Problems
[12/50%]The sum of subsets or is the set .
If , and , then .
If , and , then .
The sum of subsets is the set . For any finite subsets
;
.
If , then .
For any finite arithmetic progression the inequality holds.
Problem 9.1.3(1) gives an example of a subset for which the upper bound in Problem 9.1.2(2) is attained. Problem 9.1.3(2) gives an example of a subset for which the lower bound in Problem 9.1.2(2) is ``almost attained''. An example of a subset for which this bound is attained is an arbitrary one-element subset.
Kneser's theorem for . For any finite subsets the inequality holds.
The following -analogue may be used below without proof.
Cauchy--Davenport theorem. For any prime and any two subsets the following inequality holds:
If and , then .
If is prime, and , then either or .
Analogously to the sum of sets, one can define their difference: .
Ruzsa's inequality. For any finite subsets
For any nonempty finite subset the inequality holds.
For any nonempty finite subsets the inequality holds.
For any finite subsets such that , the inequality holds.
For any nonempty subsets the following statements are equivalent:
-
;
-
;
-
;
-
;
-
for any ;
-
for any ;
-
.
The sum of arbitrary subsets is defined as
For an arbitrary subset and any integer , set .
Ruzsa's inequality (Problem 9.1.6) can be generalized to the case of a sum of sets.
Plünnecke--Ruzsa inequality. For any nonempty finite subsets
For any finite subset and arbitrary the inequalities hold.
Analogously to the sum of sets, one can define their product: .
If , and , then .
There exists such that for any finite set the inequality holds.
There exists such that for any arithmetic progression of length greater than 3 the inequality holds.
In fact, if is an arithmetic progression of length in the set of integers, then the bound from Problem 9.1.11(2) can be improved. Namely, for any there exists such that . The proof of this fact uses nontrivial theorems of number theory and therefore lies beyond the scope of this book.
Let be a set of points in the plane, and a set of lines in the plane. The number of incidences is the number of pairs of the form (point on the line, line), where the line and the point are taken from the corresponding sets.
An arbitrary finite nonempty subset is given. Denote by the family of lines in the plane given by the equation , where . Let . Prove that the total number of incidences between the lines of and the points of is at least .