Diagonalization
[15/33%]Show that the set of functions from to is uncountable.
Show that there exists a co-r.e. set that is not r.e.
We say a partial recursive function is extendable if there exists a recursive function such that whenever . Show that there exists a partial recursive function that is not extendable.
Show that TOT is not r.e.
Show that there exists a simple set.
Let be any set (not necessarily countable). Show that there does not exist a one-to-one correspondence between set and the set of all subsets of .
Show that the set of all one-to-one, increasing functions from to N is uncountable.
What are wrong with the following diagonalization proofs?
We show that there exists a partial recursive function which is not enumerated in . Define . Then, by the existence of the universal DTM, we can see that is partial recursive. Thus, we have obtained a partial recursive function that is different from every at input , .
We show that the set is not r.e. Suppose, by way of contradiction, that REC is r.e. Then, there exists a recursive function whose range is equal to REC. Define . Since each is recursive, it is decidable whether . Therefore, is a recursive set. But this is a contradiction, since for every .
Assume that is a set with the following properties: (i) is recursive for all , and (ii) for all recursive functions for some . Show that is not an r.e. set.
Show that the class of primitive recursive functions is effectively enumerable (in the sense that there is an r.e. set such that (i) is primitive recursive, for all , and (ii) for all primitive recursive function for some ).
Show that there exists a recursive function that is not primitive recursive.
Show that set is not a recursive set.
Show that the set is not an r.e. set.
We say two sets and are recursively separable if there exists a recursive set such that and . Show that for any , sets and are not recursively separable, where .
Give a formal proof that set defined in Example 5.23 is r.e. That is, let be the string printed out in stage by the algorithm for ( if it does not output any string in stage ). Prove that is partial recursive (without using the Church-Turing Thesis).
Show that there exists a set such that both and are infinite but neither has an infinite r.e. subset.