Unilateral Shift
[18/100%]If is a normal operator on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space , then is the direct sum of a countably infinite collection of subspaces that reduce , all with the same infinite dimension.
Discuss the assertion: every unitary operator is the product of a finite number of symmetries.
A symmetry is a unitary involution, i.e., an operator such that . It may be pertinent to recall that if an operator possesses any two of the properties "unitary," "involutory," and "Hermitian," then it possesses the third; the proof is completely elementary algebraic manipulation.
Is the unilateral shift the product of a finite number of normal operators?
What is the norm of the real part of the unilateral shift?
How far is the unilateral shift from the set of normal operators?
Does the unilateral shift have a square root? In other words, if is the unilateral shift, does there exist an operator such that ?
The commutant of the bilateral shift is the set of all multiplications.
The commutant of an operator (or of a set of operators) is the set of all operators that commute with it (or with each operator in the set). The bilateral shift can be viewed as multiplication by on of the unit circle. Here () whenever , and is formed with normalized Lebesgue measure.
The commutant of the unilateral shift is the set of all restrictions to of multiplications by multipliers in .
The commutant of an operator (or of a set of operators) is the set of all operators that commute with it (or with each operator in the set). The unilateral shift is the restriction of the bilateral shift to , where is the closed span in of the unit circle of the functions , (with ), and is the set of essentially bounded functions in . If the bilateral shift is regarded as a multiplication (by on ), then its commutant is the set of all multiplications on the same (Problem 146). If, however, the multiplier itself is in (and hence in ), then is invariant under the induced multiplication (cf. Problem 34), and the restriction of that multiplication to makes sense.
Every operator that commutes with the unilateral shift is the limit (strong operator topology) of a sequence of polynomials in the unilateral shift.
Every isometry is either unitary, or a direct sum of one or more copies of the unilateral shift, or a direct sum of a unitary operator and some copies of the unilateral shift.
A direct sum (finite or infinite) of isometries is an isometry. An isometry for which the unitary direct summand is absent is called pure.
How far is the unilateral shift from the set of unitary operators?
Which unilateral shifts have square roots?
Consider an isometry on a Hilbert space such that the subspaces , , are pairwise orthogonal and span , but make no demands on the value of the co-rank (the co-rank being ). Every such isometry may be called a shift (a unilateral shift). The co-rank of a shift (also called its multiplicity) constitutes a complete set of unitary invariants for it; the original unilateral shift is determined (to within unitary equivalence) as the shift of multiplicity (the simple unilateral shift). For the purpose of this problem every infinite cardinal number is even; recall that .
Every contraction whose powers tend strongly to is unitarily equivalent to a part of the adjoint of a unilateral shift.
A part of an operator is a restriction of it to an invariant subspace.
Every operator whose spectrum is included in the interior of the unit disc is similar to a contraction whose powers tend strongly to .
A quasinilpotent operator is one whose spectrum is the single point , equivalently one whose spectral radius is .
If , is similar to a contraction?
If is the (simple) unilateral shift and if is a non-zero subspace invariant under , then there exists a (necessarily unique) one-dimensional wandering subspace such that .
If is an operator on a Hilbert space , a subspace of is called wandering for if it is orthogonal to all its images under the positive powers of .
If is the orthogonal complement of (), then is invariant under , , and .
Let be the unilateral shift, with orthonormal basis , , for the underlying space so that . Each complex number of modulus less than is a simple eigenvalue of , with corresponding eigenvector .
A non-zero subspace of is invariant under if and only if there exists a function in , of constant modulus almost everywhere, such that is the range of the restriction to of the multiplication induced by .
Regard as the restriction to of the multiplication induced by on of the unit circle. A function in of constant modulus almost everywhere is called an inner function; informally, can be described as the set of all multiples of by functions in .
A function in vanishes either almost everywhere or almost nowhere.
If is a bilateral weighted shift with strictly positive weights , , then a necessary and sufficient condition that be reducible is that the sequence be periodic.