomorphisms preserving the distinguished generators). Prove that G2G_2 has a universal object. This object is called the free group with two generators.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 47

Let AG2AG_2 be the subcategory of G2G_2 (see Problem 46) whose objects are the abelian groups with two distinguished generators. Prove that there is a universal object in AG2AG_2. This object is called the free abelian group with two generators.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 48

Let An(K)A_n(K) be the category of associative algebras with nn distinguished generators over a field KK. Prove that there is a universal object in An(K)A_n(K). This universal object is the so-called tensor algebra over an nn-dimensional linear space over the field KK.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 49

Prove that there exists a universal object for the subcategory CAn(K)CA_n(K) of An(K)A_n(K) consisting of the commutative algebras.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 50

Prove that there exists a universal object for the category LAn(K)LA_n(K) of Lie algebras with nn distinguished generators over the field KK. The corresponding object is called the free Lie algebra with nn generators.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 51

Let G\mathfrak G be a Lie algebra over a field KK of characteristic zero. We consider the category K(G)K(\mathfrak G) whose objects are those linear mappings φ\varphi from G\mathfrak G into associative algebras (depending on the object) having the property that

φ([x,y])=φ(x)φ(y)−φ(y)φ(x). \varphi ([x,y])=\varphi (x)\varphi (y)-\varphi (y)\varphi (x).

A morphism of an object φ ⁣:G→A\varphi \colon \mathfrak G\to A to an object ψ ⁣:G→B\psi \colon \mathfrak G\to B is defined to be a homomorphism χ ⁣:A→B\chi \colon A\to B which makes the following diagram commute:

Prove that K(G)K(\mathfrak G) has a universal object φ0 ⁣:G→U(G)\varphi_0\colon \mathfrak G\to U(\mathfrak G). The algebra U(G)U(\mathfrak G) is called the associative hull or enveloping algebra of G\mathfrak G.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 52

Prove that the associative hull (see Problem 51) of the free Lie algebra with nn generators is isomorphic to the tensor algebra over an nn-dimensional space.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 53

Let {Xα}α∈A\left\{ X_\alpha \right\}_{\alpha \in A} be a family of objects in the category KK. We consider the category K~\widetilde K whose objects are the sets of morphisms φα∈Mor⁡(Xα,Y)\varphi_\alpha \in \operatorname {Mor}(X_\alpha ,Y), α∈A\alpha \in A (YY is some object in KK depending on the object in K~\widetilde K). The morphisms in K~\widetilde K are the sets of commutative diagrams of the form

If K~\widetilde K has a universal repelling object, then the corresponding object in KK is called the sum of the objects and is denoted by ∐α∈AXα\coprod_{\alpha \in A}X_\alpha. The morphisms iα ⁣:Xα→∐α∈AXαi_\alpha \colon X_\alpha \to \coprod_{\alpha \in A}X_\alpha are called the canonical imbeddings of the terms in the sum. Prove that in the category of sets and in the category of linear spaces over a given field, the sum of any family of objects is defined.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 54

The definition of the product of a family {Xα}α∈A\left\{ X_\alpha \right\}_{\alpha \in A} of objects in a category KK is obtained from the definition of the sum (see Problem 53) by reversing the arrows. Namely, the product ∏α∈AXα\prod_{\alpha \in A}X_\alpha is defined to be the sum of the objects XαX_\alpha in the dual category K~0\widetilde K^0. The morphisms pα ⁣:∏α∈AXα→Xαp_\alpha \colon \prod_{\alpha \in A}X_\alpha \to X_\alpha are called the canonical projections of the product onto the factors. Prove that in the categories of sets and of linear spaces over a given field, the product of any family of objects is defined.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB. The dual category has the same objects, with the arrows and the order of composition reversed.

Problem 55

Prove that the sum ∐k=1nLk\coprod_{k=1}^nL_k and the product ∏k=1nLk\prod_{k=1}^nL_k of finitely many objects of the category of linear spaces over a given field are isomorphic.

?
Problem 56

Let L1L_1 and L2L_2 be two linear spaces over a field KK. We consider the category whose objects are bilinear mappings φ ⁣:L1×L2→L\varphi \colon L_1\times L_2\to L, where LL is a linear space (depending on the object φ\varphi). A morphism from an object φ ⁣:L1×L2→L\varphi \colon L_1\times L_2\to L to an object ψ ⁣:L1×L2→M\psi \colon L_1\times L_2\to M is defined to be a linear mapping χ ⁣:L1→M\chi \colon L_1\to M for which the diagram

commutes. Prove that the resulting category has a universal repelling object π ⁣:L1×L2→L1⊗KL2\pi \colon L_1\times L_2\to L_1\otimes_K L_2. The space L1⊗KL2L_1\otimes_K L_2 is called the tensor product of the spaces L1L_1 and L2L_2 over the field KK.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 57

Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be finite abelian groups. We consider the category of all mappings φ ⁣:G1×G2→G\varphi \colon G_1\times G_2\to G, where GG is a finite abelian group (depending on the object), which are homomorphisms in each variable. The morphisms are the commutative diagrams of the form

where χ\chi is a homomorphism. Prove that this category has a universal object G1×G2→Tor⁡(G1,G2)G_1\times G_2\to \operatorname {Tor}(G_1,G_2) (the so-called torsion product of the two groups). Compute Tor⁡(Cm,Cn)\operatorname {Tor}(C_m,C_n), where CmC_m is the cyclic group of order mm.

?
Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 58

Let AA be a directed set, and let KK be a category. Suppose that for each α∈A\alpha \in A an object Xα∈Ob⁡KX_\alpha \in \operatorname {Ob}K has been singled out, and for each pair α<β\alpha <\beta a morphism φαβ∈Mor⁡(Xα,Xβ)\varphi_{\alpha \beta }\in \operatorname {Mor}(X_\alpha ,X_\beta ) has been chosen in such a way that for any α<β<γ\alpha <\beta <\gamma the diagram

commutes. Consider the category KAK_A whose objects are families {φα ⁣:Xα→X}α∈A\left\{ \varphi_\alpha \colon X_\alpha \to X\right\}_{\alpha \in A} of morphisms compatible with the φαβ\varphi_{\alpha \beta }, where XX is an object of KK depending on the family. A morphism from the object {φα ⁣:Xα→X}α∈A\left\{ \varphi_\alpha \colon X_\alpha \to X\right\}_{\alpha \in A} to the object {ψα ⁣:Xα→}α∈A\left\{ \psi_\alpha \colon X_\alpha \to {}\right\}_{\alpha \in A} is defined to be a morphism χ∈Mor⁡(X,Y)\chi \in \operatorname {Mor}(X,Y) such that the diagram

commutes for any α∈A\alpha \in A. A universal object in KAK_A (if it exists) is called the inductive limit of the family {Xα}\left\{ X_\alpha \right\}. The dual concept of a projective limit is defined to be a universal object in (KA)0(K_A)^0. Prove that:

?
(a)

the additive group of the field of rational numbers is the inductive limit of a countable family of groups of integers;

(b)

the ring Zp\mathbb {Z}_p of pp-adic integers (see Problem 33) is the projective limit of the rings of residue classes modulo pnp^n.

Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB. The dual category has the same objects, with the arrows and the order of composition reversed.

Problem 59

Each complex linear space can be regarded as a real space, and each complex linear mapping as a real linear mapping. Prove that the correspondence described is a covariant functor from the category L(C)L(\mathbb {C}) of linear spaces over C\mathbb {C} to the category L(R)L(\mathbb {R}) of linear spaces over R\mathbb {R}.

?
Problem 60

Prove that the mapping L↦L⊗RCL\mapsto L\otimes_{\mathbb {R}}\mathbb {C} (tensor product over R\mathbb {R} in the sense of Problem 56) generates a covariant functor from L(R)L(\mathbb {R}) to L(C)L(\mathbb {C}).

?
Problem 61

Prove that the categories L(R)L(\mathbb {R}) and L(C)L(\mathbb {C}) (see Problem 59) are not equivalent.

?
Remark.
?

Two categories K1K_1 and K2K_2 are equivalent if there exist covariant functors F ⁣:K1→K2F\colon K_1\to K_2 and G ⁣:K2→K1G\colon K_2\to K_1 such that F∘GF\circ G and G∘FG\circ F are naturally isomorphic to the identity functors in the respective categories.

Problem 62

Let GG be a group and KK a field. Consider the collection K[G]K[G] of formal linear combinations of elements of GG with coefficients in KK. It is an algebra over KK with respect to the natural operations of addition, multiplication, and multiplication by elements of KK. Prove that:

?
(a)

the correspondence G→K[G]G\to K[G] is a covariant functor from the category of groups into the category of KK-algebras;

(b)

K[G]K[G] is a universal object in the category of multiplicative mappings of the group GG into KK-algebras.

Remark.
?

An object AA of a category is called a universal repelling object (or, briefly, a universal object) if for every object BB there is exactly one morphism from AA to BB.

Problem 63
[NO TASK]
Problem 64
(a)
(b)
(c)
Problem 65
[NO TASK]
Problem 66
[NO TASK]
Problem 67
[NO TASK]
Problem 68
[NO TASK]
Problem 69
(a)
(b)
Problem 70
[NO TASK]
Problem 71
[NO TASK]
Problem 72
[NO TASK]