Section 5.6

Sunflowers

[5/80%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 5.6.1

Find the size of a minimal SCR (Sec. 5.2) of a sunflower.

?
Remark.
?

A sunflower with kk petals and core YY is a collection of sets {F1,…,Fk}\left\{ F_{1},\ldots ,F_{k}\right\} such that ∣Fi∩Fj∣=Y\left|F_{i} \cap F_{j}\right| = Y for i≠ji \neq j and all the sets Fi∖YF_{i} \setminus Y are nonempty. For example,

  • pairwise disjoint sets form a sunflower with an empty core;

  • one-dimensional vector subspaces (Sec. 7.1) form a sunflower with a one-element core;

  • the sets XpX_{p} of all rational fractions with a fixed prime denominator pp form a sunflower with an infinite core.

Most of the problems in this section are taken from the book [J].

Problem 5.6.2
?
(1)

If ∣F∣>s!(k−1)s\left|\mathscr {F}\right| > s!(k-1)^{s}, then F\mathscr {F} contains a sunflower with kk petals.

(2)

There exist (k−1)s(k-1)^{s} subsets of a finite set, each of which has ss elements and among which one cannot choose a sunflower with kk petals.

Problem 5.6.3

For every prime pp there exists a weak Δ\Delta-system of (p+1)(p+1)-element sets that is not a sunflower and consists of p2+p+1p^{2}+p+1 sets.

?
Remark.
?

A weak Δ\Delta-system is a collection of sets S1,…,SkS_{1},\ldots ,S_{k} such that the numbers ∣Si∩Sj∣\left|S_{i} \cap S_{j}\right| are the same for all i≠ji \neq j. Obviously, a sunflower is a weak Δ\Delta-system. The converse is false. However, the following theorem holds.

Deza’s theorem. If F\mathscr {F} is a weak Δ\Delta-system of ss-element sets and ∣F∣⩾s2−s+2\left|\mathscr {F}\right| \geqslant s^{2}-s+2, then F\mathscr {F} is a sunflower.

The proof of the theorem is rather difficult.

Let us show that the above bound is sharp.

Problem 5.6.4
?
(1)

If F\mathscr {F} is a finite collection of ss-element sets and ∣F∣>(k−1)s\left|\mathscr {F}\right| > (k-1)^{s}, then there exist kk sets from F\mathscr {F} whose common part has fewer than ss elements.

(2)

The bound ∣F∣>(k−1)s\left|\mathscr {F}\right| > (k-1)^{s} in part (1) is sharp.

Remark.
?

The common part of sets S1,…,SkS_{1},\ldots ,S_{k} is the union ⋃i≠j(Si∩Sj)\bigcup_{i \neq j}(S_{i} \cap S_{j}) of all their pairwise intersections.

Problem 5.6.5
?
(1)

If F\mathscr {F} is a finite collection of ss-element sets and ∣F∣>(k−1)s\left|\mathscr {F}\right| > (k-1)^{s}, then F\mathscr {F} contains a flower with kk petals (and some core).

(2)

The bound ∣F∣>(k−1)s\left|\mathscr {F}\right| > (k-1)^{s} from part (1) is sharp.

Remark.
?

A flower with kk petals and core YY is a collection F\mathscr {F} of sets such that each of them contains YY and there is no SCR of k−1k-1 elements for the collection {S∖Y:S∈F}\left\{ S \setminus Y : S \in \mathscr {F}\right\}.