Chapter 6

Boundedness and Invertibility

[11/100%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 50
?
(a)

Give an example of an unbounded linear transformation that is bounded on a basis.

(b)

Is there such an example that annihilates a basis?

(c)

Is there such an example that is bounded on each basis?

(d)

Give examples of operators of arbitrarily large norms that are bounded by 11 on a basis.

(e)

Could all the operators in such an example be normal?

Problem 51

Every weakly bounded set of bounded linear transformations is bounded.

?
Remark.
?

A set Q\mathbf{Q} of linear transformations (from H\mathbf{H} into K\mathbf{K}) is weakly bounded if for each ff in H\mathbf{H} and each gg in K\mathbf{K} there exists a positive constant α(f,g)\alpha (f,g) such that ∣⟨Af,g⟩∣≤α(f,g)\left| \left\langle Af, g \right\rangle \right| \leq \alpha (f,g) for all AA in Q\mathbf{Q}. The set Q\mathbf{Q} is strongly bounded if for each ff in H\mathbf{H} there exists a positive constant β(f)\beta (f) such that ∥Af∥≤β(f)\left\| Af\right\| \leq \beta (f) for all AA in Q\mathbf{Q}. Every bounded set is strongly bounded and every strongly bounded set is weakly bounded. To say that Q\mathbf{Q} is bounded means that there exists a constant γ\gamma such that ∥A∥≤γ\left\| A\right\| \leq \gamma for all AA in Q\mathbf{Q}.

Problem 52

If H\mathbf{H} and K\mathbf{K} are Hilbert spaces, and if AA is a bounded linear transformation that maps H\mathbf{H} one-to-one onto K\mathbf{K}, then AA is invertible.

?
Remark.
?

A bounded linear transformation AA from a Hilbert space H\mathbf{H} to a Hilbert space K\mathbf{K} is invertible if there exists a bounded linear transformation BB (from K\mathbf{K} into H\mathbf{H}) such that AB=1AB = 1 (the identity operator on K\mathbf{K}) and BA=1BA = 1 (the identity operator on H\mathbf{H}).

Problem 53
?
(a)

It is possible for a subspace M\mathbf{M} to have a diminishable complement N\mathbf{N}, in the sense that there exists another complement N0\mathbf{N}_0, with N0⊂N\mathbf{N}_0 \subset \mathbf{N}, N0≠N\mathbf{N}_0 \neq \mathbf{N}.

(b)

Can a complement N\mathbf{N} be infinitely diminishable, in the sense that there exists a complement N0\mathbf{N}_0 with N0⊂N\mathbf{N}_0 \subset \mathbf{N} and dim⁡(N∩N0⊥)\dim (\mathbf{N} \cap \mathbf{N}_0^{\perp }) infinite?

Remark.
?

A complement of a subspace M\mathbf{M} in a Hilbert space H\mathbf{H} is a subspace N\mathbf{N} such that M∩N=0\mathbf{M} \cap \mathbf{N} = 0 and M∨N=H\mathbf{M} \vee \mathbf{N} = \mathbf{H}.

Problem 54

There exists a linear manifold G\mathbf{G} dense in a Hilbert space H\mathbf{H} such that dim⁡G≠dim⁡H\dim \mathbf{G} \neq \dim \mathbf{H}.

?
Problem 55

Is every maximal orthonormal set in an inner-product space total?

?
Remark.
?

A subset of a Hilbert (or, more generally, inner-product) space is total if its span is the entire space. A total orthonormal set is always maximal, i.e., not properly contained in any larger orthonormal set.

Problem 56

If there exists a one-to-one bounded linear transformation from a Hilbert space H\mathbf{H} into a Hilbert space K\mathbf{K}, then dim⁡H≤dim⁡K\dim \mathbf{H} \leq \dim \mathbf{K}. If the image of H\mathbf{H} is dense in K\mathbf{K}, then equality holds.

?
Problem 57

If PP and QQ are projections such that ∥P−Q∥<1\left\| P-Q\right\| < 1, then PP and QQ have the same rank.

?
Problem 58

A linear transformation from a Hilbert space into a Hilbert space is closed if and only if it is bounded.

?
Remark.
?

The graph of a linear transformation AA (not necessarily bounded) between inner product spaces H\mathbf{H} and K\mathbf{K} (not necessarily complete) is the set of all those ordered pairs ⟨f,g⟩\left\langle f, g \right\rangle (elements of H⊕K\mathbf{H} \oplus \mathbf{K}) for which Af=gAf = g. A linear transformation is called closed if its graph is a closed set.

Problem 59

If ran⁡A⊂ran⁡B\operatorname {ran} A \subset \operatorname {ran} B, does it follow that AA is left divisible by BB?

?
Remark.
?

An operator AA is "left divisible" by an operator BB if there exists an operator XX such that A=BXA = BX.

Problem 60
?
(a)

Is a symmetric linear transformation on an inner-product space H\mathbf{H} necessarily bounded?

(b)

What if H\mathbf{H} is a Hilbert space?

Remark.
?

A linear transformation AA (not necessarily bounded) on an inner-product space H\mathbf{H} (not necessarily complete) is called symmetric if ⟨Af,g⟩=⟨f,Ag⟩\left\langle Af, g \right\rangle = \left\langle f, Ag \right\rangle for all ff and gg in H\mathbf{H}. (This neutral term is used rather than "Hermitian" or "self-adjoint," because in the customary approach to Hermitian operators, A=A∗A = A^{*}, boundedness is an assumption necessary for the very formulation of the definition.)