Boundedness and Invertibility
[11/100%]Give an example of an unbounded linear transformation that is bounded on a basis.
Is there such an example that annihilates a basis?
Is there such an example that is bounded on each basis?
Give examples of operators of arbitrarily large norms that are bounded by on a basis.
Could all the operators in such an example be normal?
Every weakly bounded set of bounded linear transformations is bounded.
A set of linear transformations (from into ) is weakly bounded if for each in and each in there exists a positive constant such that for all in . The set is strongly bounded if for each in there exists a positive constant such that for all in . Every bounded set is strongly bounded and every strongly bounded set is weakly bounded. To say that is bounded means that there exists a constant such that for all in .
If and are Hilbert spaces, and if is a bounded linear transformation that maps one-to-one onto , then is invertible.
A bounded linear transformation from a Hilbert space to a Hilbert space is invertible if there exists a bounded linear transformation (from into ) such that (the identity operator on ) and (the identity operator on ).
It is possible for a subspace to have a diminishable complement , in the sense that there exists another complement , with , .
Can a complement be infinitely diminishable, in the sense that there exists a complement with and infinite?
A complement of a subspace in a Hilbert space is a subspace such that and .
There exists a linear manifold dense in a Hilbert space such that .
Is every maximal orthonormal set in an inner-product space total?
A subset of a Hilbert (or, more generally, inner-product) space is total if its span is the entire space. A total orthonormal set is always maximal, i.e., not properly contained in any larger orthonormal set.
If there exists a one-to-one bounded linear transformation from a Hilbert space into a Hilbert space , then . If the image of is dense in , then equality holds.
If and are projections such that , then and have the same rank.
A linear transformation from a Hilbert space into a Hilbert space is closed if and only if it is bounded.
The graph of a linear transformation (not necessarily bounded) between inner product spaces and (not necessarily complete) is the set of all those ordered pairs (elements of ) for which . A linear transformation is called closed if its graph is a closed set.
If , does it follow that is left divisible by ?
An operator is "left divisible" by an operator if there exists an operator such that .
Is a symmetric linear transformation on an inner-product space necessarily bounded?
What if is a Hilbert space?
A linear transformation (not necessarily bounded) on an inner-product space (not necessarily complete) is called symmetric if for all and in . (This neutral term is used rather than "Hermitian" or "self-adjoint," because in the customary approach to Hermitian operators, , boundedness is an assumption necessary for the very formulation of the definition.)